LIVE Gold Prices $  | E-Mail Subscriptions | Update GoldSeek | GoldSeek Radio 

Commentary : Gold Review : Markets : News Wire : Quotes : Silver : Stocks - Main Page 

 GoldSeek.com >> News >> Story  Disclaimer 
 
Latest Headlines

GoldSeek.com to Launch New Website
By: GoldSeek.com

Is Gold Price Action Warning Of Imminent Monetary Collapse Part 2?
By: Hubert Moolman

Gold and Silver Are Just Getting Started
By: Frank Holmes, US Funds

Silver Makes High Wave Candle at Target – Here’s What to Expect…
By: Clive Maund

Gold Blows Through Upside Resistance - The Chase Is On
By: Avi Gilburt

U.S. Mint To Reduce Gold & Silver Eagle Production Over The Next 12-18 Months
By: Steve St. Angelo, SRSrocco Report

Gold's sharp rise throws Financial Times into an erroneous sulk
By: Chris Powell, GATA

Precious Metals Update Video: Gold's unusual strength
By: Ira Epstein

Asian Metals Market Update: July-29-2020
By: Chintan Karnani, Insignia Consultants

Gold's rise is a 'mystery' because journalism always fails to pursue it
By: Chris Powell, GATA

 
Search

GoldSeek Web

 
Hubbard’s Bailout Cupboard is Bare



By: Brady Willett, FallStreet.com


-- Posted Tuesday, 11 November 2008 | Digg This ArticleDigg It! | Source: GoldSeek.com

Although he didn’t get the nomination to replace Greenspan, Columbia’s Glenn Hubbard often comments on what he believes is the best path for policymakers to take. Yesterday Mr. Hubbard was at it again, offering a brief commentary on the Nightly Business Report:

“Policymakers should take action to blunt expected future declines in house prices…Consensus forecasts predict additional house price declines of 15 percent over the next 18 months. If we could lower mortgage interest rates by one percentage point, we could blunt this decline. And we can accomplish this change without costly new subsidies.”

Hubbard has devised a new bailout plan to stop housing prices from falling that won’t cost that much - wonderful!.  Unfortunately this may not the case:

“…Financing mechanisms are available for the government to lower current borrowing costs for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac and lower mortgage rates and raise house prices.” [bolds added]

Financing mechanisms are available to lower borrowing costs for Fannie and Freddie?  Isn’t this akin to saying the government can lend money to itself more cheaply? Granted, it wouldn’t take an entirely ‘new’ bailout scheme to enact this type of plan, but isn’t added taxpayer exposure to the already bailed out Freddie and Fannie potentially very ‘costly’ Mr. Hubbard? 

As for Hubbard’s assumption that lower mortgage rates raise house prices (recent activity in the U.S. housing market would suggest otherwise), in October Hubbard said “The price of a home is partially dependent on the mortgage rate” and “Rising mortgage spreads and down-payment requirements are what's still driving down housing prices.” In other words, Hubbard believes that lowering mortgage rates/spreads and loosening down-payment requirements could help ‘blunt’ the decline in housing prices.  Also from October, Hubbard said that government endorsed mortgages “would be backed by houses and the verified ability to repay the debt by millions of Americans”, and that for borrowers with lower credit scores, the mortgage rate would be greater [than Hubbard’s prescribed rate].”  Apparently since these details infringed upon the optimistic noise Hubbard wanted to espouse on NBR they were not mentioned.

Suffice to say, Hubbard is reticent to acknowledge that falling mortgage rates are not a panacea.  He is also myopically ignoring common sense when he says that his “plan could offer a $100 billion annual stimulus.” Where in the world did Hubbard pull this $100 billion figure from anyway? The answer, again, may come from his comments made back in October:

“So if home prices increased 10% above where they would have been without government intervention, we estimate consumers will have an additional $100 billion annually to spend.”

Remember, Mr. Hubbard is a well respected professor that almost became Chairman of Federal Reserve, not a crackpot. If you ignore the costs of a housing bailout consumers could have an $100 billion to spend if housing prices increase by 10%?  Baffling, to say the least.

There are real costs when trying to stop housing prices from falling Mr. Hubbard, and these costs are already threatening to build: Yesterday Fannie Mae reported a $29 billion loss for 3Q08 and warned that the government’s $100 billion lifeline may not be enough, and Freddie Mac is expected to report terrible results later this week. In other words, while Hubbard’s plan to further utilize the Fannie and Freddie bailout conduit is plausible but not without costs, financial losses lead to the creeping possibility that more taxpayer funds will be required to simply keep these conduits solvent in the future.  Imagine Hubbard as a chef preparing his secret recipe, all the while unsure if his oven is about to blow-up.



November 10, 2008:
http://www.pbs.org/nbr/site/onair/transcripts/081110c/
October 2, 2008:
First, Let's Stabilize Home Prices Hubbard


BWillett@fallstreet.com
-- Posted Tuesday, 11 November 2008 | Digg This Article | Source: GoldSeek.com




 



Increase Text SizeDecrease Text SizeE-mail Link of Current PagePrinter Friendly PageReturn to GoldSeek.com

 news.goldseek.com >> Story

E-mail Page  | Print  | Disclaimer 


© 1995 - 2019



GoldSeek.com Supports Kiva.org

© GoldSeek.com, Gold Seek LLC

The content on this site is protected by U.S. and international copyright laws and is the property of GoldSeek.com and/or the providers of the content under license. By "content" we mean any information, mode of expression, or other materials and services found on GoldSeek.com. This includes editorials, news, our writings, graphics, and any and all other features found on the site. Please contact us for any further information.

Live GoldSeek Visitor Map | Disclaimer


Map

The views contained here may not represent the views of GoldSeek.com, Gold Seek LLC, its affiliates or advertisers. GoldSeek.com, Gold Seek LLC makes no representation, warranty or guarantee as to the accuracy or completeness of the information (including news, editorials, prices, statistics, analyses and the like) provided through its service. Any copying, reproduction and/or redistribution of any of the documents, data, content or materials contained on or within this website, without the express written consent of GoldSeek.com, Gold Seek LLC, is strictly prohibited. In no event shall GoldSeek.com, Gold Seek LLC or its affiliates be liable to any person for any decision made or action taken in reliance upon the information provided herein.