The London Times: "Merrill Lynch predicted that gold would hit $600 an ounce in the long term after its recent rise above $500. Last month the precious metal hit a 25-year high of $579.50 an ounce amid concern among investors that America's huge trade gap would force a weakening of the dollar. The Chancellor sold 395 tonnes of Britain's gold reserves between 1999 and 2002, generating $3.5 billion. At yesterday's London closing price of $554.10 he would have generated more than $7 billion (£4 billion)."

You can make a lot of money by watching bankers, we long ago concluded.

You see where they are lending money - and you sell the borrowers short.

Or, you look at what they are selling - and you buy it. In the late '90s, so many banks wanted to sell gold that they had to collude to avoid glutting the market. Each central bank was only allowed to sell a certain amount each year. Britain led the way with its massive sale of nearly 400 tons, driving the price of gold down to a 20-year low. Debts and deficits were running wild. Wall Street was giddy over the biggest bubble in history. All over the world, central banks were goosing up their printing presses trying to keep up with the stacks of dollars arriving in their vaults. Was there ever a worse time to sell gold? We can't think of one.

But, bankers - especially central bankers - like politicians, can generally be counted on to do the wrong thing. At the end of the millennium, they did not let us down.

If Buffett, Williams, and The Daily Reckoning are right, this history has only begun. The dollar will lead the economy into a "hyperinflationary depression." If we are right, there will be dollars, dollars everywhere, but not a drop of real liquidity.

Eventually, the Bank of Ben Bernanke will do just what it has promised:

increasing the money supply as fast as it can, but people will still not be able to pay their bills. Prices for oil, gold, copper, and dinner may soar...while mortgages will go unpaid, houses will be foreclosed, and real incomes will fall. Gasoline prices rose 14 cents in a single week, says the Atlanta paper, but producer prices registered their biggest drop in almost three years, says Bloomberg.

Inflation and deflation side by side. The dollar will plummet on world markets, and yet, in the hands of American lumpenconsumers, it will be more precious than ever. How is it possible? What does it mean?

Ah, dear reader, that history...that coy tease...she will reveal all, but only when she wants, and only at great expense.

Over to Aussie Joel and The Rude Awakening for more news...

--------------

Justice Litle reporting from the pristine shores of Lake Tahoe:

"As super-major oil companies like Exxon struggle to replace their oil reserves at a reasonable cost, the demand for alternative energy and clean technology will only grow stronger."

For the rest of this story, and for more market insights, see today's issue of The Rude Awakening:

"Green is Green"

--------------

Bill Bonner, back in London with more views...

*** We went over to the Savoy for breakfast with a friend this morning. If you have never been to the Savoy, it is worth a visit. The place is elegantly furnished - almost opulent in an English kind of way. High tea at the Savoy is a treat. (We used to prefer high tea at Browns, but they've recently redecorated Browns so that it is more stylish and less attractive.) The last time we were there, we were entertained by a string quartet, while eating more delicate sandwiches and pastries than we could comfortably stomach. Breakfast, on the other hand, was very simple - just tea and croissants.

A French woman accompanied us; we were not in the mood for a full English breakfast.

"We were sorry to leave London," she told us. "Compared to Paris, London is really much more lively. Paris seems dreary after you've lived in London. I know it has become very expensive to live in London, but sometimes I think it is worth it.

"There are so many restaurants - so much to do. And it's so good for the children...especially our children. They are among a different crowd of people - much more diverse, and of course, English-speaking, too. So, they get the best of both cultures. We spoke French at home, and they spoke English and French at school. They had friends from many different backgrounds. Yes, we were sorry to go back to Paris...it was a very difficult adjustment for the children."

For a while, the sun came out. It looked as though spring might really be coming. But by the time we had finished our tea, the sky had clouded over again; an icy wind blew.

*** History continues grinding away at George W. Bush's administration.

There seems no end in sight to the bad news coming out of the Middle East.

The London papers say two out of three Americans now think the war against Iraq was a mistake. The other one is an idiot, they imply.

The British prime minister, meanwhile, is an "honorary neoconservative," says Francis Fukayama, who has deluded himself into thinking that democracy can be imposed at the speed of one's choosing - and at the point of a gun.

"Something similar happened to Bush," Fukayama continues. "When he stood for president, he talked about having a 'humble' foreign policy and attached nation building, and since then he has talked himself into believing in it.

"That's why this whole thing has been such a terrible disappointment. It has turned out exactly the opposite."

Wars of choice are almost always disappointing, we notice. Whether you call them "preemptive" wars, or merely opportunistic wars - they all seem to end up in misery and regret. As Bismarck put it, "it is like committing suicide for fear of death."

--- Advertisement ---

His Readers Had a Chance to Turn $5,000 Into $1 Million...and You Can Too!

This options Guru gave his readers a chance to turn $5,000 into $1 Million in just over 5 years... And it's no wonder, considering his 100% success rate in 2005 and 95% in 2004.

Learn how YOU can follow in their footsteps with his simple and straightforward system...

