LIVE Gold Prices $  | E-Mail Subscriptions | Update GoldSeek | GoldSeek Radio 

Commentary : Gold Review : Markets : News Wire : Quotes : Silver : Stocks - Main Page >> News >> Story  Disclaimer 
Latest Headlines to Launch New Website

Is Gold Price Action Warning Of Imminent Monetary Collapse Part 2?
By: Hubert Moolman

Gold and Silver Are Just Getting Started
By: Frank Holmes, US Funds

Silver Makes High Wave Candle at Target – Here’s What to Expect…
By: Clive Maund

Gold Blows Through Upside Resistance - The Chase Is On
By: Avi Gilburt

U.S. Mint To Reduce Gold & Silver Eagle Production Over The Next 12-18 Months
By: Steve St. Angelo, SRSrocco Report

Gold's sharp rise throws Financial Times into an erroneous sulk
By: Chris Powell, GATA

Precious Metals Update Video: Gold's unusual strength
By: Ira Epstein

Asian Metals Market Update: July-29-2020
By: Chintan Karnani, Insignia Consultants

Gold's rise is a 'mystery' because journalism always fails to pursue it
By: Chris Powell, GATA


GoldSeek Web

Dead and Buried, But Not Forgotten

-- Posted Tuesday, 5 August 2008 | Digg This ArticleDigg It! | Source:

The August Big Picture at details constructive steps explaining in layman’s terms how investors can preserve net worth and insulate their investment portfolios from our current systemic financial troubles. That and more thought provoking analysis.  Subscribe here.


Last August the 18th – 2007, a Saturday, Catherine Austin Fitts was interviewed on COAST TO COAST AM by Ian Punnett. The subject matter was the US Tapeworm Economy & Black Budgets.


During the interview, Fitts recounted a meeting she chaired back in the late 1990’s [April of 1997].  The meeting was an advisory board meeting [for pension fund managers] sponsored by a subsidiary of her [then] company, Hamilton Securities Group.  In broad terms, Fitts was lecturing the attendees as to actionable steps that might be taken to help restore financial responsibility and integrity to the financial system.


In response, Fitts revealed that a senior manager from CalPERS [California Public Employees Pension] responded to her that,


“Don’t you realize……It’s too late……..They’ve [who ever “they” are] already given up on America!”  They’re moving all the money off-shore [presumably to Asia]”.


Rob Kirby was so curious just who this individual was – the dude from CalPERS who claimed to posses this knowledge – that he contacted Catherine Austin Fitts directly and asked just who this individual was?


Fitts revealed to him in writing that this “fine gentleman” was none other than Bill Crist – then president of CalPERS.  In Fitts’ own words,


“In April 1997, we had an advisory board meeting at Safeguard Scientifics where the board chair led a venture capital effort. I gave a presentation on the extraordinary waste in the federal budget. As an example, we demonstrated why we estimated that the prior year’s federal investment in the Philadelphia, Pennsylvania area had a negative return on investment. It was, however, possible to finance places with private equity and then reengineer the government investment to a positive return and, as a result, generate significant capital gains. Hence, it was possible to use U.S. pension funds to increase retirees’ retirement security significantly by investing in American communities, small business and farms — all in a manner that would reduce debt and improve skills and job creation. This was important as one of the chief financial concerns in America at that time was ensuring that our retirement plans performed financially to a standard that would meet the needs of beneficiaries and retirees. It was also critical to reduce debt and create new jobs as we continued to move manufacturing and other employment abroad. If not, we would be using our workforce’s retirement savings to finance moving their jobs and their children’s jobs abroad.


The response from the pension fund investors was quite positive until the President of the CalPers pension fund — the largest in the country — said, “You don’t understand. It’s too late. They have given up on the country. They are moving all the money out in the fall (of 1997). They are moving it to Asia.” He did not say who “they” were but did indicate that it was urgent that I see Nick Brady — as if our data that indicated that there was hope for the country might make a difference. I thought at the time that he meant that the pension funds and other institutional investors would be shifting a much higher portion of their investment portfolios to emerging markets. I was naive. He was referring to something much more significant.



