• The remainder of the charts can be found at the bottom.
  

• Repurchase agreements (RPs or Repos) are a huge factor for Federal Reserve Bank Credit. I'm still in research mode but it looks like there's huge borrowing going on to buy index futures/options and baskets of indexes' components (index fund trading I've been discussing which is a huge factor for gold/silver stocks and many other sectors) courtesy of the Fed's Open Market Operations ( http://app.ny.frb.org/markets/omo/dmm/temp.cfm ) which leads to occasional dramatic spikes in the stock market when there's a large increase in borrowing from the prior day/week or occasional dramatic plunges when there's a large decrease in borrowing from the prior day/week (Federal Reserve Bank Credit spikes or plunges http://www.federalreserve.gov/releases/h41/Current/ ). The US repo market reached USD 5 trillion (!) at the end of 2004 AND is growing at a two-digit pace, which means it's growing at over $500 Million/year!, so index fund trading is becoming even more of a factor.

  The US Federal Reserve and the European Repo Council (a body of the International Securities Market Association) both try to estimate the size of their respective repo markets. At the end of 2004, the US repo market reached USD 5 trillion and the European one passed EUR 5 trillion in outstandings. Both are growing at a two-digit pace. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Repurchase_agreement

• It's becoming obvious that the reason why NEM is such a good lead indicator for HUI/XAU (see link) is because it's a component of SPX (S & P 500), and, since SPX is the 800 lb gorilla of indexes, it drives index fund trading, hence SPX is the ultimate lead indicator for HUI/XAU and many other indexes. Luckily however SPX's cycles don't match gold/silver stocks' cycles. SPX is in a very long term downcycle/primary Bear Market since March 2000 while HUI, NEM, and the XAU are in a very long term upcycle/primary Bull Market since October (NEM/XAU)/November (HUI) 2000. However, SPX obviously has a profound affect on gold/silver stocks' minor intermediate term and short term cycles due to index fund trading. Rapid modest % moves in SPX cause rapid significant moves in NEM and other gold/silver stocks in the many indexes affected by SPX.
  

• Williams %R is for HUI (-69.20)/NEM (-68.50)/XAU (-75.70) on 2-17-06 (see latest charts). It typically hits an extremely overbought level (near 0) near monthly cycle highs, which is a reliable indication to look to sell, which doesn't mean you mechanically sell, but that you probably will sell very soon or you may start selling (in 2 or 3 stages). The converse is of course true for oversold levels at or below -80, but the most important consideration by far is cycle channels/trendlines. Indicators and timing tools are used for finetuning buy/sell decisions after cycle trendline buy/sell signals suggest it's time to buy/sell (see charts above, most of you should probably be holding until a long term cycle sell signal occurs in 6 to 12 months).

• An important bullish development is that gold's major intermediate term upcycle trendline since early February has turned up/increased in strength (see 1 year chart above).
  

• The USD's major intermediate term upcycle appears to have finally peaked, but 5% follow through is required for a major sell signal, and, will confirm that a major intermediate term cycle high occurred in mid November 2005 (see chart above). The USD appears to be in a Wave B upcycle.              
  

• The Coefficient of Determination is the square of the correlation coefficient (the true strength of the correlation is determined by squaring the correlation coefficient) and explains how much the USD is determining gold's and silver's price action/variability or the S & P 500 is determining gold's or silver's price action/variability. The US Dollar determines 17.64% (+42% times +42% = 17.64%) of gold's price action/variability now since the USD's correlation coefficient with gold is +42% for the past 180 trading days as of 2-17-06. The USD determines 24.01% of silver's price action/variability since the USD's correlation coefficient with silver is 49% for the past 180 trading days on 2-17-06. Notice that the correlation is now positive, so gold (and silver) will get a boost if the US Dollar rises, which is the opposite of the usual negative correlation where US Dollar strength leads to gold weakness and US Dollar weakness leads to gold strength. The correlation coefficient, r, provides the direction of the correlation (+ or  -) but only the square root of the strength of the correlation. The coefficient of determination, r², provides the true strength of the correlation but without indicating its direction. Both of them must be used to fully understand the entire picture regarding correlation's effect. For the time being the US Dollar is only a very minor factor for precious metals.

