LIVE Gold Prices $  | E-Mail Subscriptions | Update GoldSeek | GoldSeek Radio 

Commentary : Gold Review : Markets : News Wire : Quotes : Silver : Stocks - Main Page 

 GoldSeek.com >> News >> Story  Disclaimer 
 
Latest Headlines

GoldSeek.com to Launch New Website
By: GoldSeek.com

Is Gold Price Action Warning Of Imminent Monetary Collapse Part 2?
By: Hubert Moolman

Gold and Silver Are Just Getting Started
By: Frank Holmes, US Funds

Silver Makes High Wave Candle at Target – Here’s What to Expect…
By: Clive Maund

Gold Blows Through Upside Resistance - The Chase Is On
By: Avi Gilburt

U.S. Mint To Reduce Gold & Silver Eagle Production Over The Next 12-18 Months
By: Steve St. Angelo, SRSrocco Report

Gold's sharp rise throws Financial Times into an erroneous sulk
By: Chris Powell, GATA

Precious Metals Update Video: Gold's unusual strength
By: Ira Epstein

Asian Metals Market Update: July-29-2020
By: Chintan Karnani, Insignia Consultants

Gold's rise is a 'mystery' because journalism always fails to pursue it
By: Chris Powell, GATA

 
Search

GoldSeek Web

 
The Goldsmiths—Part CLIII



-- Posted Friday, 6 August 2010 | | Source: GoldSeek.com

By R. D. Bradshaw

 

US President Franklin Rosenfeldt/Roosevelt shared with us one of the most profound revelations of all from a US president when he said that if it happens in politics, it was planned that way.  Few people have grasped how extraordinary and revealing FDR was in sharing his wisdom with us.  And that revelation brings up in this Goldsmiths the backdrop on the present global monetary system and what might lie ahead.  Exactly how right the deceitful, clever and cunning FDR was has been proven in history from the events associated with the Atlantic Charter, drafted in a meeting Rosenfeldt had with Winston Churchill on a ship in August 1941. 

 

WWII was planned and laid on by the Rothschild banking Cabal as early as 1933, if not earlier.  This fantastic revelation was established in the Goldsmiths Part LXXXVI with a report on a story in the Jul 5, 1999 US News & World Report on the Warrior Class which revealed the supposed FDR foresight of seeing the coming of WWII in 1933-1934 when he almost doubled the classes at West Point and Annapolis in obvious preparation for WWII by him and his cousins Adolf Jacob Schicklgruber, Winston Churchill and Joseph Stalin and the Rothschild and Warburg banking giants then in control of the US, Germany, France and Britain. 

 

By 1941 and the Atlantic Charter meeting with Churchill, Rosenfeldt was ready to once more prove that events going on at the highest levels are planned in advance.  Per Wikipedia, FDR’s meeting set forth his “ambitious goals for the postwar world” even before the US entered the war and the fate of the war was settled.  Yet, Rosenfeldt knew in advance what would happen and met with Churchill to discuss the post war future.  Anyway, per Wikipedia, the FDR and Churchill Atlantic Charter in Aug 1941 affirmed the right of all nations to have equal access to trade and raw materials (this was exactly opposite to what the Cabal and its US and British puppets allowed Germany in the 1930s); freedom of the seas; disarmament of aggressors; and the establishment of a wider and permanent system of general security.

 

Bretton Woods

 

By July 1944, the world powerful Rothschilds and their international banking cousins were ready to implement the Atlantic Charter agreed upon by FDR and Churchill in 1941.  This came about when 730 leaders/representatives of 44 nations gathered in a small town in New Hampshire called Bretton Woods to plan the future of the world which would allow the Rothschild banking Cabal to emerge as the real winner of WWII which was then still in progress in Europe and in the Pacific. 

 

As Wikipedia has it, Bretton Woods was the culmination of some two and a half years of planning (from 1941-42 to 1944) by the US and UK representatives on what had supposedly been lacking between WWI and WWII (which produced the Great Depression of the 1930s).  As the Rothschild written history has recorded it, the thing needed was a system of international payments that would allow trade to be conducted without fear of sudden currency depreciation or wild fluctuations in exchange rates (things which had brought on the Great Depression and things which are still going on today). 