In June 2001 the Senate Governmental Affairs Committee, under the leadership of Senator Fred Thompson (R-TN), published its study, "Government at the Brink." [1] The study describes the failure of federal government agencies to maintain reliable financial systems and/or to publish required independent annual audited financial statements. The President's initial 2002 budget (before increases for 9-11) proposed that approximately 85% of all federal appropriations be awarded to the very same agencies the Thompson study states either (a) fail to maintain reliable financial systems, (b) fail to publish trustworthy or, in some cases, any, independent certified financial statements (as required by law), or both. [2]

Reports from sources like agency inspectors general and government whistleblowers charge that the problems are much deeper than mere accounting: they allege stolen and missing inventory (planes, tanks, etc.) and in some cases actually admit that they rely on black budget funding (i.e., funding that is "off balance sheet" and not subject to Congressional oversight). The existence of such reports requires that we ask whether the very government officials and contractors who are paid handsomely to protect and manage our resources in accordance with the law are looting the federal government.

Taken together, this insight suggests that “someone” or some group is in possession of a vast sum of [illicit “off balance sheet” perhaps?] money – so large, if moved, to do serious damage to the U.S. economy – according to someone [Bill Christ] highly qualified to have an opinion on such matters.

Catherine Fitts – a true American National Treasure of under appreciated and under recognized brilliance – caught on to “the game” of how this is done early on.   Her background, which gave her the unique perspective and qualifications to understand all this, includes:

  • Investment Advisor: Founder and managing member of Solari Investment Advisory Services, LLC.
  • Entrepreneur: President of The Hamilton Securities Group, investment bank and financial software developer.
  • Government Official: Assistant Secretary of Housing - Federal Housing Commissioner, Bush I.
  • Investment Banker: Managing Director and member of the board of Wall Street firm Dillon Read & Co. Inc.

Catherine has designed and closed over $25 billion of transactions and investments to-date and has led portfolio strategy for $300 billion of financial assets and liabilities.

Catherine's experiences on Wall Street and in Wasington D.C. are chronicled in Dillon Read and the Aristocracy of Stock Profits:

"Long ago, I made a promise that I would never act against the best interests or the excellence of my own people—that I would do my best to ensure that we were worthy of the stewardship of our world and that we did our best to leave a better world for generations yet to come. To make and keep such a promise is to understand that money and position are tools, not goals, and that death is not the worst thing that can happen. Some would probably accuse me of 'fighting the tape' and not being 'good at the game.' I would tell those people that now is not the time in the history of our people for a failure of imagination."


So Where Do Vast Amounts of Illicit Money Come From?


From her investment banker’s perch with experience in both Wall Street and cleaning up mortgage fraud in Washington, Fitts realized that illegal proceeds from crime were regularly being “laundered” through Wall Street conduits. 


Folks need to realize that the Federal Reserve collects and analyzes data on all macro monetary flows.  What this means is this:  the Federal Reserve would most likely be required to be a willing participant, or willfully negligent, if any extra-ordinarily large flows of illicit fiat money were moving through “THEIR” system without them blowing the whistle, so to speak.  We know this to be fact if we are going to accept the position put forward by officialdom -  that they can and did accurately ‘track’ the financial trail of minute cash advances and purchases of alleged plane hijackers, in the amounts of hundreds or thousands.  Are we to believe that this can be accomplished but they are UNABLE to give us the real deal on proceeds of crime – flowing through their system - in the amounts of billions and / or Trillions?   From official gov't reports:

In addition to staging actual terrorist attacks in partnership with al Qaeda, Hambali and JI assisted al Qaeda operatives passing through Kuala Lumpur. One important occasion was in December 1999-January 2000. Hambali accommodated KSM's requests to help several veterans whom KSM had just finished training in Karachi. They included Tawfiq bin Attash, also known as Khallad, who later would help bomb the USS Cole, and future 9/11 hijackers Nawaf al Hazmi and Khalid al Mihdhar. Hambali arranged lodging for them and helped them purchase airline tickets for their onward travel. Later that year, Hambali and his crew would provide accommodations and other assistance (including information on flight schools and help in acquiring ammonium nitrate) for Zacarias Moussaoui, an al Qaeda operative sent to Malaysia by Atef and KSM.25

Note the intimate detail of who exactly aid for what and when they paid for it on multiple transactions in obscure locations at obscure times!!!!!