• Many of the bullets haven't changed from last week because this is a system ("Trade the Cycles") and because some are reading this for the first time. Some bullets are needed for reference purposes or to revisit important developments in the precious metals sector. "Trade the Cycles" is a relatively new system (began in 2003) that only reached a well developed state in 2005. Major buy/sell signal requirements were improved (really were developed for the first time) in 2005.
  

• The major lesson learned from the fact that the downcycle from 9-30's (all dates 2005) monthly cycle high to 10-5's cycle low was a short term/weekly one (Elliot Wave A of an A, B, C downcycle) not a monthly one is that a downcycle's trendline usually begins relatively flat. The downcycle from 9-30 to 10-5 DID begin relatively flat from a short term cycle perspective, with flatness on 9-30 that wasn't evident on the daily chart. On a daily chart a monthly downcycle trendline will almost always begin relatively flat, with one or two short term cycle highs not far below the monthly cycle highs. That was the best clue that 10-5's cycle lows probably weren't monthly ones. HUI, NEM, and the XAU's downcycle trendlines fell off a cliff from 9-30 until 10-5's cycle low on the daily charts, which meant that 10-5's cycle lows were probably short term rather than monthly cycle lows. Therefore, it's very important to keep in mind the nature of cycles and the fact that they tend to begin relatively flat. Also, the downcycle from 9-30 to 10-5 was a relatively brief and shallow downcycle by monthly downcycle standards, which was another indication that it probably wasn't the monthly cycle bottoming.

• Once a cycle's parabola/parabolic trendline sell signal occurs it's time to get out (if you're trading that cycle timeframe), which is what happened recently, when HUI, NEM, the XAU, and gold hitting 2% follow through monthly cycle parabolic trendline sell signals in a recent monthly upcycle. HUI, NEM, and the XAU rolled over dramatically following their 2% monthly cycle sell signals, with HUI gaining only +1.41% in the nine sessions from 9-19 until 9-30 2005. Even if modestly or even significantly higher highs occur and a monthly upcycle is still in place until proven otherwise, risk is far too high to remain long following a 2% monthly cycle parabolic trendline sell signal, because of the dramatic decline in the rate of ascent (monthly upcycle dramatically rolls over and enters the flat topping part of the cycle). The important thing to remember is that the 2% follow through parabolic trendline sell signals don't guarantee that the monthly cycle high has occurred (though it often has), but it does clearly indicate that risk is far too high to remain long because the cycle has entered the relatively flat topping area. 
  

• When an upcycle's parabolic trendline, or "parabola" as I like to call it, breaks down, substantial declines almost always occur (see first chart and the USD chart). Once a cycle dramatically rolls over (rate of ascent declines dramatically), it's usually time to take profits if you're trading that cycle timeframe. Risk skyrockets following parabolic trendline sell signals as discussed in previous updates. Sideways action is a sign that a cycle high or low has occurred or is imminent. The best time to buy or sell is usually during sideways action after a cycle's "parabola" has broken down (or is broken to the upside). Almost all cycles have parabolic shaped trendlines, but, during the final spike move (or plunge/inverse spike for downcycles) some judgement is required as to what the parabolic or nearly vertical trendline is, which is the final segment of the "parabola."
  

• You must chart the cycles for the stocks you trade/invest in, because they can be radically different than those of HUI, NEM, and the XAU. For example, CDE and SIL just hit long term cycle lows in May 2005 versus HUI, NEM, and the XAU doing so on May 10, 2004.
  

• It can take a while for a major upcycle's trendline to establish itself. HUI is more volatile and therefore tends to have more uncertainty than NEM and the XAU. This is one of the good reasons to look at three major upcycles (HUI, NEM, and the XAU) rather than one. Also, NEM, being a reliable lead indicator and the largest market cap component of HUI and the XAU, has the most important cycles. The long term upcycle's (since May 10, 2004) rising bottoms trendline didn't exist until May 16, 2005's major intermediate term cycle lows (HUI, NEM, and the XAU. See first chart above and the HUI chart dated August 5). It took slightly over a year to establish itself and ended up being very flat, probably because the long term cycle lows occurred well above the very long term upcycle trendline (see top chart above). The very important point I'm trying to make is to understand that markets do reliably experience cycles (look at the charts above) even though it can take a while for a cycle's trendline to clearly establish itself, which can lead to surprises with shorter cycles.

