-- Posted Thursday, 21 October 2004 | Digg This Article
October 20 - Gold $423 up $3.10 - Silver $7.31 up 17 cents Go GATA, Go Red Sox, Go Gold The pessimist sees difficulty in every opportunity. The optimist sees the opportunity in every difficulty...Winston Churchill GO GATA!!! The following is from my 10/11 MIDAS: "Still a Red Sox fan. Love my old park. Unless you are a Yankee fan, hard not to root for the Bosox? Only question for me is who wins the day first? The Red Sox finally win the World Series again, or GATA defeats The Gold Cartel." Only few days ago the situation for both the Red Sox and GATA was bleak. The Bosox were down 3 games to zip and The Gold Cartel had stopped gold in its tracks at $420 with the specs mega-long and almost everyone predicting a "Commercials" victory – because they always win (like the rich and powerful Yankees). What a difference a few days make, days which are so supportive of the old adage, "that’s why they play the game!" The Red Sox, down 3 zip, have a chance to pull off the unimaginable if they beat the Yankees in tonight’s 7th game final of the American League playoff. The GATA ARMY has a chance to win the day versus the heinous Gold Cartel if gold takes out $430, surely thought unimaginable by cabal forces only last week. That said, the orchestrated gold close today engineered by the cabal forces was dreadful. Close, But No Cigar. In recent days I have mentioned what we needed was a $3 to sharply higher opening and then go from there to really get going. Got the $3 opening today to the penny, followed by almost perfect cooperation from outside market forces. Result: the aggravating Gold Groundhog showed up again with more of the same blatant Gold Cartel manipulation to cap the price of gold. Only the BRAIN DEAD could fail to spot this coordinated intervention. Gold closed near its lows of the trading session and $2.60 off its highs even though: *The dollar closed at 86.43, down .50, while the euro gained .68 to 125.84 *Crude oil soared to $54.93 per barrel, up a mere $1.64. *The CRB advanced closer to making 23-year highs at 227.62, up 2.21 *World stock markets were much lower, as was a sharply lower US stock market before the PPT showed up. From Houston’s Dan Norcini: Hey bill: See attached. Shows how the "gig" is played attempting to use the technicals to run the specs. Best, Dan THAT, is THE CABAL in action. The Gold Cartel is waiting for the dollar to rally a nano-tick to take gold back down below $420 and away from $430 danger. Bottom line: same stinking analysis. Until The Gold Cartel is blown up, gold goes nowhere. $423 gold IS nowhere after all these years, some $300 per ounce lower than where it should be. The Working Group on Financial Markets and Gold Cartel were able to stave off disaster today by stopping the gold advance and propping up a sinking stock market. They have been messing around in US financial markets far too long and set up the most extraordinary imbalances. While one could say they prevented defeat today, their fate is sealed. The outcome of this Orwellian misdaventure is going to end VERY badly. They will not be able to control gold too much longer and the US stock market is going to fall apart as their financial resources are exhausted. The gold open interest rose 2979 contracts to 305,2225. A wild day in the silver pits. Silver popped early to the tune of about 15 cents after the opening, mega-short Morgan Stanley then bombed it, taking silver down on the session. Big mistake. Instead of attracting other sellers, the floor and other buyers ganged up on him. In a blink, silver was up almost 25 cents. Did I see it occur? No. Both Kitco and TheBullionDesk were too overloaded to obtain quotes. The silver open interest gained 1479 contracts to 111,307. While the gold open interest is back to its highs of earlier this year, silver is more than 10% off its old highs. Plenty of room for the specs to pile in at these levels. From the MIDAS last night: An eerie message my friend Mahendra sent to his subscribers well before Comex opened: Gold prices will then move in an upward direction from mid Tuesday till wednesday. DURING THESE TWO DAYS a big player will enter the market or big money will shift in metals from either the stock market or oil. Why did gold jump today? According to the floor, "Some mysterious buyer showed up. Something else eerie here, which I will explain tomorrow. *** Here’s what happened. No more than 5 seconds after I had written down what Mahendra had sent out, he called me out of the blue. I almost fell off my chair. When I told him his ears must have been burning, he chuckled, saying this coincidence confirmed what he had sent out. It was the same sort of comment he made when we walked across the street in Dallas after