-- Posted Thursday, 16 December 2010 | | Source: GoldSeek.com
A BIG GOLD interview with John Hathaway, Tocqueville Gold Fund
When John Hathaway spoke at the Casey’s Gold and Resource Summit in October, many of the audience came away feeling like they were listening to Doug Casey, with his contrarian views, bold statements, and laying much of the blame for our current problems at the feet of government. Read what John, a seasoned investment pro and manager of the famously successful $1.4 billion Tocqueville Gold Fund, has to say about gold, precious metals stocks, and the future of the U.S. dollar.
Jeff Clark: John, give us your big-picture perspective on why you're investing in gold.
John Hathaway: We launched the Tocqueville Gold Fund (TGLDX) in 1998 when it was a very contrarian idea. I always like to say it was the "Rodney Dangerfield" of investments at the time because a lot of people laughed at us and we didn’t get much respect. It was essentially a very contrarian investment theme, and we did it at a time when the markets were going nuts for dot-com stocks, which we thought was absolute lunacy.
Our thesis is basically related to the lack of faith that institutions, investors, and citizens have in paper money. That shift in opinion has come in fits and starts but is the core reason gold has risen to the extent it has. And until you have a significant restoration in terms of confidence in paper money, gold should do very well.
Jeff: Some are calling gold a bubble.
John: Many people – I'd say most people – are not on board. So to me it's not a bubble. Maybe it's on its way to being a bubble, but a bubble has to be pervasive and ubiquitous and in every fiber of every investment institution and every investor portfolio, as was dot-com and housing, and we simply have not reached that stage. The best line I've heard is, "A lot of people have had a first date with gold, but they still haven’t gotten to first base."
Jeff: [Laughs] That's good.
John: The fact is, people talk about it because it's newsworthy. The price is rising and making news, but so what? That doesn't make it a bubble. My thesis is that everyone should make a strategic allocation to gold because it's the counterweight to paper money that continues to lose credibility as a store of value.
Jeff: So the U.S. dollar is going a lot lower, in your view?
John: Yes. You're beginning to see a lot of bilateral trade deals between China and Latin American countries that have to be settled in renminbi. You're seeing similar moves on the part of other trading partners completely bypassing the dollar in international trade. You're seeing growing currency controls, particularly for capital flows – Brazil and Thailand are two countries that come to mind. At this point it's not chaotic, but these are precursors to what could become chaotic. It seems orderly right now, but it could become more accelerated.
I'm also very skeptical that QE2 is going to do any good. And if the economy is still stagnant a year from now, there's going to be QE3, QE4, and QE5. I just don’t see how anyone can not have some gold in this environment.
Jeff: We think inflation ultimately wins the battle over deflation. Do you agree?
John: For the most part, yes, but I don’t think you have to know which we'll get to decide if you should buy gold. If we have a deflationary morass, where we're stuck in a liquidity trap for the next five years, it will make the government do all kinds of crazy things that will undermine the value of money, which will ultimately turn out to be inflationary. This debate between deflation and inflation is always interesting, but I don’t think it matters if you're invested in gold. I think in either outcome, gold wins.
Jeff: Are you as bullish on silver?
John: When you're talking about monetary issues, silver will certainly benefit, particularly in an inflationary sequence. On the other hand, if we have a deflationary sell-off like we had in 2008, silver is going to underperform. So with silver I think you have to be more certain about the outcome. Silver is more dependent on inflation to do well. That's because silver has industrial uses, which would disappear or be greatly undercut in a deflation.
Jeff: What about the other precious metals, platinum and palladium?
John: Frankly, they’re not a big part of the portfolio right now. But we would consider them if we found good investment vehicles.
Jeff: Speaking of sell-offs, what odds do you put on us having another one like in 2008?
John: The potential is there. I don’t know where it would come from, but one possibility would be another sovereign debt issue in Europe. Another possibility is if the bond market had a serious setback and triggered a run to liquidity, although there aren’t that many places to go anymore. Turmoil in the currency markets is certainly a concern to policymakers. All of those things could bring about another worldwide margin call like we had in 2008.