• The major intermediate term upcycle trendlines since May 16, 2005 for HUI, NEM, and the XAU (see charts above, gold since early February, see it's 1 year chart) should become more parabolic/sharply rising over time (clearly did recently), as cycles almost always do, and given that this should be the sharply rising phase of the long term upcycle (began on 5-10-04), dramatic gains should occur. HUI, NEM, and the XAU should approximately double from their major intermediate term cycle lows on 5-16-05 to their long term cycle highs as discussed in previous updates. This major intermediate term upcycle should last about twice as long as the previous one (6 months) from 5-10-04 until 11-17-04 and see about twice the gains (100% or more versus HUI's 51.50% from 5-10-04 until 11-17-04). Note in HUI's 5 year chart dated 6-29-05 (top chart above) that the long term cycles are getting longer. The previous long term upcycle's parabolic phase lasted about 9 months, so it's reasonable to assume that this one will last one year or more (now estimated to end July 2006).
  

• I update my gold/silver stock "Current Assessment" near the top of my home page (middle of the second bullet) typically weekly, so near critical times especially, you may want to check it out. Also, my "Trade the Cycles" Blog is updated usually two or three times a day.
  

• Gold put in a major bottom near $410 in early February 2005, so it led the stocks pricewise but didn't flash a major buy signal until June 2005 (see 1 year chart below), a few weeks after HUI, NEM, and the XAU did (see HUI chart dated 6-3-05). So, "major cycle effect wise" gold still lagged gold stocks even though pricewise it bottomed earlier, which is the first time I've seen gold lead gold stocks pricewise. Gold stocks still led gold in that they flashed a major intermediate term cycle buy signal a few weeks before gold did.
  

• If you're trading cycles you should sell whenever a parabolic trendline breaks down for whatever cycle timeframes you're trading (trade parabolas basically, see the first chart and other charts above, that have an ever increasing rate of ascent for upcycles or an ever increasing rate of descent for downcycles, use 2% follow through for minor buy/sell signals and 5% plus the NEM Lead Indicator for major buy/sell signals as previously discussed).
  

• Most of you should not be trading minor intermediate term cycles, but should be holding for the next approximately 6 to 9 months (the HUI 5 year charts dated 6-29-05 and 5-12-05 above shows that the long term cycles are getting longer), during which dramatic gains should occur for HUI, NEM, and the XAU because this is, according to the nature of cycles, the parabolic/sharply rising phase of the long term upcycle that began on May 10, 2004. HUI, NEM, and the XAU were very flat during the early phase of their long term upcycles, which isn't too surprising since cycles tend to begin relatively flat and become increasingly parabolic/sharply rising over time.
  

• The XAU 2 year chart dated 5-16-05 above shows the Elliot Wavesque 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 cycle structure of the major intermediate term upcycle from 5-10-04 until 11-17-04 as well as the A, B, C correction from 11-17-04 until 5-16-05. The fact that there are predictable cyclical patterns for gold/silver stocks and most if not all markets is well established. The major caveat being that one must know what the longer cycles are doing in order to time shorter cycle timeframes. The predictability of the long term cycles uptrend obviously comes from the very long term upcycle since late 2000 and knowing that very long term upcycles (and downcycles) tend to last about 17.2 years. Gold's very long term downcycle lasted 21 years, from 1980 until April 2001.
  

• Gold hit a major intermediate term cycle buy signal (see 1 year chart above) in June 2005 because it followed through by more than 5% after breaking it's intermediate term downcycle trendline in place since early December 2004. This major buy signal lagged gold stocks' major buy signal by a few weeks, but this is the first time that I've seen gold hit a major bottom (early February 2005) well before gold stocks did (May 16, 2005) in this very long term upcycle since late 2000 for gold/silver stocks and since April 2001 for gold (late 2001 for silver), which is probably a major positive. Gold usually lags gold stocks at major cycle highs/lows. Gold peaked in early December 2004 versus HUI, NEM, and the XAU doing so on 11-17-04 and gold peaked in early April 2004 versus HUI and NEM doing so on 12-2-03 and the XAU doing so on 1-6-04 (long term cycle highs).
  