 

In its article on the Bretton Woods system, Wikipedia says:  “The Bretton Woods system is commonly understood to refer to the international monetary regime that prevailed from the end of World War II until the early 1970s.”  It was supposedly history's first example of a “fully negotiated monetary order intended to govern currency relations among sovereign states.  In principle, the regime was designed to combine binding legal obligations with multilateral decision-making conducted through an international organization, the IMF, endowed with limited supranational authority.  In practice the initial scheme, as well as its subsequent development and ultimate demise, were directly dependent on the preferences and policies of its most powerful member, the United States.” 

 

To set up the Bretton Woods system, the 44 nations agreed to establish the International Monetary Fund (IMF); the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development (IBRD), which today is part of the World Bank Group; and the International Trade Organization (ITO).  Wikipedia defines the four major points defined in the system:  

 

  1. The pegged rate currency regime, a compromise between freely floating and irrevocably fixed exchange rates.
  2. A system for ensuring an adequate supply of monetary reserves.
  3. A ban on most discriminatory currency practices or exchange regulation, to avoid the kind of economic warfare that had characterized the 1930s.
  4. A forum for international cooperation on monetary matters.

Although not discussed in the several Wikipedia articles addressing this conference, it was clear that the US bosses at Bretton Woods pushed a system on the assembling nations that was planned and designed by the Rothschild Cabal snakes then ruling the various nations fighting it out on the WWII battlefields.  This system was designed to make the Cabal bankers the effective owners/controllers of the world’s monetary and economic activities. 

 

Bretton Woods the Breakdown

 

In an Internet article on Bretton Woods: Birth and Breakdown, John Braithwaite and Peter Drahos, in their book on Global Business Regulation, said:

 

“During the 1930s states had experienced a series of connected problems: shortage of gold, exchange rate instabilities, the movement of ‘hot’ money in and out of their realms, and the lack of a mechanism to adjust balance of payments problems.  The IMF was designed to deal with these difficulties by putting in place an international monetary system that contained a stable exchange rates regime with some scope for revaluation (‘pegged but adjustable’), provided for the convertibility of currency, provided a mechanism for overcoming short-term liquidity crises and an organizational actor for managing the system (J. Williamson, The Failure of World Monetary Reform, New York, 1977, pp. 2-28).

 

“The World Bank was designed to help the economic and industrial reconstruction of Europe and to help developing countries achieve industrialization. The purpose of the ITO was to propel states down the path of free trade, to stop them from defecting to protectionism as a way of responding to balance of payments problems (e.g. by imposing import quotas as an alternative to devaluing their currency).  The ITO never emerged, because of US concerns.  Instead, a weaker agreement known as the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade took its place…”

 

Effectively, Bretton Woods offered a plan for a global regulatory system for trade and finance.  Yet, almost all economists and historians are in agreement that by August 15, 1971, the Bretton Woods system had broken down—primarily because of Richard Nixon’s abandonment of exchanging US gold for US dollars which had been a provisional key component of Bretton Woods. 

 

How the Dollar Became the World’s Reserve Currency

 

A Dec 19, 2008 article in Market Skeptics on How the Dollar Became the World’s Reserve Currency by Eric deCarbonnel, quoting Wikipedia, says:  The chief features of the Bretton Woods system were an obligation for each country to adopt a monetary policy that maintained the exchange rate of its currency within a fixed value-plus or minus one percent-in terms of gold and the ability of the IMF to bridge temporary imbalances of payments.  In the face of increasing strain, the system collapsed in 1971, following the United States' suspension of convertibility from dollars to gold. This created the unique situation whereby the United States dollar became the ‘reserve currency’ for the states which had signed the agreement.”