our meeting/cocktail party for him in Dallas last May and the heavens opened up with rain. He said then that the deluge of rain confirmed what he came to Dallas to talk to us about. Why did I save this? Because, like many ex-pro athletes, I am a bit superstitious and did not want to jinx things for today. Spoke with Mahendra after the close again. I was ticked at today’s price management. He was laughing. Says the shorts have, and are, trapping themselves this time (taking the bait like animals do in the jungle). By the way, Mahendra’s calls on the markets continue to astound. Love to get him some media attention. If anyone out there can help, would be a great story for journalists of all kinds. They can go to: http://www.mahendraprophecy.com/ Some key charts for your review: December gold http://futures.tradingcharts.com/chart/GD/C4 Gold weekly http://futures.tradingcharts.com/chart/GD/W December dollar http://futures.tradingcharts.com/chart/US/C4 Dollar weekly http://futures.tradingcharts.com/chart/US/W
The John Brimelow Report India & Gartman too! Wednesday, October 20, 2004 Indian ex-duty premiums: AM $6.96, PM $5.27, with world gold at $419.55 and $423.45. Ample, and adequate for legal imports. Impressively resilient, considering the sharp increase in world gold. The rupee strengthened further to a 3-month high today. TOCOM activity slumped, the firmer yen probably suppressing any interest in gold futures. Volume fell 44% to only equal 11,480 Comex lots; world gold was essentially static (up 10c from the NY close); the active contract closed up 5 yen. (NY yesterday traded 45,130 contracts; open interest rose another 2,979 lots to 305,225, getting close again to the all time high.) Refco Research guessed last night that open interest would fall in the wake of the palpable defeat of the bear raid early yesterday: instead it rose. Quite possibly tomorrow will see a record: estimated volume was 50,000, with a tell-tale acceleration at the close. Institutional Analyst/groupie Dennis Gartman, finally becoming concerned about the dollar, asks the key question about gold (written very early today): "Turning then to gold, we note that once again the $420-422/oz. level is material resistance, and it has been for the past several sessions…One might reasonably ask who the sellers are that are keeping prices from rising…What is important is that the price of gold is clearly trending upward; the sellers find their offers rather readily taken; support seems to come in at progressively higher prices and resistance is steadily chipped at." Since Gartman has a fine sense about what his clients are willing to hear, gold’s friends should be grateful that he raises the (unanswered) question: any interest in the sector from this quarter is significant. JB CARTEL CAPITULATION WATCH The December 30-year bond closed at 114 1/32 up 21/32. This is at its highest levels for the move, hardly a ringing endorsement of the US economy. I’ll hang with my analysis of the past many months, one that seems so obvious. The maneuvers by the Fed and Bush Administration to prop up the economy have run their course. What lies ahead for our economy and stock markets appears ominous. Long bond: http://futures.tradingcharts.com/chart/TR/C4 The PPT is like the football teams of yesteryear that would run off tackle over and over again until it did not work any more. Only, in this case, it is their patented "Hail Mary" play used to rescue the DOW which they use over and over. The DOW was down over 90 in the early going. No matter, by the close it came back to 9986, down 11. The DOG gained 11 to 1933. S&P: http://futures.tradingcharts.com/chart/SP/C4 The oil inventory news was super bullish: 10:31 DOE reports crude oil inventories +1.2M barrels vs. expectations +1.8M barrels Gasoline inventories reported (700K) barrels vs. consensus +400K barrels. Distillate inventories reported (1.9M) barrels vs. consensus (1.0M) barrels. November crude is trading higher to $53.80/barrel in reaction to the data. * * * * *
10:33 API reports crude oil inventories (972K) barrels Distillate inventories reported (1.2M) barrels, while gasoline inventories (2.4M) barrels. Nov. WTI crude continues to trade higher, post-data, quoted last at $53.90/barrel. * * * * *