In her book, Dillon Read and the Aristocracy of Stock Profits, Fitts chronicles a gamut of unsavory financial dealings - most dealing with the lobbying for and cleansing of globally generated narco-Dollars:



People widely regarded and understood as reputable do engage in reprehensible activities. Richard Grasso [former NYSE Chairman] hugging a FARC Commander in 1999 in a rebel village in Colombia at the time the GAO reported that FARC had assumed control of a majority market share of the Colombian cocaine trade. (Photo courtesy LaRouche Campaign)


But it was from Fitts’ time in government where she really gained a better understanding as to the level or degree of corruption and abuse of power:


As Assistant Secretary for Housing-Federal Housing Commissioner, [she] was responsible for the operations of the Federal Housing Administration (FHA), which was the largest mortgage insurance fund in the world. FHA at that time had annual originations of $50-100 billion of mortgage insurance and an outstanding portfolio of $320 billion of mortgage insurance, mortgages and properties. Leading the FHA necessitated significant understanding of how homes are built, how mortgages finance thousands of communities throughout America and how investors finance the process by buying securities in pools of mortgages. [Her] responsibilities included the production and management of assisted private housing; management of an organization of 7,000 employees in 80 offices nationwide; and development of network information systems and tools. In addition, [she] served as advisor to the Secretary of HUD on financial markets regulatory responsibilities, including the RTC Oversight Board, Federal Housing Finance Board and Home Loan Bank Board System, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.


When [she] told Nick Brady in 1989 that [she] was going to work at HUD, he said, “You can’t go to HUD — HUD is a sewer.” While [her] experience as Assistant Secretary cleaning up significant mortgage fraud that lost the government billions during the 1980s confirmed that HUD’s financial reputation was deserved, leading the FHA provided invaluable insight into how government management of the economy one neighborhood at a time really harms communities.


The lewd dealings that Fitts uncovered during her time in government, and later as a principal of Hamilton Securities; they centered on the fraudulent and overt abuse of mortgage bonds along with the sovereign credit of the U.S.A.  Due to the dollar volumes involved – she eventually realized were operationally funding “black budgets”.


What wasn’t readily apparent to Fitts was how deep the rot was.  As Assistant Secretary for Housing-Federal Housing Commissioner she had been ordered to clean this mess up and institute structural reforms so that such fraud could not happen again.  It was not until after leaving government and starting her own securities firm [Hamilton] and becoming a government contractor that her life was “made a living hell”, spending thirteen years and six million dollars litigating successfully with the Federal Government who tried to refuse to pay their bills using bogus investigations as a pretext. 


From all of this, one might be led to the conclusion that there are and were folks in very high places that did not appreciate successful efforts to help ensure that the Federal Mortgage Programs were run legally. 


Clean operations stood in the way of a new housing bubble.


It was Fitts’ revelations and commentary regarding corruption and abuse in fixed income [mortgage bond] arena that drew the attention of Kirby’s research and interest. This was a natural since Kirby spent roughly 15 years of his working life employed in institutional sales as a money market, interest rate derivatives and bond broker.  Prior to his becoming aware of her work in this area, his own proprietary forensic macro-economic research was much more focused toward irregularities and document-able Central Bank malfeasance in the global gold market.


Their two paths crossed naturally, partly due to his own brand of macro-economic research and also due to her serving as a director of GATA [short for Gold Anti-Trust Action Committee] – chaired by William [Bill] Murphy.


With sub-prime mortgages being “front and centre” in the news lately, it was no wonder that Ms. Fitts recently penned this short quip which was published at


                                                       Mortgage Market Musing

Catherine Austin Fitts

Sometimes, it helps to step back and see the big picture.