Jeff: So should we avoid gold stocks right now due to the risks?
John: It depends on your risk profile. If you're conservative and don’t want to lose any sleep, I think you hold physical gold as a hedge against the rest of your portfolio. But if you're more of a risk-taker and see the macro-landscape as an opportunity, even though it's a negative view, you definitely want to have exposure to gold stocks. And if they’re good companies, they should outperform the gold price because they’re generating a lot of earnings and cash flow at these prices. Then there's M&A [Merger and Acquisition] activity, growth potential, and also dividends. So there are a lot of things that a gold stock can provide that a physical metal cannot, but it depends on the risk profile of the specific investor.
Jeff: It's interesting you bring up dividends, because gold and silver miners don't pay very high dividends. Do you think that could change given the high margins the industry is seeing?
John: Good point. The returns on capital as an industry have gone to very good levels, and if they’re sustained, which obviously depends on the gold price continuing to do well, they’re going to have too much cash to reinvest in the business. And the smarter companies will realize they have an opportunity to become core yield stocks that have the same panache as, say, Microsoft, IBM, Exxon Mobil, etc. If they play their cards right, they could become core holdings of bank trust departments and open the door to an entirely new audience of investors. That's how you'll get good valuations in the gold stocks.
Jeff: Which brings up the possibility that maybe we won't eventually sell all our gold stocks, if they start paying high dividends…
John: Right. If the macroclimate is favorable for gold and we don’t blow up into a crisis where it's the end of the world, but instead get a steady state of rising prices, then gold stocks could take on a completely different identity. They’re viewed now as mostly fringe investments, but there was a time, back in the '60s and '70s, when they were viewed as pretty standard stuff for an investment portfolio.
Jeff: How do you go about evaluating a mining stock?
John: We have a group of analysts here in New York who meet with management teams all year round. There isn't a day that goes by that we don’t have one, two, three, or more companies coming to see us, and the reason is that the industry is generally capital intensive and needs money. So we're sort of the go-to "piggy bank."
In addition to that, our guys know rocks and travel far and wide to look at mine sites all over the world. I think we've logged over half a million miles in the last five years going to god-awful places – this is not a Club Med itinerary. So we're able to develop conviction about owning some of these earlier-stage junior mining companies that aren't on the radar screen of our competitors. In fact, our average market cap in the Tocqueville Gold Fund is 60% of our peer group, which would indicate a weighting towards earlier-stage companies.
Jeff: So the fund invests quite a bit in juniors.
John: Absolutely. We have to be careful with it, of course, because they're less liquid and riskier, but the fact that we have this sort of database of information from these meetings gives us a fair amount of success in terms of picking the good ones. Obviously there are plenty we've missed that are good, and there are plenty we've invested in that turned out not to be so great, so it's always a bit of a trial-and-error thing. But we have found that when we buy into a company at an early stage that meets its milestones and advances from A to B and then from B to C, they’ll need more money and we'll continue to finance them along the way. That is the single biggest source of our success.
Our turnover rate is very low – less than 10% – so we basically take a long-term investment view on what we think are the very best emerging mining companies.
Jeff: Any closing comments for gold investors?
John: Gold may go sideways for a while, which is my wish, but who knows what's going to happen? Things could blow up, so trying to trade in and out is a huge mistake, in my opinion. To me, the most intelligent view of gold has to be from a strategic point of view. Get over the fact that it's gone up a lot, then try to be as clever as you can about legging into it. The bottom line is, you've got to own gold in this environment.
Jeff: Good advice, John. Thanks for your time.
John: You're welcome.
----
[John Hathaway is only one of many fund managers who are betting on gold and major gold stocks now, and the investing crowd is starting to catch on as well. Get into the best of the best gold and silver producers now – and take advantage of the BIG GOLD Holiday Special. Sign up today for BIG GOLD at $79 per year and receive one year of Casey’s Energy Opportunities FREE. But hurry, this offer ends soon. Details here.]
-- Posted Thursday, 16 December 2010 | Digg This Article
| Source: GoldSeek.com