• Most of you will do much better holding for the next 6 to 9 months as opposed to actively trading, at which time long term cycle highs should occur for HUI, NEM, and the XAU. HUI may rise to about 400-450 in the next 6-9 months. NEM may rise to the 70-75 area in the next 6-9 months. The XAU may rise to about 180-190 in the next 6-9 months.

• Major intermediate term cycle lows occurred for HUI, NEM, and the XAU on 5-16-05 at 165.71 for HUI, at 34.90 for NEM, and at 78.23 for the XAU, that were above their long term cycle lows that occurred at 163.81 for HUI, at 34.70 for NEM, and at 76.79 for the XAU on 5-10-04.
  

• Looking at the top chart above, the 5 year HUI chart showing the 6 long term cycle 5% follow through buy/sell signals in the gold/silver stock very long term upcycle, one sees that all 6 long term cycle buy/sell signals correctly indicated that the long term cycle high or low was in (the NEM Lead Indicator is also needed when a potential long term cycle low occurs well above the very long term upcycle trendline as discussed previously). The probability that coincidence/pure luck led to that outcome is only 1.56% which is 50% raised to the sixth power. So, assuming that a very long term upcycle remains in effect (they last about 17.2 years on average), there's a very high probability that long term cycle buy/sell signals will work in the future. I can provide countless examples for shorter cycle timeframes where the parabolic trendline buy/sell signals worked every time. The caveat is that one must know what the longer cycles are doing (where their trendlines are) or you might use the wrong trendline and get an erroneous buy/sell signal.
  

• The correlation coefficient is the square root of the strength of the correlation. The correlation coefficient is +42% on 2-17 (+43% on 2-10) for the past 180 trading days for gold, according to Moore Research Center, Inc. For silver the correlation coefficient with the USD is +49% on 2-17 (+48% on 2-10) for the past 180 trading days. Silver's correlation is usually much more positive than gold's because it's more of an industrial metal than gold is, hence it usually has a more positive correlation with US economic strength and a strong US Dollar. 

• The Coefficient of Determination is the square of the correlation coefficient (the true strength of the correlation is determined by squaring the correlation coefficient) and explains how much the USD is determining gold's and silver's price action/variability or the S & P 500 is determining gold's or silver's price action/variability. The US Dollar determines 17.64% (+42% times +42% = 17.64%) of gold's price action/variability now since the USD's correlation coefficient with gold is +42% for the past 180 trading days as of 2-17-06. The USD determines 24.01% of silver's price action/variability since the USD's correlation coefficient with silver is 49% for the past 180 trading days on 2-17-06. The correlation coefficient, r, provides the direction of the correlation (+ or  -) but only the square root of the strength of the correlation. The coefficient of determination, r², provides the true strength of the correlation but without indicating its direction. Both of them must be used to fully understand the entire picture regarding correlation's effect.

• The report I received via e mail from Marketocracy for the week ending 2-17-06: "JFR - Joe F. Rocks's Mutual Fund, Net Asset Value (NAV): $14.08 on 2-17 vs $13.83 on 2-10, Compliant: Yes, This past week return: +1.83%." HUI (AMEX Gold Bugs Index) was up +0.99% last week for comparison, so JFR outperformed HUI in 28 of the past 57 weeks. HUI is a better yardstick than NEM or the XAU, since it usually outperforms NEM and the XAU (in upcycles). HUI was up about 70% each year in 2001, 2002, and 2003, so outperforming HUI is no easy task. My imaginary mutual fund JFR is up 40.08% since it's inception on 1-5-05. For the three months ending 2-3-06 my JFR imaginary gold/silver stock fund at Marketocracy (see link) was the 64th best fund. JFR was better than 97.3% of their funds for the past year and was better than 99.4% of their funds for the past six months. I went to about 30% cash near the Wave 3 cycle high, which is near the allowable 35% limit.
  