Let’s say that I serve as the depository for a large government and I also own the central bank. I get my partners appointed to run the government’s treasury and key funds on a regular basis so I can also control financial system policies and regulation that help me finance what I want to do and mess up my competitors. Even that is getting cumbersome so I am arranging to move most of the regulatory control over to my central bank because I can control all of it privately.


Frustrated with having to deal with democratic processes, I decide to move a significant amount of money out of the government between 1997 and 2001 for reinvestment abroad. I and my partners and our syndicates engineer a series of steps to bubble the economy so that when I move the money out the currency is high and because everyone was making money they did not notice that lots of capital was leaving. To ensure no one notices, I suppress the gold price which turns off the financial burglar alarm and shifts gold out of the government into my private control at below market prices.


Normally moving money out of a government in excess of the total taxes that year would be hard to do. However, I could use securities fraud. I could issue a lot more government securities and government agency (like mortgage agencies) securities than I recorded on the government books and sell them abroad. I would have to make sure not to publish audited financial statements as that would increase the liabilities of engaging in this kind of fraud. It would help a lot if I could pool mortgages and sell government agency securities to finance those mortgages in a process where the same mortgage could be sold many times into the same pool. Investors would not notice or care because the securities were government guaranteed.


I also engineer an internet and telecom stock bubble, and move trillions more out through that mechanism.


OK, so as I move the money out of the country at a high price because my currency is high, what do I invest? Well if places like Asia, Latin America and Russia experience economic crashes as a result of credit crunches that result as my cutting off credit, then their currencies will be low and they will welcome investment. Or if they don’t welcome investment, I can make sure that the IMF and World Bank can strong arm.

So I can buy in really, really cheap. Meantime, these currencies rise as I move manufacturing and jobs into the places where I now have big investment positions. So my investments go up.


Well, back in the U.S. the bubble bursts, and the institutions like Fannie and Freddie that financed the housing bubble experience significant losses. Their stocks drop by a lot. That hits the pension funds, 401ks, IRAs and other savings of the people who have lost money on their homes. It’s a double whammy. A lot of them also lose their jobs. Triple whammy.


The currency drops in value a lot. This means that the dollar I pulled out and put into other currency that has been going up, up, up, is now worth multiple dollars. As asset values drop, each remaining dollar can buy things cheaply.


Indeed, with Fannie and Freddie’s stock dropping like a stone, I could have one or more of my offshore investment vehicles fund a recapitalization plan and buy control of the senior positions directly or indirectly controlling 50% of the residential mortgages in the country with my profits — that is for a small portion of that which I shifted out of the government.


Think of it. The housing bubble has reached its logical conclusion. If you can get enough people to buy a home for no money down, you can buy their country for no money down.


Over the course of the past couple of years, a background as an interest rate derivatives [swaps] broker along with the mushrooming size of J.P. Morgan Chase’s derivatives book [high-water mark, so far, of 92+ Trillion in notional at Q3/07] – the lion’s share of it being interest rate swaps – both alarmed and garnered Kirby’s attention. 


In this regard, what folks need to understand is that “if hedged” – interest rate swaps of duration between 3 and 10 years virtually always have a government bond trade imbedded in them.  This raised the specter of whether or not J.P. Morgan’s 80 or so Trillion worth of Interest Rate Swaps are “hedged” or whether the institution is taking a “naked punt” of staggering proportions. The conclusion he reached after researching the topic – J.P. Morgan, through regular daily activity in their swap book, is engaged in the on-going trade of government bonds that CANNOT LOGICALLY or LEGALLY EXIST.


Rob Kirby formally presented his findings in this regard in a paper delivered at GATA’s Washington conference in April of 2008, titled, The Elephant In the Room.


Naked Short Sales [or Monetization] – More Flavors Than Ben and Jerry’s


In the mainstream financial press, of late, there has been much-ado about NAKED SHORT SALES of equities [stocks].  That these phantom stock trades do in fact occur cannot be refuted.  The Securities and Exchange Commission [SEC] has not only acknowledged that these fraudulent trades do occur, although illegal, but they have even gone so far as to announce that they will be vigilant – going forward – to ensure these illegal trades do not happen to selective financial stocks.