---------------------

The Daily Reckoning PRESENTS: This year could be the year where we see a silent tipping point in American politics. It will be a point of no return, where interest rates rise as America's borrowing costs no longer seem so easily manageable. Follow along as Dan Denning explores what might happen when a generation of young taxpayers is pitted against a generation of retiring pensioners...

SUBURBISTAN: HERE COMES THE FISCAL FIRESTORM By Dan Denning

"With the median home price rising by 26% in the past five years - while young adults' income has gone up less than 10% - people in their twenties are playing an endless game of catch-up. Buying a home isn't even in the cards since prices in many urban areas where young people go to start their careers have more than doubled." - Vanessa Robertson, MSNBC

"While there are exceptions in industries less subject to intense competition, G.M. is like many other once impregnable American corporate titans in arguing that reducing the burden of caring for retirees has become essential to compete against foreign companies with lower benefit costs and domestic rivals with younger work forces and less generous benefit packages. With retirees living longer and accounting rules forcing companies to more honestly reflect their full costs on their books, the corporate-sponsored social contract is no longer sustainable." - Eduardo Porter and Mary Williams Walsh, The New York Times.

Over five years ago, Addison Wiggin and I sat at our desks in Baltimore and had a right good laugh over the term Suburbistan. We knew the boomers would begin retiring soon. We knew the government wouldn't have the money to pay for it. We knew that when you pit a generation of young taxpayers against a generation of retiring pensioners, you'd get some conflict.

But Suburbistan?

Is it really possible that when cities, states, and the federal government can no longer pay their bills or keep their promises, you'll see more strident political fights between the generations? More conflict?

If you leave it up to politicians, you can almost guarantee it! Just ask Hillary Clinton. She spent a few days shilling for votes at the United Auto Workers Convention, where delegates sought a Marshall Plan for the U.S. Auto Industry.

Don't get me wrong. I think America has made a serious strategic error selling off its industrial assets, or allowing them to rust away, to say nothing at the loss of real manufacturing skill that's accompanied the loss of three million jobs to China and India. Part of this is the auto industry's inability to adapt to a world where labor is cheap and oil is expensive. The UAW is complicit in its own demise.

But what does this all mean?

Do you remember what it was that caused oil to bounce off $25 in 2003?

Following the commencement of hostilities in Iraq, the oil price fell. But then it started climbing. And it kept climbing. And it's still climbing.

What happened?

Somewhere along the way, markets realized that something important had changed in the world. It wasn't just speculative traders and geopolitical traders. It wasn't just the loss of Iraqi production and the growth of Chinese demand. It was, for lack of a better word, a silent tipping point.

Since then, we've begun to discuss and absorb the realities of the global energy market, namely the likelihood that global oil production has peaked, and that from here on out oil is going to be harder to find and costlier to get out of the ground.

This year could be the year where we see a silent tipping point in American politics. It will be a point of no return, where interest rates rise as America's borrowing costs no longer seem so easily manageable.

Political rhetoric will be more strident, as it was at Corretta Scott-King's funeral. After all, it's an election year.

But more than that, people will begin to feel in their guts that not everyone is going to get through this equally. Do the maths, as the British say. They don't add up. America can't pay for all its guns and all its butter.

To meet its borrowing needs, the American government has re-introduced the 30-year bond. There's a market for the longer-term bonds. And they help the government finance its projects. But the gap between what the American government spends and what it receives in revenue keeps growing.

According to a recent Reuters articles by Pedro Nicolaci da Costa (great name), "If the budget gap continues to grow as a percentage of the total economy, some worry the long-term attractiveness of the United States as an investment destination could be tainted as investors fret over the country's ability to manage its debts.

"Ballooning deficits could also create trouble for consumers down the line if foreign investors lose their affinity for U.S. assets, forcing a spike in interest rates."

You've heard this before, so it's not news. But this year is different.

And yes, this time is different. The U.S. Treasury market is the most liquid on the face of the planet. It's the natural destination for the world's surplus savings and capital.

But that is exactly what seems to be changing before our eyes. Foreign creditors are realizing that while the return on U.S. bonds is getting better all the time with rising rates, it might not be as safe as it looks. And with major global energy projects to invest in (see below), investing in hard assets and energy might be a much better destination for global savings.

If and when that happens, it will set off a domino effect in American political and economic life. It will unleash Suburbistan, as American government - at all levels - is unable to borrow in order to pay for the promises it's made to a population that now demands government "help."

What will happen? Will payroll taxes be increased? Will GM and Ford get bail-out packages from the next president?

Those are all stories we'll be following in the next two years. But I'm pleased to report that there is an investment solution to this problem.

One thing we can be certain of is that as political strife in America increases, so will volatility on the stock markets.

Dan Denning

The Daily Reckoning

Editor's Note: Dan Denning is the editor of Strategic Investment, one of the most respected "big-picture" investment newsletters on the market. A former specialist in small-cap stocks, Dan has been at the helm of Strategic Investment since 1999 - where, drawing from his network of global contacts, he has designed an investment strategy that takes into account global political and economic trends.

To learn more about Dan's highly regarded investment newsletter, see

here:

Strategic Investment