• XAU Implied Volatility fell -6.38% to 34.115 on Friday 2-17 from 36.440 on 2-16 versus a +1.13% rise in the XAU on 2-17, which is a very sharp (3-6%) +5.25% rise in complacency (-6.38% + +1.13% = -5.25%. The XAU wall of worry shrank by -5.25%, therefore complacency rose by +5.25%) that portends weakness/a downtrend during part of Tuesday 2-21's session (complacency is usually contrarian, therefore normally portends weakness, until it reachs an unusually large level (> 6% increase) where it becomes non contrarian). That weakness/a downtrend could follow a gap up at the open and early strength. XAU Implied Volatility tends to indicate a trend/tone rather than necessarily a simplistic up or down session. The XAU Put/Call Ratio is another very important indicator that may disagree with XAU Implied Volatility. These indicators must be used in concert with cycle channels/trendlines (very long term, long term, intermediate term, and short term).

• The XAU Put/Call Ratio is at 1.07156 for the March expiration on 2-17 versus at 1.30761 for the expired February expiration on 2-17 versus at 1.43135 for the February expiration on 2-10 versus at 1.17922 for the expired January expiration on 1-20 versus at 1.10113 for the January expiration on 1-13 versus at 0.90369 for the expired December expiration on 12-16 versus at 0.78388 for the November expiration on 11-4 versus at 0.80360 for the October expiration on 10-14 versus at 0.84470 for the September expiration on 9-9 versus at 0.85337 for the September expiration on 9-2 versus at 1.02491 for the September expiration on 8-26 versus at 0.73494 for the August expiration on 8-12 versus at 0.81863 for the July expiration on 7-1 versus at 0.91027 for the July expiration on 6-24 versus at 0.76954 for the June expiration on 6-17 versus at 0.87064 for the June expiration on 6-10 versus at 0.80155 for the June expiration on 6-3 versus at 0.55895 (May expiration) on 5-19 versus at 1.13583 (May expiration) on 4-22. The XAU Put/Call Ratio was at 0.65704 for the final January expiration value as of 1-21. The XAU Put/Call Ratio was at 0.79348 for the final December expiration as of 12-17-04. The XAU Put/Call Ratio was at 1.03065 for the final November expiration value as of 11-19-04. The XAU Put/Call Ratio was at 0.85989 for the final October expiration value as of 10-15. If it rises 6% or less it portends strength following likely early weakness (indicated by XAU Implied Volatility). If it falls 6% or less it portends weakness. At unusually large greater than 6% moves the XAU Put/Call Ratio becomes non contrarian, so a greater than 6% rise portends weakness (unusually large rise in fear) and a greater than 6% decline portends strength (unusually large rise in complacency).
  

• A major indicator (NEM Lead Indicator) portending strength this week (but all indicators and cycle channels/trendlines (most important consideration) must be considered collectively, not in isolation. Think "system.") is the fact that NEM outperformed the XAU last week by +2.29% (-2.11%, +0.03%, -0.14%, -4.36%, +2.21%, -1.05%, +0.41%, +0.69%, +2.15%, +1.06%, +1.02%, -1.52%, +1.16%, -1.04%, -1.26%, -1.01%, -0.69%, -0.12%, +0.80%, +0.16%, -0.19%, +1.09%, +0.51%, -1.32%, -0.40%, +0.98%, +0.52%, -0.08%, +0.26%, +0.81%, -0.91%, -1.00%, -2.86%, -0.38%, +0.09%, -0.39%, -0.72%, -0.69%, -1.87%, +0.45%, -2.15%, -1.17%, +0.10%, +1.83%, +0.08%, +0.44%, and +0.97% the prior 47 weeks): +0.02% vs +1.13% on 2-17, +2.52% vs +2.31% on 2-16, -0.62% vs -2.42% on 2-15, +1.98% vs +1.86% on 2-14, -1.30% vs -2.57% on 2-13.        