What this shows is that regulators – in this case the SEC – do, at least on occasions - turn a blind eye to illegal actions right under their noses and certainly within their jurisdictions.


What impressed Kirby about naked short sales of equities was how similar in appearance they were with the purchase and sales of bonds – particularly in the case of J.P. Morgan Chase – that, likewise, cannot legally exist.


In the case of “phantom” stocks, laymen cannot tell the difference between real ones or the fakes.  The only folks who do know the difference are the settlement agents – the DTCC [Depository Trust Clearing Corporation] – whose leadership is made up of the very firms [banks and investment firms] who perpetrate these crimes.  To date, neither the DTCC nor the SEC have shown any willingness to expose the firms who have participated in these activities – citing bogus reasons of not wanting to reveal trade secrets.  For all intent and purpose, the trade data is buried and will never see the light-of-day.


Folks would do well to remember the most predominant character trait of international bankers; namely, they’ve never paid allegiance to ANY nation and their conduct is best described as supra-national.  History proves this point:


During the Civil War (from 1861-1865), President Lincoln needed money to finance the War from the North. The Bankers were going to charge him 24% to 36% interest. Lincoln was horrified and went away greatly distressed, for he was a man of principle and would not think of plunging his beloved country into a debt that the country would find impossible to pay back.


Eventually President Lincoln was advised to get Congress to pass a law authorizing the printing of full legal tender Treasury notes to pay for the War effort. Lincoln recognized the great benefits of this issue. At one point he wrote:


"... (we) gave the people of this Republic the greatest blessing they have ever had - their own paper money to pay their own debts..."


The Treasury notes were printed with green ink on the back, so the people called them "Greenbacks".


Lincoln printed 400 million dollars worth of Greenbacks (the exact amount being $449,338,902), money that he delegated to be created, a debt-free and interest-free money to finance the War. It served as legal tender for all debts, public and private. He printed it, paid it to the soldiers, to the U.S. Civil Service employees, and bought supplies for war.

Shortly after that happened, "The London Times" printed the following:


"if that mischievous financial policy, which had its origin in the North American Republic, should become indurated down to a fixture, then that Government will furnish its own money without cost. It will pay off debts and be without a debt. It will have all the money necessary to carry on its commerce. It will become prosperous beyond precedent in th history of the civilized governments of the world. The brains and the wealth of all countries will go to North America. That government must be destroyed, or it will destroy every monarchy on the globe."


The Bankers obviously understood. The only thing, I repeat, the only thing that is a threat to their power is sovereign governments printing interest-free and debt-free paper money. They know it would break the power of the international Bankers.


After this was published in "The London Times", the British Government, which was controlled by the London and other European Bankers, moved to support the Confederate South, hoping to defeat Lincoln and the Union, and destroy this government which they said had to be destroyed.


They were stopped by two things.


First, Lincoln knew the British people, and he knew that Britain would not support slavery, so he issued the Emancipation Proclamation, which declared that slavery in the United States was abolished. At this point, the London Bankers could not openly support the Confederacy because the British people simply would not stand for their country supporting slavery.


Second, the Czar of Russia sent a portion of the Russian navy to the United States with orders that its admiral would operate under the command of Abraham Lincoln. [The Czarist regime would pay dearly for this transgression in the future.]  These ships of the Russian navy then became a threat to the ships of the British navy which had intended to break the blockade and help the South.


The North won the War, and the Union was preserved. America remained as one nation.

Of course, the Bankers were not going to give in that easy, for they were determined to put an end to Lincoln's interest-free, debt-free Greenbacks. He was assassinated by an agent of the Bankers shortly after the War ended.


Thereafter, Congress revoked the Greenback Law and enacted, in its place, the National Banking Act. The national banks were to be privately owned and the national bank notes they issued were to be interest-bearing. The Act also provided that the Greenbacks should be retired from circulation as soon as they came back to the Treasury in payment of taxes.