 

Despite what some would say are bad features of the present system, it is clear that the Rothschild Cabal of bankers and their main puppet country, the US, has benefited handsomely by the present situation.  The dollar enjoys a reserve currency status which means many countries in the world conduct international trade in dollars and hold dollars in their monetary reserves.  But with recent dollar weakness, the EURO has enjoyed some status as a desired reserve currency.

 

Eric deCarbonnel adds:  The experience of the Great Depression was fresh on the minds of public officials.  The planners at Bretton Woods hoped to avoid a repeat of the debacle of the 1930s, when weakly regulated financial institutions led to a world-wide economic depression.  The ‘beggar thy neighbor’ policies of 1930s governments-using currency devaluations to increase the competitiveness of a country's export products in order to reduce balance of payments deficits-worsened national deflationary spirals, which resulted in plummeting national incomes, shrinking demand, mass unemployment, and an overall decline in world trade.  Trade in the 1930s became largely restricted to currency blocs (groups of nations that use an equivalent currency, such as the ‘Sterling Area’ of the British Empire).  These blocs retarded the international flow of capital and foreign investment opportunities.  Although this strategy tended to increase government revenues in the short run, it dramatically worsened the situation in the medium and longer run.” 

 

Eric deCarbonnel also notes that “The pillar of the U.S. vision of the postwar world was free trade.  Free trade involved lowering tariffs and among other things a balance of trade favorable to the capitalist system.  Thus, the more developed market economies agreed with the U.S. vision of postwar international economic management, which was to be designed to create and maintain an effective international monetary system and foster the reduction of barriers to trade and capital flows.  Throughout the war, the United States envisaged a postwar economic order in which the U.S. could penetrate markets that had been previously closed to other currency trading blocs, as well as to expand opportunities for foreign investments for U.S. corporations by removing restrictions on the international flow of capital.” 

 

As Eric deCarbonnel describes Bretton Woods “What emerged was the ‘pegged rate’ currency regime.  Members were required to establish a parity of their national currencies in terms of gold (a ‘peg’) and to maintain exchange rates within plus or minus 1% of parity (a ‘band’) by intervening in their foreign exchange markets (that is, buying or selling foreign money).

 

“In practice, however, since the principal ‘Reserve currency’ would be the U.S. dollar, this meant that other countries would peg their currencies to the U.S. dollar, and—once convertibility was restored—would buy and sell U.S. dollars to keep market exchange rates within plus or minus 1% of parity.  Thus, the U.S. dollar took over the role that gold had played under the gold standard in the international financial system.

 

Meanwhile, in order to bolster faith in the dollar, the U.S. agreed separately to link the dollar to gold at the rate of $35 per ounce of gold.  At this rate, foreign governments and central banks were able to exchange dollars for gold.  Bretton Woods established a system of payments based on the dollar, in which all currencies were defined in relation to the dollar, itself convertible into gold, and above all, ‘as good as gold’. The U.S. currency was now effectively the world currency, the standard to which every other currency was pegged.  As the world's key currency, most international transactions were denominated in dollars. 

 

The U.S. dollar was the currency with the most purchasing power and it was the only currency that was backed by gold.  Additionally, all European nations that had been involved in World War II were highly in debt and transferred large amounts of gold into the United States, a fact that contributed to the supremacy of the United States.  Thus, the U.S. dollar was strongly appreciated in the rest of the world and therefore became the key currency of the Bretton Woods system.  Member countries could only change their par value with IMF approval, which was contingent on IMF determination that its balance of payments was in a ‘fundamental disequilibrium.’”

 

The Nixon abandonment of gold convertibility with the dollar essentially ended the formal peg of foreign currencies to the dollar.  But the aftermath did not end the dollar’s power.  So, whereas in the 19th and early 20th centuries, gold was the world’s standard and valuation guide in international monetary transactions, Bretton Woods and its aftermath saw the US dollar emerge as the world’s standard of value.  Since the Rothschild Cabal of bankers had completely taken over the US government and economic and monetary systems with WWII, the reserve status of the dollar fit perfectly into the hands of the Cabal gang of bankers; mainly in London, but also in Europe and North America. 

