LIVE Gold Prices $  | E-Mail Subscriptions | Update GoldSeek | GoldSeek Radio 

Commentary : Gold Review : Markets : News Wire : Quotes : Silver : Stocks - Main Page 

 GoldSeek.com >> News >> Story  Disclaimer 
 
Latest Headlines

GoldSeek.com to Launch New Website
By: GoldSeek.com

Is Gold Price Action Warning Of Imminent Monetary Collapse Part 2?
By: Hubert Moolman

Gold and Silver Are Just Getting Started
By: Frank Holmes, US Funds

Silver Makes High Wave Candle at Target – Here’s What to Expect…
By: Clive Maund

Gold Blows Through Upside Resistance - The Chase Is On
By: Avi Gilburt

U.S. Mint To Reduce Gold & Silver Eagle Production Over The Next 12-18 Months
By: Steve St. Angelo, SRSrocco Report

Gold's sharp rise throws Financial Times into an erroneous sulk
By: Chris Powell, GATA

Precious Metals Update Video: Gold's unusual strength
By: Ira Epstein

Asian Metals Market Update: July-29-2020
By: Chintan Karnani, Insignia Consultants

Gold's rise is a 'mystery' because journalism always fails to pursue it
By: Chris Powell, GATA

 
Search

GoldSeek Web

 
An E-Mini Trade About to Go Bad?

By: Rick Ackerman, Rick's Picks


-- Posted Thursday, 26 May 2011 | | Disqus

Rick’s Picks

Thursday, May 26, 2011

“Phenomenally accurate forecasts”

 

Yesterday’s rally in the broad averages presented a dilemma for us, since we’ve been short the E-Mini S&P futures from 1358.25 and had a paper profit of $2800 per contract at the intraday low.  Even more problematical was that we fully expected the futures to reverse direction from within a hair of that low, and to do so sharply enough to warrant initiating a long position there.  Earlier in the week, with the futures trading around 1315, we had advised subscribers to look for a bottom at exactly 1303.25, and to bid there with an extremely tight stop-loss, at 1302.50. Lo, the futures fell in the wee hours Wednesday morning to 1302.25, stopping us out for a minuscule loss before they turned and ran 20 points higher into day’s end. Should we have covered the short position, since we’d anticipated the reversal ? 

 

 

Ordinarily, the answer would be “yes,” since we adhere obsessively to a risk management strategy that holds risk:reward constant at 1:3 in each and every trade, from entry till exit. In this case, however, we had resolved to let the position run until such time as it produced a theoretical gain of at least $5000 per contract. We are sticking to that plan for now, come hell or high water – swinging for the fences, as it were, even if it means giving up the $2800 of theoretical profit that we had within our grasp at yesterday’s lows.

 

Anticipating yesterday’s run-up, we had sought to “protect” our short position in the E-Mini futures by doing a trade “against-the-box.”  To make this strategy easier, we suggested buying, not E-Mini futures against those we are already short, but call options on QQQ. Specifically, we recommended buying June 56 QQQ calls if the underlying vehicle came down to a Hidden Pivot target at 56.02 equivalent to the one at 1303.25 we’d flagged in the E-Mini S&P. Unfortunately, it was not possible to initiate the trade as suggested, since options on “the Cubes” don’t trade overnight, when the S&Ps were bottoming. So instead of putting on an equity-option hedge when the S&Ps were at their lows yesterday, we were left naked short the E-Minis by circumstances.

 

Screw Risk Management!

 

There’s a couple of reasons why we decided to toss the usual risk:reward constraints out the window.  In the first place, the short that we initiated at 1358.25 seemed like an excellent place to take a bearish stand. It turned out to be the week’s exact high, and we still think it will be prove to have been an important one.  For the record, on May 2 we’d attempted another speculative short at a Hidden Pivot rally target at 1371.25 that we’d identified weeks earlier. The actual top occurred that day at 1373.50, and although it should have been a winner, we stupidly advised a too-tight stop-loss at 1372.25.  This bad advice would have caused Rick’s Picks subscribers to miss the so-far peak of the Mother of All Bear Rallies by a hair-pulling 1.50 points.  In suggesting another short from 1358.25 nine days layer, we were seeking to make amends for blowing the earlier opportunity. 

 

Ask ‘Em Yourself

 

Incidentally, if you want to find out how successful we’ve been at shorting every Hidden Pivot rally target of consequence over the last few months, try asking subscribers yourself in our 24/7 chat room. Some great traders frequent the room, and there are usually dozens of subscribers on hand who have taken the Hidden Pivot webinar.  If you don’t subscribe, just click here for a free trial that will give you access to all areas of the Rick’s Picks web site, including the chat room and our daily trading “touts.”

 

One final note:  If the futures were to run all the way back up to 1358.25, stopping us out of the trade, it is likely that we would still book a small gain. That’s because we told subscribers to take a partial paper profit early on in the trade, effectively raising our cost basis to 1363.00 for any contracts still held.  We also told subscribers who shorted more than two contracts initially to cover all but the last third of the position at 1310.00.

 

***

 

Information and commentary contained herein comes from sources believed to be reliable, but this cannot be guaranteed. Past performance should not be construed as an indicator of future results, so let the buyer beware. There is a substantial risk of loss in futures and option trading, and even experts can, and sometimes do, lose their proverbial shirts.  Rick's Picks does not provide investment advice to individuals, nor act as an investment advisor, nor individually advocate the purchase or sale of any security or investment. From time to time, its editor may hold positions in issues referred to in this service, and he may alter or augment them at any time. Investments recommended herein should be made only after consulting with your investment advisor, and only after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company. Rick's Picks reserves the right to use e-mail endorsements and/or profit claims from its subscribers for marketing purposes. All names will be kept anonymous and only subscribers’ initials will be used unless express written permission has been granted to the contrary. All Contents © 2011, Rick Ackerman. All Rights Reserved. www.rickackerman.com 


-- Posted Thursday, 26 May 2011 | Digg This Article | Source: GoldSeek.com

comments powered by Disqus



 



Increase Text SizeDecrease Text SizeE-mail Link of Current PagePrinter Friendly PageReturn to GoldSeek.com

 news.goldseek.com >> Story

E-mail Page  | Print  | Disclaimer 


© 1995 - 2019



GoldSeek.com Supports Kiva.org

© GoldSeek.com, Gold Seek LLC

The content on this site is protected by U.S. and international copyright laws and is the property of GoldSeek.com and/or the providers of the content under license. By "content" we mean any information, mode of expression, or other materials and services found on GoldSeek.com. This includes editorials, news, our writings, graphics, and any and all other features found on the site. Please contact us for any further information.

Live GoldSeek Visitor Map | Disclaimer


Map

The views contained here may not represent the views of GoldSeek.com, Gold Seek LLC, its affiliates or advertisers. GoldSeek.com, Gold Seek LLC makes no representation, warranty or guarantee as to the accuracy or completeness of the information (including news, editorials, prices, statistics, analyses and the like) provided through its service. Any copying, reproduction and/or redistribution of any of the documents, data, content or materials contained on or within this website, without the express written consent of GoldSeek.com, Gold Seek LLC, is strictly prohibited. In no event shall GoldSeek.com, Gold Seek LLC or its affiliates be liable to any person for any decision made or action taken in reliance upon the information provided herein.