-- Posted Friday, 8 January 2010 | | Source: GoldSeek.com
By R. D. Bradshaw
As is my customary practice, this article is defined in the Goldsmiths’ series. If it had a title, it would have to be “We should not go down at the hands of the Rothschild Cabal by default.” The sub-title should be “Even when we will probably lose, we can at least go down fighting.”
“Www.analysis-news.com has had some email letters to the editor asking or suggesting different ways to oppose the Rothschild Cabal of bankers in their move to profits and world government. My position is that we probably lost the battle back in 1787 or 1860 and certainly by 1913 when we stupidly and irresponsibly turned the nation’s money over to the Rothschild Cabal gang of thieves. Like old man Rothschild stated some 250 years ago, let him control a nation’s money and he cared not who writes its laws.
Yes, it doesn’t matter whether the economy is based on capitalism, socialism, fascism, communism, a monarchy or whatever. When Rothschild gets the money, he takes over the nation. Amazingly, most people simply don’t understand that simple fact even though it is clearly obvious. Too, Rothschild also alleged in an ancient document of those days his precise plans to make profits and rule the world thru deception (this is detailed in Understanding Money and War XIV at www.analysis-news.com). So far, his words have proven to be incredibly true. They are so accurate that they explain why we lost the battle long ago. Yet, there still is at least one more option we can pursue—we can go down fighting even if we lose in the end.
A Revisit to Goldsmiths 98
The Goldsmiths (GS) 98 of Sep 3, 2009 addressed the Rothschild Cabal’s alleged theft of Washington Mutual along with the Cabal rip off and theft from gold and other investors over the past 65 years. Anyone wanting to read this story of a classic rip off of Americans can go back and read the Goldsmiths XCVIII (at www.goldseek.com or at my site at www.analysis-news.com). Without repeating that lengthy article, the fact remains that the US government--through the FDIC, OTS and the Federal Reserve--worked with JP Morgan-Chase in collusion to take over Washington Mutual in what some persons allege to be a theft and rip off.
JP Morgan Chase acquired the $307 billion in WM assets at a fire sale price of about $1.8 billion. The GS 98 article allowed for some legal action by the injured parties at Washington Mutual and indeed some or all of the thousands and/or millions of other investors ripped off, defrauded and swindled over the years by the Rothschild Cabal of bandits and crooks. Some of the legal options available in the US would be appropriate action involving the Sherman and Clayton Anti-trust acts, the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organization Act, 18 USC 1961-1964 (popularly called RICO), and the constitutional protection from deprivation of life, liberty and property without due process of law. I think it would be absolutely great to take the Rothschild Cabal of bandits on before an impartial and fair US jury.
Without going into the details, the WM take-over appears to have violated a whole host of laws as well as the US Constitution. In the deal, thousands of small investors in WM lost their life savings at the plotting and conniving of Rothschild Cabal relatives and agents. So far, there have been a few lawsuits but really nothing from these thousands of small investors who lost everything in one motion.
The backdrop is simple. It involved three primary Rothschild Cabal banking dynastic families. There was the old Chase Bank run by the Rockefeller/Roggenfelder family, the Manhattan Bank owned by the Warburgs and the Morgan interests run by the Rothschilds. Chase and the Manhattan Bank merged to produce Chase Manhattan. Some time later, these three banking interests combined to produce JP Morgan-Chase which took over both Bear Stearns and Washington Mutual thru the help of US regulators.
But there are relevant facts that almost no one will dare bring up or discuss for fear of being called names, intimidated and damaged by the Rothschild controlled media as well as by various government authorities. In the case at hand, demonstrating collusion and conspiracy at very high levels, it just happens that Sheila Bair at the FDIC, John E. Bowman at OTS and Ben Bernanke at the Fed are all racial/blood relatives and manifest agents of the Rockefellers/Roggenfelders, Rothschilds and Warburgs.
To add further evidence of collusion and conspiracy, there are reasons suggesting that Jamie Dimon belongs to the same crowd. Dimon is the President of JPMC and sits on the Board of Directors of the New York Federal Reserve Bank.