 

Bretton Woods, the Aftermath

 

Over the next several years, after Bretton Woods I, a forum developed within the IMF by the 20 major nations that had control over executive positions at the IMF.  This forum, the Committee of the Board of Governors of the International Monetary System or the C-20, formulated a position to deal with the situation facing the Bretton Woods agreement after 1971 which was “to learn to live with the non-system that had evolved out of a mixture of custom and crisis over the preceding years” (per writers John Braithwaite and Peter Drahos).

 

Though many observers accepted the fact that Bretton Woods was dead, some held to the belief that the succeeding years had effectively put together a Bretton Woods II whereby the major nations agreed to live with the non-system.  Regardless, this writer would just add that the secret, behind-the-scenes maneuvering by the Rothschild Cabal owned/controlled central banks, plus the development of the European Union (EU) and the ECU and later the Euro, held the system together until our time.  The European monetary system adopted the following to add some stability to the problem:

 

  1. Prevent movements above 2.25 % around parity in bilateral exchange rates with other member countries.
  2. The European Monetary Cooperation Fund allocates ECUs to members' central banks in exchange for gold and dollar deposits. 20% of the quota must be paid in gold. ECU was an artificial currency and used in all intrasystem balance of payments settlements.  ECU was replaced by euro (at 1:1) on January 1, 1999.
  3. Provision of credit facilities for compensatory financing.

Over the ensuring years, a mixed process developed in that some countries continued to peg their currencies to the dollar or some other strong currency or basket of currencies while others allowed their currencies to float.  Per an Internet presentation by Joseph Daniels and David Van Hoose, there is now a mixed bag among nations on how they handle their currencies with some 111 countries adopting fixed exchange rates by 2007.  Some 41 have no separate legal tender, seven have currency boards, 52 have fixed pegs, six horizontal bands, five crawling pegs and 76 with floating.

 

In an article on Bretton Woods II, writers Dooley, Folkerts-Landau and Garber have referred to the monetary system of today as Bretton Woods II.  They argue that today, like 40 years ago, the international system is composed of a core issuing the dominant international currency, and a periphery.  The periphery is committed to export-led growth based on the maintenance of an undervalued exchange rate.  In the 1960s, the core was the United States and the periphery was Europe and Japan.  This old periphery has since 'graduated', and the new periphery is Asia.  The core remains the same, the United States.  The argument is that a system of pegged currencies, in which the periphery export capital to the core that provides a financial intermediary role is both stable and desirable, although this notion is controversial (per Wikipedia). 

 

But today, here in 2010, the idea of Bretton Woods II is losing steam and support—primarily because of the Rothschild Cabal imposed deflation and depression starting at least in 2007, if not earlier, and intensifying in Sep 2008 when the Cabal brought on a hard fall on commodities and foreign currencies to boost the dollar and US debt around the world.  This need to boost the dollar and US debt was precipitated by the vast squandering of US Federal Reserve Notes around the world in wars, political intrigues, uprisings, etc in order to further the Rothschild Cabal plans for profits and world government (on this, see Understanding Money and War XIV at www.analysis-news.com).

 

Now, A New Bretton Woods is Being Called For

 

Consequently, the meaning of a supposed "Bretton Woods II" monetary system has been somewhat superseded and outdated by the events of 2007 to date and the imposition of a growing Rothschild imposed depression.  Many government leaders, private bankers, policymakers and others are now joining a call for a new international monetary system that might be called Bretton Woods II or III depending on how one can define the system since 1971.  Wikipedia describes this current move for a new international agreement on currencies by noting the following three calls:

 

On September 26, 2008, French president, Nicolas Sarkozy, said, "we must rethink the financial system from scratch, as at Bretton Woods.”  Sarkozy is a former Mossad agent and close cousin of the ruling Rothschild Cabal of bankers.  His call for a new agreement certainly echoes the feelings of his cousin bankers. 

 

On September 24–25, 2009, US President Obama hosted the G20 in Pittsburgh at the David L. Lawrence Convention Center.  A realignment of currency exchange rates was proposed.  This meeting's policy outcome could be known as the Pittsburgh Agreement of 2009, where deficit nations may devalue their currencies and surplus nations may revalue theirs upward. 