• The reliable non contrarian (in terms of their trading activity) gold Commercial Traders are short gold. They are clearly positioned for gold weakness (largely because of hedging) with only 108,503 long futures and options contracts versus 265,310 short futures and options contracts (data as of 2-14-06). The Commercial Traders typically correctly begin to take substantial profits (and sell short) as a cycle rolls over/weakens (following cycle parabolic trendline sell signals) while the Speculators tend to overshoot when making the various trading decisions (buying, selling, shorting, short covering).

• The notoriously contrarian (in terms of their trading activity) gold Speculators are correctly positioned for gold strength with 169,316 long futures and options contracts versus only 46,774 short futures and options contracts (data as of 2-14-06).

• The gold Commercial Traders added 4848 (added 4679 the prior week, sold 15,347 the prior week, added 343, 10,554, 13,289, 6357 the prior four weeks,) long futures and options contracts and added 1765 (covered 9233, 18,701, 8435 the prior three weeks, added 11,306, 4626, 3299 the prior three weeks, covered 2036 the prior week) short futures and options contracts which portends strength this week (non contrarian indicator), but the addition of 1765 short futures/options contracts points to some weakness. The most important consideration in timing any market is the cycle channels/trendlines (see chart above) and keep in mind that the data is as of 2-14-06, so the data is somewhat stale (for short term cycle trading) by the time it's analyzed, but is highly useful nonetheless, especially for intermediate term cycle trading (a few weeks/months).

• The gold Speculators (hedge funds and other speculators/traders) sold a large 10,272 (sold 5910 the prior week, added 44 the prior week, sold 6157 the prior week, added 5541, 2975, 1521 the prior three weeks) long futures and options contracts and covered a large 3511 (added 5621, 1047, 1783, 3743, 9445, 5824 the prior six weeks) short futures and options contracts which portends strength this week (contrarian indicator). The most important consideration in timing any market is the cycle channels/trendlines (see chart above). 

• The reliable non contrarian (in terms of their trading activity) silver Commercial Traders are short silver. They are clearly positioned for silver weakness (largely because of hedging) with only 33,678 long futures and options contracts versus 104,083 short futures and options contracts as of 2-14-06. 

• The notoriously contrarian (in terms of their trading activity) silver Speculators are correctly positioned for silver strength with 54,086 long futures and options contracts versus only 7154 short futures and options contracts as of 2-14-06.

• The silver Commercial Traders added 2313 (sold 2508 the prior week, added 1291 the prior week, sold 1760 the prior week, added 10 the prior week, sold 1188 the prior week) long futures and options contracts and covered 723 (covered 4837, 1269 the prior week, 4158 the prior two weeks, added 413 the prior week, covered 1239 the prior week) short futures and options contracts which portends strength this week (non contrarian indicator). The most important consideration in timing any market is the cycle channels/trendlines.

• The silver Speculators (hedge funds and other speculators/traders) sold 4298 (sold 4051, 291 the prior two weeks, added 2413 the prior week, sold 350, 1735, 2219 the prior three weeks, added 1565 the prior week) long futures and options contracts and covered 1767 (covered 9 the prior week, added 2570, 1465, 150 the prior three weeks, covered 1376, 1031 the prior two weeks) short futures and options contracts which portends strength this week (contrarian indicator). The most important consideration in timing any market is the cycle channels/trendlines.

• The reliable non contrarian (in terms of their trading activity) USD Commercial Traders are positioned for US Dollar weakness (massively net short) with 9795 long futures and options contracts versus 22,122 short futures and options contracts as of 2-14-06. Last week they sold an unusually large (> 10% decrease in long contracts) 2011 (sold 1320, 978 the prior two weeks, added 2134, 1893, 1148, 1525 the prior four weeks) long futures and options contracts and added an unusually large (> 10% increase in short contracts) 4614 (added 1966 the prior week, covered 20 the prior week, added 395, 951 the prior two weeks, covered 5422 the prior week) short futures and options contracts which portends strength this week (non contrarian indicator), because the unusually large net short increase is a short term contrarian indication. The most important consideration in timing any market is the cycle channels/trendlines (see chart above).
  