Well, the bottom line on this is that the thousands of investors and creditors with Washington Mutual were ripped off, defrauded and stolen from by an alleged conspiracy involving the Rothschild Cabal banking interests with JPMC and US regulators Bernanke, Bair and Bowman. I am at a loss on why the people injured and damaged haven’t so far taken on this gang of alleged crooks and con artists. Anyway, the take of the Goldsmiths 98 was that some legal actions could/should be initiated against this gang of alleged crooks and bandits.
The same theme was broached in the case of gold and other investors who have been ripped off, defrauded, cheated and screwed by the Rothschild Cabal banking interests over the years, as they have worked in collusion with the Fed and US officials with the US government to manipulate, juggle and control the financial markets. The gold markets in particular have had much manipulation.
Some Post September 3d Reactions
Since the Goldsmiths 98 was published, there have been a couple of developments which are noteworthy. In Nov 2009, the Gold Anti-Trust Action Agency (GATA) raised some money; and around Dec 30, 2009 launched a lawsuit against the Fed over its dishonesty and crooked operations of secretly intervening and manipulating the gold market over the years. GATA had an article by GATA official Chris Powell at www.goldseek.com on “GATA sues the Fed to Disclose Market Interventions” (case No 09-2436 ESH in USDC in the DC). I would hope that the Goldsmiths 98, published back on Sep 3, 2009, provided at least some motivation for this suit.
There is still one more lawsuit or pending lawsuit which could be revolutionary for investors and even the general public which has become entrapped in the credit card market. As some readers herein know, there are usury laws in the common law which limit interest rate charges. Most states define the legal interest rate levels. In Idaho, it is 12%. But by pleading interstate commerce, the big banks have avoided those laws.
The Federal government in general has looked the other way and allowed the banks to not only charge high interest rates but a vast assortment of fees and other charges which can pump credit card interest rates up to 79.9% (per an Associated Press story near Dec 20, 2009 by Candice Choi on “Credit Card’s Newest Trick: 79.9% Interest”).
To add fuel to the fire, the US government has a new law to take effect in Feb 2010 which will make some limitations on these ridiculously high bank charges. In anticipation of these few coming restrictions, the big Cabal banks have been notifying credit card holders in Dec 2009 that they must agree to and accept changes to their credit card contracts which will provide interest rates up to 30% and still more fees and charges (on this move, see WSJ article of Dec 30, 2009, by Rob Sidel, on “Banks Roll Out New Check Card Fees”). The banks threaten people that they must agree to account changes or their accounts will be closed.
Along with pushing these huge charges and fees on customers, the banks have also been actively reducing credit levels since mid 2008 when the Cabal began its intense effort to contract credit/money as is the Rothschild Cabal MO used to bring on depressions/recessions (this MO was defined by old man Rothschild some 250 years in a document discussed in the Goldsmiths 106-107, 109 and 120 and outlined in Understanding Money and War XIV at www.analysis-news.com).
Regularly, banks are notifying credit card customers of huge reductions in their available credit limits. Often, the banks cut levels down to $100 to $150 above a customer’s last balance. As the customer makes payment(s) to reduce the balance, the banks respond by further reducing the available balance even more to recognize the decrease in the balance after the payment(s).
Along with reducing available credit lines (to contract credit to intensify the depression, per the Rothschild MO), many banks have been sneaking in interest rate increases. I had a small credit card balance with a Rothschild Cabal bank (the owners were Rothschilds through a Rothschild daughter who intermarried with the bank’s owner). The balance I had was in accordance with a low interest rate offer on using some of the bank’s checks (supposed to be at a rate less than 9% after paying a 3% process fee). After I used the checks, the bank kept the interest rates at the agreed level for a few months; and then, silently and without notification to me, the bank raised the interest rate to 15% per annum.
Mind you, the interest rate and fee hikes and reductions in credit levels are occurring without regard to one’s credit status or even one’s experience with the particular bank involved. As you may know, the banks completely monitor almost every aspect of a person’s life thru the various credit agencies which maintain complete dossiers on people using social security numbers as identification numbers.
So here we have the Rothschild Cabal banks getting billions from the taxpayers, via the Fed and the Treasury, busy ripping off people right and left with no recourse left to the customers—either agree to their evil actions or they will cancel you out. The amazing thing is that besides the outright gifts and bailouts, the banks can get all the money they want from the Fed, usually at 0% to .25%. At a maximum, the bankers’ top rates are 2%. They loan this almost free money out to us, the suckers, and collect from 30% to 80%.