 

In March 2010, Prime Minister Papandreou of Greece wrote an op-ed in the International Herald Tribune, in which he said: "Democratic governments worldwide must establish a new global financial architecture, as bold in its own way as Bretton Woods, as bold as the creation of the European Community and European Monetary Union.  And we need it fast."  In interviews coinciding with his meeting with President Obama, he indicated that Obama would raise the issue of new regulations for the international financial markets at the next G20 meetings in June and November 2010.

 

Since as early as 2007, US Socialist leader Lyndon LaRouche and his wife have been pushing for a new Ad Hoc Committee for a new Bretton Woods meeting and agreement.  In her 2007 call, Mrs LaRouche said:  “The systemic crash of the world financial system is in full swing. Shaken loose but not caused by the collapse of the subprime mortgage market in the U.S. and the end of the inflationary yen carry trade in Japan, the house of cards of ‘creative financial instruments,’ as Alan Greenspan has dubbed various credit derivatives, has thereby caved in. Because the takeover craze on the part of the hedge funds and private equity funds has been rising higher and higher over the recent years and months with ever wilder predatory raids, the investment banks which have financed the majority of these takeovers, are now left sitting on these worthless credits. More U.S. mortgage financiers will declare insolvency, more banks will go under in the vortex of the credit crisis. In the U.S. there are currently almost $10 trillion in mortgage loans, over a third of which are bad credit risks. In Germany the examples of the IKB bank and the Westdeutsche LandesBank have shown that boards of directors are finding it hard to admit the quantity of their losses. 

 

“The myth that the central banks have an endless number of possibilities to always bring a crash under control, is exploding: They now find themselves between the Scylla of the fight against inflation with higher interest rates—which is urgent in the face of the obvious inflation of food, raw materials, and oil, but would lead to bubbles like that of the U.S. mortgage market, and the like, bursting even more—and the Charybdis of the credit crisis, which has been unleashed by the reversed-leverage collapse. If the central banks try to stop a chain reaction by infusing liquidity in the range of hundreds of billions of dollars, as just occurred within 24 hours during the second week of August, this only means that there will be a hyperinflation like that in Weimar Germany 1923—only this time not in one country, but worldwide.  It is a dilemma from which there is no way out: The system is finished.”

 

Both Mr and Mrs LaRouche are calling for an emergency conference for a New Bretton Woods which should address the following:

 

1. The current world financial system must be declared hopelessly bankrupt and be replaced by a new one.

2. A system of fixed exchange rates must be agreed upon immediately.

3. Derivatives speculation must be prohibited through an agreement among governments.

4. There must be put into effect a comprehensive reorganization, or, as the case may be, a cancellation of debts.

5. There must be put in place new credit lines, through state credit creation, in the tradition of Alexander Hamilton and the American System, which will make possible productive full employment, through investments in basic infrastructure and technological revival.

6. The completion of the Eurasian Land-Bridge, as the kernel of the reconstruction of the world economy, is thus the vision which will not only bring about an economic miracle, but also can become a system of peace for the 21st Century.

7. A new “Treaty of Westphalia” must guarantee the opening up and development of raw materials for all nations on this Earth, for at least the next 50 years.

 

The LaRouches say that the present system of “globalization,” with its brutal vulture capitalism, has economically, financially, and morally failed.  In its place, man must again be put in the center, and the economy must serve the general welfare first and foremost. 

 

A Call for Gold

 

Along with all the calls for a new Bretton Woods, usually in the vein of fiat, paper currencies, there have been some witnesses who have a different approach.  Here, we can cite an article by Walker Todd in the Nov 15, 2008 Christian Science Monitor on Bretton Woods II – we need a gold standard--Without the integrity and restraint a gold standard provides, America may be headed on a path to hyperinflation.

