LIVE Gold Prices $  | E-Mail Subscriptions | Update GoldSeek | GoldSeek Radio 

Commentary : Gold Review : Markets : News Wire : Quotes : Silver : Stocks - Main Page 

 GoldSeek.com >> News >> Story  Disclaimer 
 
Latest Headlines

GoldSeek.com to Launch New Website
By: GoldSeek.com

Is Gold Price Action Warning Of Imminent Monetary Collapse Part 2?
By: Hubert Moolman

Gold and Silver Are Just Getting Started
By: Frank Holmes, US Funds

Silver Makes High Wave Candle at Target – Here’s What to Expect…
By: Clive Maund

Gold Blows Through Upside Resistance - The Chase Is On
By: Avi Gilburt

U.S. Mint To Reduce Gold & Silver Eagle Production Over The Next 12-18 Months
By: Steve St. Angelo, SRSrocco Report

Gold's sharp rise throws Financial Times into an erroneous sulk
By: Chris Powell, GATA

Precious Metals Update Video: Gold's unusual strength
By: Ira Epstein

Asian Metals Market Update: July-29-2020
By: Chintan Karnani, Insignia Consultants

Gold's rise is a 'mystery' because journalism always fails to pursue it
By: Chris Powell, GATA

 
Search

GoldSeek Web

 
James Turk: $720 Gold in Two Months


By: John Rubino, DollarCollapse.com




-- Posted Tuesday, 6 March 2007 | Digg This ArticleDigg It!

All you worried goldbugs out there, repeat after me: Corrections happen. Every bull market has lots of 5%-10% squiggles that look like the end of the world to those who don’t understand, and like entry points to those who do.

GoldMoney’s James Turk devotes a page of his latest FreeMarket Gold & Money Report to the proposition that the secular bull market in precious metals (and the secular decline in the dollar) is alive and well. Here’s some of what James had to say: 

Both gold and silver were hit hard this past week. It’s the same story we have seen many times before. As gold climbed in price, we witnessed in recent weeks the huge build-up of open interest on the Comex. The gold cartel, which is a group of bullion banks acting under the direction of the US government, was selling whatever paper promises (i.e., futures contracts, which are simply paper representations of gold but not gold itself) it felt were needed to try slowing and then capping gold’s advance.

The weekly reports prepared by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission clearly show this intervention. The CFTC reports all short positions based on the size of the firms that hold them, and some large firms are members of the gold cartel. So the huge jump in the short positions of the large commercial firms reveals the gold cartel’s handiwork. After throwing enough paper at the market, the gold cartel finally succeeded in capping gold. They were unsuccessful in the $640s and $660s, but after adding thousands of futures contracts that caused open interest to balloon to new highs, the gold cartel stopped gold in the $680s.

Then the rout began. Gold dropped four days-in-a-row, losing $45 or 6.6% in the process. Fortunately, there was no serious long-term technical damage to gold’s chart – nor do I expect any in the days and weeks ahead. Any reversal of gold’s major uptrend is unlikely because the gold cartel is already covering short positions at these prices, which will provide underlying support for gold. More importantly, the same fundamental factors that have been driving gold higher for years remain in place.


 


In fact, the volatility in the stock market and growing nervousness about asset quality of the banks and brokers involved with sub-prime mortgages is another reason to own gold. Their deteriorating asset quality means that a financial panic is becoming increasing likely, and could perhaps be similar to any of those panics we saw in the 1980s as banks collapsed because of imprudent loans.

The gold market doesn’t need a financial panic to climb higher. Gold remains well below the price it would be trading if  government-led gold cartel wasn’t regularly intervening to keep gold as low as it can. But we can take solace from the fact that gold is in a long-term uptrend, clearly indicating that the gold cartel is losing the war.

Turning to the above gold chart, I draw attention again to the two red circles that I have been mentioning in recent letters. But note that I have also added two red rectangles to this chart. Note what happened to gold back in 2005 after breaking out from the first red circle. It shot up, and then went into a severe downdraft. It was another gold cartel attack, but gold quickly reversed and continued within the major uptrend then underway.

Will the same pattern repeat? No one of course knows, but readers of these letters know that I always put a lot of emphasis on past results. Markets often do repeat, etching out similar trading patterns on the charts. So if history does repeat, we are at or near the low, and gold will rocket higher from here. The gold cartel has probably taken gold as low as they can on this move because it deals primarily in the paper gold market. Right now the demand for physical gold is strong, and these buyers don’t want paper promises from the gold cartel. They want metal. The gold cartel only dishoards gold from central bank coffers sparingly. They prefer to threaten dishoarding rather than actually do it, because they recognize that their gold is essential, so they only part with it reluctantly and infrequently. Consequently, the physical gold demanded by buyers in China and elsewhere throughout the world has to come from somewhere. It comes from people who already own it, but are only willing to part with it at a higher price. So either dishoarded central bank gold or higher prices are needed to keep the market in balance, i.e., the price of physical gold consistent with the price of paper gold.

Even though I have been and remain bullish, in the last letter I advised not to “go out and bet the ranch” because the “gold
cartel has been out in force, trying to cap the gold price.” In other words, I do not recommend using leverage if you choose to trade gold (i.e., trying to profit from its price fluctuations, in contrast to the long-term wealth accumulation strategy of buying gold month-in and month-out). Leverage is dangerous, as we saw over the past four days. No doubt there were a lot of margin calls issued, with the consequence that there was much forced selling. But the capping by the gold cartel and the subsequent rush for liquidity does not diminish gold’s long-term prospects, a fact no doubt understood by the long-term accumulators of physical metal who now find gold significantly cheaper than it was just a short week ago.

Gold did not reach my $720 target by the end of February. But I expect that we will see that price soon enough, probably within the next two months.


-- Posted Tuesday, 6 March 2007 | Digg This Article








 



Increase Text SizeDecrease Text SizeE-mail Link of Current PagePrinter Friendly PageReturn to GoldSeek.com

 news.goldseek.com >> Story

E-mail Page  | Print  | Disclaimer 


© 1995 - 2019



GoldSeek.com Supports Kiva.org

© GoldSeek.com, Gold Seek LLC

The content on this site is protected by U.S. and international copyright laws and is the property of GoldSeek.com and/or the providers of the content under license. By "content" we mean any information, mode of expression, or other materials and services found on GoldSeek.com. This includes editorials, news, our writings, graphics, and any and all other features found on the site. Please contact us for any further information.

Live GoldSeek Visitor Map | Disclaimer


Map

The views contained here may not represent the views of GoldSeek.com, Gold Seek LLC, its affiliates or advertisers. GoldSeek.com, Gold Seek LLC makes no representation, warranty or guarantee as to the accuracy or completeness of the information (including news, editorials, prices, statistics, analyses and the like) provided through its service. Any copying, reproduction and/or redistribution of any of the documents, data, content or materials contained on or within this website, without the express written consent of GoldSeek.com, Gold Seek LLC, is strictly prohibited. In no event shall GoldSeek.com, Gold Seek LLC or its affiliates be liable to any person for any decision made or action taken in reliance upon the information provided herein.