At Last, One California Lawyer Revolted
The above backdrop brings up a news story that came out on Jan 5, 2010 in a Huffington Post article by Arthur Delaney on “Ben Pavone, California Lawyer, Refuses to Pay Bank of America Credit Card, Threatens to Sue.” The essence of this report was that Pavone told Bank of America in a letter that he refuses to pay off his credit card debt of some $30,000 till they reduce the interest rate. He added that if the Bank tries to ruin his credit, he will sue them. He said: “They've got to have some kind of obligation to not totally extort the public.”
Per the story, the San Diego, CA attorney is angry about two things: his interest rate, which has gone up to 27.99 percent, and his credit limit, which has gone down to just above his balance. He added that he was “ ‘squeezed for cash’ and asked Bank of America to raise his credit limit in October. The bank responded with a two-page letter. The first page declined the request; the second told him his limit would be reduced from $32,100 to $30,400. Bank of America cited ‘economic trends’ in both decisions.”
Pavone wrote the bank back and said: “‘I consider your action an anticipatory repudiation of the contract and am treating you as in breach. I am therefore not paying the money that is currently due on January 3, 2010 out of protest.” He then added: “I have no doubt that you will mark my credit in light of this default, but if you do, I will sue you. I am eager to argue to a court that your interest rates are unfair within the meaning of various state and federal statutes, and anxious to point out that you 'had' to cut my credit limit from $32,000 down to $30,000 at the same time you were borrowing billions from the federal government and paid your executive bonuses in full.’”
Pavone's letter concluded by asking the bank to reduce his rate to 10.99 percent, after noting that it would probably cost less to reduce the rate than to have to fight the suit. Bank of America would not comment on the report but did say: “In general, we monitor accounts for risk and may adjust customers' lines up or down as appropriate based on the risk profile and performance with us.”
Ed Mierzwinski, program director for consumer advocacy group U.S. Public Interest Research Group, told Huff Post that Pavone had the right idea – “it would be easier for the bank to cut a deal with Pavone than to deal with him in court, which is a distinct possibility since the bank abandoned mandatory arbitration in the fall.” As Mierzwinski wrote: “The banks respond to the squeaky wheel,… Any consumer who complains has a better chance than those who do not.”
Ira Rheingold, director of the National Association of Consumer Advocates, was quoted as saying: “Banks have done really well figuring out ways to screw people without making themselves legally liable… I think [the limit reduction] is another example of Bank of America's venality. Whether or not it's a successful lawsuit, I don't know. Whether I think it ought to be challenged -- absolutely.”
As for as the legal theory of Pavone's possible lawsuit, consumer law experts say he just might have a case. Pavone said a possible suit would allege “unconscionability.”
The Bottom Line
If more people would react like GATA and Pavone, maybe the Rothschild Cabal and its agents and relatives with the privately owned Federal Reserve Bank and the US Government would be more careful about screwing, cheating and defrauding people without due process of law as guaranteed in the US Constitution.
____________________________________________________________________
Back issues of the Goldsmiths, by the editor of the Analysis of News, can be accessed from a Google or Yahoo search engine by typing in “R. D. Bradshaw” Goldsmiths. Several hundred web sites can be found with the back issues and with translations to Spanish, Italian, German, Dutch, Polish, Chinese and other foreign languages. Finally, the “Archives-Goldsmiths” of this website (www.analysis-news.com ) has all of the Goldsmith articles issued to date.
Besides the revelations contained in the Goldsmiths’ articles, the work of the plutocratic financial market manipulators to conspiratorially manipulate and control the financial markets (to make more profits and install a world government under their management) is also addressed at length in the periodic analysis of the news and in other articles produced at www.analysis-news.com. This website has an article of interest to any person interested in understanding the market Manipulators. It is the Hidden Secret of the Manipulators, why they succeed and how to follow their manipulations.
Readers of the above articles are invited to visit www.analysis-news.com and become a subscriber to regularly read some of the material from the world of information which will further reveal how extensive the manipulation, control and dishonesty realities are in the financial, currency and commodity markets, not only in the US but indeed around the world.
To go to the Home Page of this web site, click here: www.analysis-news.com.
-- Posted Friday, 8 January 2010 | Digg This Article
| Source: GoldSeek.com