 

As Todd perceives the present dilemma, he places the blame with too much credit and too much easy money.  He perceives these two items as the biggest culprits behind this financial crisis.  He then adds that “the government's rescue attempt is built on more credit and even easier money. That's like giving a procrastinator a deadline extension. By choosing this course, Washington has steered us on to the ‘road to Weimar’ – the road to runaway inflation.”  Todd says that the needed remedy is to bring back the gold standard.  He indicates that this solution would provide stability and safety for nations and individuals around the world. 

 

He blames much of the present situation on the Federal Reserve Bank where he notes the doubling of Federal Reserve credit, the main component of the US monetary base, since Labor Day 2008 (it went up from $894 billion to $2.2 trillion).  He says that the Fed has “nearly abandoned its traditional instrument for monetary policy, open-market operations, which involves the purchasing and selling of full-faith-and-credit US Treasury securities.  With increasing frequency and amounts, it has relied primarily on ‘discount window operations’ – lending to specific institutions for specific purposes instead of general injections of funds into an open market – since August 2007.  This shift may weaken its ability to ‘tighten’ monetary conditions should inflation reach dangerous levels.”

 

Todd’s conclusion is that the return to the gold standard is needed to impose the discipline which is not coming from the Fed.  He adds that gold provides integrity to the entire global financial system.  He notes that with gold it's harder for governments to inflate the money supply, which they're tempted to do in order to spend beyond their means or cheat on their debts.  He correctly notes that after Nixon abandoned the convertibility of the dollar to gold in 1971, the value of the dollar and inflation has fluctuated wildly ever since. 

 

My Take

 

Frankly, I wish it was possible for the views of Walker Todd to prevail in international monetary matters.  But I am sorry to say that this is not going to happen.  The Rothschild Cabal of master serpents are in total control in the US, Britain and the White British Commonwealth and with almost total control in Europe and indeed in numerous other countries around the world.  They are accomplishing their objectives for profits and moving to world government under the present fiat, paper money system.  I see no way that they will totally abandon this present system, per se.

 

For example, the US government and national leaders have had much Rothschild media hype about the recent law passed to provide for supposed reform/corrections of the many problems of the US monetary and financial systems—including the strong push by Congressman Ron Paul for an independent and extensive audit of the privately owned Federal Reserve.  I wrote to subscribers at www.analysis-news.com long ago that nothing meaningful would result from all the hype that the nation’s leaders and the Rothschild media were feeding the dumb sheep.  As I repeatedly said, there was no way that there would be an audit of substance on the secret operations of the Fed. 

 

I have consistently predicted a lot of smoke and mirrors over nothing meaningful and/or nothing of an advantage to the nation.  I correctly had it that more power would devolve to the Fed and Washington (meaning the Rothschild master snakes would come out the winners).  This is precisely what the new law does.  It ignores the big Rothschild Cabal banks and their trillions of dollars in derivatives all the while that there are more government regulations and controls on individuals in America.  And this MO of doing nothing but putting out a lot of smoke and mirrors seems on the docket for any upcoming Bretton Woods II or III, whichever. 

 

My take is that the deteriorating global situation and the calls by non-Rothschild Cabal controlled nations (like in South America, the Middle East, Asia and Russia) will force a new international meeting and agreement on currencies and international finance.  To touch it off, I would suggest that the Cabal snakes may initiate another hard fall like they did in Sep 2008.  This could come this fall or next year, depending on what happens with their planned attack on Iran or some natural disaster or alleged terrorist attack in the US. 

 

Regardless of what the catalyst will be that kicks this thing off, there will be some worldwide calls for a new Bretton Woods conference-- primarily by non-Rothschild controlled nations and peoples; but also as well in Rothschild controlled puppet states, among Rothschild managed politicians, and by the Rothschild owned/controlled media.  Of course, the Rothschild Cabal will lay this thing on and run it just like they did at Bretton Woods I.  They were in charge and will be in charge in any future meeting and event. 

 

I note that at Bretton Woods I the English pound came out smelling like a rose, though it stunk like a sewer.  The pound was pegged to over four US dollars.  Since 1944, the pound has been going down in the markets.  Even now, it is a sick currency but receives some boosting because the US dollar is even sicker. 