• The notoriously contrarian (in terms of their trading activity) USD Speculators are positioned for US Dollar strength (massively net long) with 15,269 long futures and options contracts versus 3082 short futures and options contracts as of 2-14-06. Last week they added an unusually large (> 10% increase in long contracts) 4207 (added 213, 408, 343 the prior three weeks, sold 82, 4033 the prior two weeks, added 959 the prior week, sold 309, 7347, 1970 the prior three weeks) long futures and options contracts and covered an unusually large (> 10% decrease in short contracts) 1928 (covered 1668 the prior week, added 129, 1206, 126, 1657, 1459 the prior five weeks, covered 690, 653 the prior two weeks) short futures and options contracts which portends USD strength this week (contrarian indicator), because the unusually large net long increase is a short term non contrarian indication. The most important consideration in timing any market is the cycle channels/trendlines (see chart above).
  

• FREE COT (Commitments of Traders) Charts (see link) reveal that the Commercial Traders generally know what they're doing and the Speculators don't. The Commercial Traders tend to be near net short extremes near major tops and near net long extremes near major bottoms, thus making them non contrarian indicators most of the time. The Speculators tend to do just the opposite and are contrarian indicators most of the time.

• Detailed analysis regarding the important long term upcycle buy signal and other important "big picture" information as well as information about my system/indicators can be found at this link.
  

• Cycle channels and trendlines are the primary market timing consideration (other tools/indicators are great for finetuning), except the NEM Lead Indicator is (really only) needed for major buy signals when the potential major cycle low occurs well above the next longer cycle's trendline, such as occurred on May 10, 2004 when long term cycle lows occurred for HUI, NEM, and the XAU well above their very long term upcycle trendlines in place since late 2000 (see top chart above). Since May 16, 2005's major intermediate term cycle low occurred right at the very long term upcycle trendline for the XAU (see 5 year chart dated 7-12-05), the NEM lead Indicator wasn't really required (in addition to the 5% follow through requirement), but given how long and brutal the (major intermediate term downcycle from 11-17-04 until 5-16-05) correction was we needed all the confidence we could get. In other words, if HUI, NEM, and the XAU bounce dramatically at their Bull Market/very long term upcycle trendlines or long term upcycle trendlines and 5% or more follow through occurs after breaking their major downcycle trendlines, that strongly suggests that the next longer cycle remains in effect and that a major buy signal has occurred.
  

• The 5% follow through requirement combined with the NEM Lead Indicator, the two new major buy/sell signal requirements, would have weeded out all six important cycle lows that occurred prior to 5-16-05 in the major correction (from 11-17-04 until 5-16-05), and, correctly indicated that 5-16-05 was a major intermediate term cycle low. So, the two new major buy/sell signal requirements worked seven consecutive times and there's only a 0.78% chance that result was due to pure luck (50% raised to the seventh power).

• My system/work is NOT about me making educated guesses and calling bottoms, even though I (mistakenly) did that in the major correction from 11-17-04 until 5-16-05 for HUI, NEM, and the XAU, partly for reasons such as HUI having, until early April 2005, a well developed trendline since 5-10-04's long term cycle low that appeared to be it's long term upcycle trendline. The reason why I'm developing a backtested system ("Trade the Cycles") is because it's impossible to consistently time the market (by educated guessing) using an unbacktested approach comprised of technical analysis and indicators. From now on, where major bottoms are concerned, I'll only indicate that a likely major bottom has occurred after the two major buy signal criteria are satisfied (The 5% follow through requirement in concert with a clearly bullish NEM Lead Indicator for a few weeks), which would have weeded out all 6 important cycle lows (see next bullet) that occurred during the major intermediate term downcycle from being major intermediate term cycle low candidates, and there's only a 1.56% probability that was the result of pure luck (50% raised to the sixth power). Assuming that May 16, 2005 really was a major intermediate term cycle low then the two major buy signal requirements will have been effective 7 consecutive times and there's only a 0.78% chance that was the result of pure luck (50% raised to the seventh power).