In 1972, the United States Treasury Department was asked to compute the amount of interest that would have been paid if that 400 million dollars would have been borrowed at interest instead of being issued by Abraham Lincoln. They did some computations, and a few weeks later, the United States Treasury Department said the United States Government saved 4 billion dollars in interest because Lincoln had created his own money. So you can about imagine how much the Government has paid and how much we owe solely on the basis of interest.


Selling something that does not exist [naked shorting], besides being fraudulent, is tantamount to printing money out of thin air.  Most problematic for the perpetrators, perhaps, are the paper trails generated by these larcenous transactions. 


With Kirby’s background having so much to do with bonds – trading and settlement – owing to the fact that he once helped set up an institutional bond-desk, Ms. Fitts’ little vignette [especially the time frame of 1997-2000 cited] really stuck in his craw.


With the events of 9/11 being forever etched in his mind – having lost so many good friends at bond broker, Cantor Fitzgerald, the world’s largest broker of U.S. Government Securities – floors 100-105 North Tower, WTC – he happens to remember intimate details of things like, the 658 Cantor employees that died that day and how quickly the firm re-commenced operations.  In case none of you remember, here’s a little refresher:


Cantor Fitzgerald Finds Permanent NYC HQ, Will Add 200 Jobs

by JACK LYNE, Site Selection Executive Editor of Interactive Publishing


NEW YORK Cantor Fitzgerald (, which suffered the most devastating corporate casualties on 9/11/01, has picked a permanent new headquarters home in New York City. 


….Perhaps the most critical steps in the company’s comeback came immediately after the attacks. Somewhat miraculously, Cantor and eSpeed managed to be back up and running when the New York bond market reopened at 8 on the morning of Sept. 13 — not yet 48 hours after 9/11’s attacks. 

       One key recovery element was the mirror site that Cantor had established at its data center in Rochelle Park, N.J. The New Jersey operation replicated all of the machines, connections and functionality inside the company’s WTC headquarters…..


…One of the biggest assists came from rival electronic trading company ICI/ADP ( While eSpeed’s IT staff was able to restore many trading system applications, it couldn’t resuscitate the system for settling transactions — which would’ve made reopening for business impossible.


Kirby wrote to Ms. Fitts after reading her Mortgage Market Musing piece,




Your little story posted at the café about a gang of scoundrels who sold bonds that might not have existed. If I was a betting man – I’d say and in fact have no doubt that those bonds were “monetized” through Cantor Fitzgerald in the time period 1997 – 2000. Trillions were undoubtedly involved.


Rob Kirby


Whether or not Trillions of dollars worth of bonds were really “monetized” through Cantor Fitzgerald form 1997 – 2000, perhaps no one will ever really know for sure.


However, this tidbit [or smoking gun, perhaps?] emphatically states that Trillions worth of bonds issued “disappeared into a black hole”,

            Discrepancies in America's accounts hide a black hole

`By Daniel Gros

Published: June 15 2006 03:00 | Last updated: June 15 2006 03:00

The global financial system seems to have a black hole at its centre. Over the last two decades, US residents have sold a total of about $5,500bn worth of IOUs to foreigners, yet the officially recorded net investment position of the US has deteriorated only by a little more than half of this amount ($2,800bn). The US capital market seems to have acted like a black hole for investors from the rest of world in which $2,700bn vanished from sight - or at least from the official statistics.

How can $2,700bn disappear?

It is often argued that the US can simply make large capital gains on its gross positions because its assets are denominated in foreign currency and its liabilities in dollars. However, the available data indicate that over the last two decades this factor has netted the US at most $300bn-$400bn. This still leaves a loss of well over $2,000bn to be explained…..

Ladies and gentlemen, the only way that I know that 2.7 Trillion worth of bonds can disappear like this – is if they were “monetized” - on the sly.


If such an event did occur, the Federal Reserve would categorically and necessarily have been aware that something was amiss - if not outright complicit in the act.  That, of course, would be saying something awfully nasty about the Federal Reserve [an institution that has no reserves and is no more ‘Federal’ than Federal Express] as well as the institution of “Central Banking” now – wouldn’t it?  As GATA secretary and treasurer, Chris Powell, recently wrote,

Is central banking inevitably deceitful, corrupt, and grafting?