 

My take is that this coming conference will someway manipulate the dollar to come out of it in a strong position.  There is a possibility that before such a conference takes place that we will have a new North American currency—along the lines of the predicted Amero.  With the gold strength of Canada and the “alleged” huge gold holdings in the US, perhaps some possible limited gold backing can be attached to a new North American currency.  Hence, there is a possibility that the dollar, thru the value of an Amero, can come out of a new Bretton Woods with some strength and respectability. 

 

Thus, there are reasons to believe that a new Bretton Woods will take place.  My position is that at such a conference there could be a new arrangement on a reserve currency.  I can see a basket of currencies to be the new reserve currency.  This could and will likely include the Euro, a new Amero or something similar, the Chinese Yuan, the Russian Ruble, the Middle East Gulfo and maybe even some others.  If the Amero went into such a meeting with a limited partial gold backing, it would help make it very attractive. 

 

We probably cannot rule out gold completely at the international level, but it seems doubtful.  Instead, the IMF cornered Special Drawing Rights (SDR) have a very bright future and will be in any basket of reserve currencies.  But such a conference will not settle the future of international money and finance.  I think we are being set up by the Rothschild Cabal of bandits/thieves to have WWIII which will at last bring on world government.

 

____________________________________________________________________

 

Back issues of the Goldsmiths, by the editor of the Analysis of News, can be accessed from a Google or Yahoo search engine by typing in “R. D. Bradshaw” Goldsmiths.  Several hundred web sites can be found with the back issues and with translations to Spanish, Italian, German, Dutch, Polish, Chinese, Japanese, Indonesian, Serbian, and other foreign languages.  Finally, the “Archives-Goldsmiths” of this website (www.analysis-news.com ) has all of the Goldsmith articles issued to date. 

 

Besides the revelations contained in the Goldsmiths’ articles, the work of the plutocratic financial market manipulators to conspiratorially manipulate and control the financial markets (to make more profits and install a world government under their management) is also addressed at length in the periodic analysis of the news and in other articles produced at www.analysis-news.com.  This website has an article of interest to any person interested in understanding the market Manipulators.  It is the Hidden Secret of the Manipulators, why they succeed and how to follow their manipulations. 

 

Readers of the above articles are invited to visit www.analysis-news.com and become a subscriber to regularly read some of the material from the world of information which will further reveal how extensive the manipulation, control and dishonesty realities are in the financial, currency and commodity markets, not only in the US but indeed around the world. 

 

To return to the Home Page of this web site, click here:  www.analysis-news.com.


-- Posted Friday, 6 August 2010 | Digg This Article | Source: GoldSeek.com




 



Increase Text SizeDecrease Text SizeE-mail Link of Current PagePrinter Friendly PageReturn to GoldSeek.com

 news.goldseek.com >> Story

E-mail Page  | Print  | Disclaimer 


© 1995 - 2019



GoldSeek.com Supports Kiva.org

© GoldSeek.com, Gold Seek LLC

The content on this site is protected by U.S. and international copyright laws and is the property of GoldSeek.com and/or the providers of the content under license. By "content" we mean any information, mode of expression, or other materials and services found on GoldSeek.com. This includes editorials, news, our writings, graphics, and any and all other features found on the site. Please contact us for any further information.

Live GoldSeek Visitor Map | Disclaimer


Map

The views contained here may not represent the views of GoldSeek.com, Gold Seek LLC, its affiliates or advertisers. GoldSeek.com, Gold Seek LLC makes no representation, warranty or guarantee as to the accuracy or completeness of the information (including news, editorials, prices, statistics, analyses and the like) provided through its service. Any copying, reproduction and/or redistribution of any of the documents, data, content or materials contained on or within this website, without the express written consent of GoldSeek.com, Gold Seek LLC, is strictly prohibited. In no event shall GoldSeek.com, Gold Seek LLC or its affiliates be liable to any person for any decision made or action taken in reliance upon the information provided herein.