LIVE Gold Prices $  | E-Mail Subscriptions | Update GoldSeek | GoldSeek Radio 

Commentary : Gold Review : Markets : News Wire : Quotes : Silver : Stocks - Main Page 

 GoldSeek.com >> News >> Story  Disclaimer 
 
Latest Headlines

GoldSeek.com to Launch New Website
By: GoldSeek.com

Is Gold Price Action Warning Of Imminent Monetary Collapse Part 2?
By: Hubert Moolman

Gold and Silver Are Just Getting Started
By: Frank Holmes, US Funds

Silver Makes High Wave Candle at Target – Here’s What to Expect…
By: Clive Maund

Gold Blows Through Upside Resistance - The Chase Is On
By: Avi Gilburt

U.S. Mint To Reduce Gold & Silver Eagle Production Over The Next 12-18 Months
By: Steve St. Angelo, SRSrocco Report

Gold's sharp rise throws Financial Times into an erroneous sulk
By: Chris Powell, GATA

Precious Metals Update Video: Gold's unusual strength
By: Ira Epstein

Asian Metals Market Update: July-29-2020
By: Chintan Karnani, Insignia Consultants

Gold's rise is a 'mystery' because journalism always fails to pursue it
By: Chris Powell, GATA

 
Search

GoldSeek Web

 
Automation can’t Curb DC’s Spending



-- Posted Wednesday, 30 November 2011 | | Disqus

By: Dr. Jeffrey Lewis

 

As Washington DC frets the automatic cuts coming from a failure of the super-committee, the American public is watching their wealth vanish.  This disappearing act of wealth occurs on two fronts, first by the continuous spending and inflating in Washington, and secondly by a loss of confidence, which has sent the stock market plummeting in recent days.

 

It appears certain that the automatic cuts that were supposed to come into play after a failure in action by the super-committee might not be so automatic.  Senator John McCain is leading a Republican charge to save cuts from the military.  Democratic leaders are rallying their Congressional members to save cuts to social programs.

 

Nothing was lost

 

In truth, the headline figures made public as part of a $1.2 trillion deficit reduction were hardly true cuts.  Congress calculates future cuts to the CBO baseline, a model of future spending.  To cut only $1.2 trillion from 10 years of the CBO baseline is to tell the American people that Congress will spend more; it just won’t increase spending as much.  Military expenditures, for example, would still grow by $100 billion over ten years, even as Congress calls such changes “cuts” to the budget.

 

The real focus for investors shouldn’t be the suggested cuts to the budget.  With or without an additional $1.2 trillion in spending, the US deficit will continue to grow with virtually zero upper bound.  The real concern, for investors, taxpayers, and citizens of the United States, is that any action to thwart cuts to government spending could result in another round of downgrades on US debt issues.

 

S&P’s Early Move

 

Standard & Poors was belittled, even investigated, for downgrading the United States from triple-A to double-A status.  The ratings agency uses a forward model which judges the statistical potential for default, not the current financial standing of a business or nation itself.  In downgrading the United States, S&P told the markets that the United States has a higher potential for default, mostly due to political infighting in Washington DC.

 

Now that Washington has indicated it will not tolerate any amount of cuts to the budget, not even cuts to future spending growth, other ratings agencies could follow the S&P to downgrade American debt issues.  This weekend, a Moody’s economist noted that a downgrade from their firm is unlikely, saying ““You know, it’s all relative to expectations and investor expectations with regard to the committee I think are — have been and are still very, very low.” 

 

However, the agencies remain on the watch.   Ratings agencies warned that a failure today would not result in an immediate downgrade, as Congress has until the 2013 budget decision to enact spending cuts.  If Congress fails to act, then the next step, one year from today, would be new cuts to the United States’ standing in the credit markets.

 

Investors who are forward thinkers know that such a downgrade would rattle the markets.  For Wall Street, one downgrade was a source of entertainment; two downgrades would be confirmation of the new reality.  A second downgrade of American debt could send yields higher, government expenditures upward and deficits larger.  Investors should remind themselves that Greece and Italy were broke to begin with, but it was rocketing government debt yields that finally broke the camel’s back.

 

Dr. Jeffrey Lewis

 

www.silver-coin-investor.com


-- Posted Wednesday, 30 November 2011 | Digg This Article | Source: GoldSeek.com

comments powered by Disqus



 



Increase Text SizeDecrease Text SizeE-mail Link of Current PagePrinter Friendly PageReturn to GoldSeek.com

 news.goldseek.com >> Story

E-mail Page  | Print  | Disclaimer 


© 1995 - 2019



GoldSeek.com Supports Kiva.org

© GoldSeek.com, Gold Seek LLC

The content on this site is protected by U.S. and international copyright laws and is the property of GoldSeek.com and/or the providers of the content under license. By "content" we mean any information, mode of expression, or other materials and services found on GoldSeek.com. This includes editorials, news, our writings, graphics, and any and all other features found on the site. Please contact us for any further information.

Live GoldSeek Visitor Map | Disclaimer


Map

The views contained here may not represent the views of GoldSeek.com, Gold Seek LLC, its affiliates or advertisers. GoldSeek.com, Gold Seek LLC makes no representation, warranty or guarantee as to the accuracy or completeness of the information (including news, editorials, prices, statistics, analyses and the like) provided through its service. Any copying, reproduction and/or redistribution of any of the documents, data, content or materials contained on or within this website, without the express written consent of GoldSeek.com, Gold Seek LLC, is strictly prohibited. In no event shall GoldSeek.com, Gold Seek LLC or its affiliates be liable to any person for any decision made or action taken in reliance upon the information provided herein.