• The 5% follow through major buy signal requirement (after breaking through the intermediate term downcycle trendline connecting short term cycle highs) weeds out the December 8, 2004, January 6, 2005, March 29, 2005, April 15, 2005, and the April 28 cycle lows from being a major intermediate term cycle low, but not the February 8 (HUI/XAU)/9 (NEM) 2005 cycle low. However, the NEM Lead Indicator clearly indicated (weeds out) that the February 2005 cycle low probably wasn't a major low. It appears that the 5% follow through requirement in concert with a clearly bullish NEM Lead Indicator for a few weeks will work well for timing/major buy signals. Also, an Elliot Wave type A, B, C major correction pattern is likely to occur, with point C, the major cycle low, occurring relatively close to the Bull Market/very long term upcycle trendline, which helps.
  

• Buying and holding major intermediate term upcycles (that last about 3 to 12 months) makes a lot of sense, but not long term or very long term upcycles, because they're too flat (rising bottoms) and one loses too much during major corrections (However, with good stock selection, one can do very well with buy and hold during this gold/silver stock Bull Market/very long term upcycle that began in late 2000). This is a change from my belief that one should hold during long term upcycles. One should wait for a major intermediate term cycle buy signal before buying. So, it makes sense to be long during major intermediate term cycle buy signals and in cash and/or short during major intermediate term cycle sell signals.
  

• Cycle channels/trendlines are the most important consideration when timing any market. A very long term upcycle has been in place since late 2000 and a long term upcycle has been in place since May 10, 2004 for HUI, NEM, and the XAU (gold began a very long term upcycle in April 2001). Very long term upcycles (and downcycles) tend to last about 17.5 years on average. Gold's previous very long term downcycle lasted from 1980 until April 2001.

• As I've said before, if you find that the detailed technical work is too much to digest, the cycle channels/trendlines in the charts are by far the most important consideration, so one can still use my system even if the indicators/technical work are difficult to grasp (right now, sometimes with perseverance one might grasp it).

• The Gold:XAU Ratio may become a third major buy/sell signal signal criterion, along with 5% follow through and a clearly bullish/bearish NEM Lead Indicator. Per Myles Zyblock, Chief North American Institutional Strategist at RBC Capital Markets, when it's above 5.0 (12% of the time the past 22 years) the average annual one-year holding period return for stocks in the XAU has been +38.4% and in only one instance was there a loss. When it's below 3.0 (5% of the time the past 22 years) the average annual one-year holding period return for stocks in the XAU has been -24.3% with no instances of an up year. As a stand alone indicator, at least for trading purposes, the Gold:XAU Ratio probably isn't highly useful because obviously both gold and the XAU can fall 10% or more in tandem after reaching 5.0 or rise 10%+ after reaching 3.0. However, I need to research/backtest this. 5.25 or even 5.50 is probably a better criterion.
  

• I've created a Joe F. Rocks imaginary mutual fund at Marketocracy that will trade gold/silver stocks and maybe also precious metals via Exchange Traded Funds (ETF) like GLD (new gold ETF) using my "Trade the Cycles" system. The Fund Manager name should say Joe Ferrazzano not  "joefrocks." I bought "en masse" on 1-5-05 and was more than 90% invested on that date. This will be a way of establishing an independently calculated track record. I'll track it's performance weekly in these updates, but the link above updates the fund share price/NAV the day after each session I believe.  

• The Joe F. Rocks fund at Marketocracy will provide a great independently tracked way of assessing "Trade the Cycles" as well as my trading ability and you can compare me to other market timers. I think I have a great shot at being very near the top of Marketocracy's rankings in the near future, partly because of how great the gold/silver stock market is, but also because of my "Trade the Cycles" system. Given how volatile gold/silver stocks are it would be easy to have a substandard rate of return relative to HUI and the XAU if one wasn't good at timing gold/silver stocks. I'll be doing mostly intermediate term cycle trading (cycles that last about 4-6 weeks from cycle low to the next cycle low) and some short term cycle trading. Once the long term cycle high occurs probably in about 6 to 12 months I'll be 35% in cash and will find low volatility stocks to park most of the rest of the fund. I have to be at least 65% invested, which ties my hands some, but I should still do very well. Margin and short selling aren't allowed by Marketocracy because they're following typical mutual fund guidelines. I could end up running a real mutual fund for them if I rank very high.
  

Joe F. Rocks!

-- Posted Monday, 20 February 2006 | Digg This Article