Working with GATA, you eventually discover that you're working with not just the secret knowledge of the universe -- the power of gold -- but also and just as important the largely forgotten knowledge of the ages. A powerful reminder of this can be found in an essay written five years ago for the Mises Institute in Auburn, Alabama, by one of its adjunct scholars, H.A. Scott Trask, "The Fed's Predecessors in American History."

Trask's essay is a brief history of the Second Bank of the United States, which functioned from 1817 to 1836. Trask shows how this central bank quickly resorted to market manipulation, deceit, patronage, and corruption to maintain its power and subvert democracy. Some of the methods cited by Trask are identical to those being used now by the successors of the Second Bank of the United States, the Federal Reserve and the Treasury Department.

Trask quotes the economic historian William M. Gouge as attributing the failures of the Second Bank of the United States to the very concept of central banking. "The fault is in the system," Gouge wrote. "Give the management of it to the wisest and best men in the country, and still it will produce evil."

Each day's news out of Washington and New York makes it harder to argue with those who think so.

You can find Trask's essay at the Mises Internet site here: 

Whether or not those towers were really brought down to obscure a number of Trillions of dollars worth of illegal money creation would certainly lend credence to the 9/11 Truth Movement – who refuse to accept – as I do – the official explanation as to how and why those towers were brought down.


One can only speculate that if such a thing ever did occur – an OBSCENCE amount of money would have been created “out of thin air” which would have been more than enough to “blow a few asset bubbles with”.


Another thing, if such an event really ever did happen, the traceable records of the phony bond trades are all buried too.


All that would remain to give anyone a sniff would be unacknowledged or reported “untraceable fiat cash” – wreaking inflationary havoc on an economy somewhere.

“We shall have World Government, whether or not we like it. The only question is whether World Government will be achieved by conquest or consent.” – James Paul Warburg, whose family co-founded the Federal Reserve - while speaking before the United States Senate, February 17, 1950




Officialdom is still trying to silence the voice of Catherine Austin Fitts.  Just this week she was ‘censored’ from KPFA radio in the San Francisco Bay area where Fitts had been doing a 15 minute segment once a week called "Community Business" on Flashpoints, a show on KPFA which is a Pacifica affiliate. 


Fitts was offered this as an explanation, “that only academics and not for profits may be allowed on Flashpoints to cover economic issues. That means no investors, no business people including small business people or independent small investors”.


As a result, the show host, Dennis Bernstein, has requested that Project Censored investigate.


For more on Ms. Fitts' theory that covering up $4 trillion missing from the US Treasury was an essential part of the 9-11 operations, see:


9-11 Profiteering


Will the Real Economic Hit Men Please Stand Up?


The Most Profitable Economic Hit in History


Rob Kirby on Central Banking

-- Posted Tuesday, 5 August 2008 | Digg This Article | Source:


Increase Text SizeDecrease Text SizeE-mail Link of Current PagePrinter Friendly PageReturn to >> Story

E-mail Page  | Print  | Disclaimer 

© 1995 - 2019 Supports

©, Gold Seek LLC

The content on this site is protected by U.S. and international copyright laws and is the property of and/or the providers of the content under license. By "content" we mean any information, mode of expression, or other materials and services found on This includes editorials, news, our writings, graphics, and any and all other features found on the site. Please contact us for any further information.

Live GoldSeek Visitor Map | Disclaimer


The views contained here may not represent the views of, Gold Seek LLC, its affiliates or advertisers., Gold Seek LLC makes no representation, warranty or guarantee as to the accuracy or completeness of the information (including news, editorials, prices, statistics, analyses and the like) provided through its service. Any copying, reproduction and/or redistribution of any of the documents, data, content or materials contained on or within this website, without the express written consent of, Gold Seek LLC, is strictly prohibited. In no event shall, Gold Seek LLC or its affiliates be liable to any person for any decision made or action taken in reliance upon the information provided herein.