Gold Cartel crowd rats beginning to leave a sinking ship? 18:13 C reports departure of three senior officials -- Reuters (43.59) Citing an internal memo, Reuters reports Thomas Jones, CEO of Citigroup Asset Mgmt., Deryck Maughan, chairman of Citigroup Int'l, and Peter Scaturro, CEO of Citigroup Private Bank, will be leaving. Effective immediately, Citigroup Asset, Citigroup Private Bank and Travelers Life & Annuity will report to C COO Bob Willumstad. * * * * * Alan Greenspan and Wall Street have been dissing the real US inflation situation and soaring oil prices for months. Mainstream is reporting reality: Oct. 20 (Bloomberg) -- Whirlpool Corp., the world's second- largest home-appliance maker, cut its full-year profit forecast, citing higher steel and oil costs. Profit will be $5.85 to $5.95 a share, the company said in a statement distributed by PR Newswire. Whirlpool had said it would earn $6.20 to $6.35. STOCKHOLM, Oct 20 (Reuters) - Electrolux, the world's biggest home-appliance maker, cut its 2004 profit outlook in the face of fierce competition and high steel prices as it posted third-quarter profits in line with expectations. "Operating income for the full year 2004 is expected to be significantly lower than in 2003, excluding items affecting comparability," the company said in a statement on Wednesday. -END- A big miss and another chink in the cabal’s armor: Oct. 20 (Bloomberg) -- JPMorgan Chase & Co., the second- biggest U.S. bank, said quarterly profit fell 13 percent because of costs related to the July purchase of Bank One Corp. and a slump in fixed-income trading. Third-quarter net income declined to $1.42 billion, or 39 cents a share, from $1.63 billion, or 78 cents, the New York- based company said in a statement. Excluding acquisition costs, JPMorgan would have earned $2.2 billion, or 60 cents a share. The average estimate of 14 analysts was 74 cents, according to Thomson Financial. –END- Edgar Bergen must be rolling over in his grave with Treasury Secretary’s Snow's continued Charlie McCarthy puppet routine. It is beyond inane: 12:52 US Treasury's Snow repeats support for strong dollar policy --- Reuters The US dollar is trading notably lower against the euro and the yen, with gold trading sharply higher. Snow declines to comment on the latest drop in the dollar * * * * * More bad news for stock market bulls: Market Intelligence 10/20 The bulls jumped almost 5%, all the way up to 58.9%, while the bears fell to 22.1%, a drop of 1.4%. Historically, these levels have proved very negative for equities. It is hard pinpoint a single reason for this increased enthusiasm, with averages flat, or within 4%, of where they started the year, but virtually all newsletters do look for a break in the high crude prices.
There were just 19.0% in the correction camp. They are short term bearish but longer term bullish, viewing an expected pullback to be a buying opportunity.
We consider "normal" readings to be 45% for the bulls and 35% for the bears. The bulls had been well below that level mid-August, and markets rallied. The sentiment readings are used on a contrary basis.
The spread between the bulls and bears expanded to 36.8%, moving into the 35-40% range most often seen at the levels of index tops. -END- The real CPI story: The King Report M. Ramsey King Securities, Inc. Wednesday Oct. 20, 2004 – Issue 3020 "Independent View of the News" From the BLS on CPI: "Energy costs declined for the third consecutive month-- From the BLS on CPI: "Energy costs declined for the third consecutive month--down 0.4 percent in September--after advancing sharply in the first half of the year. Within energy, the index for household fuels decreased 0.9 percent, while the index for motor fuel rose 0.1 percent. The index for food was unchanged in September, as a 0.2 percent decline in the index for food at home was offset by a 0.3 percent increase in the index for food away from home." http://www.bls.gov/news.release/cpi.nr0.htm Please reread the BLS line about energy prices declining for the 3rd consecutive month. Who possibly could believe this crap? Yet we know many, particularly Wall Street shills and permabulls, do. You cannot make up stuff like this; it’s tantamount to Orwell’s "1984". Here is more altered reality foisted on the uninformed and gullible. BLS has energy prices +6.7% y/y. On 9/30/03 oil was $29ish; on 9/30/04 it was $49ish, +69% y/y…And Fed clowns keep trying to sell the notion that inflation is tame. The way CPI is compiled, there can never be meaningful inflation. Wait, the assault on one’s intelligence is worse than above. For the past three months, BLS has its CPI energy component DOWN 9.8%!!! (Check the table at above link to BLS) Thank you sir, may I have another! We’d love to administer a test to anyone involved in financial decision making that asks them that given the evidence of the past 3 to 4 months do they believe the BLS’s CPI, and in particular the energy component…BLS has the CPI energy component up only 18.6% for 2004. In our letter on Monday, we noted the following increases over the past 3.5 months: "Oil is +50%; heating oil is +54%; gasoline is +24% and natural gas is +6.5%. But the increases have not shown up in PPI or CPI." So either this month’s CPI energy index must soar or the incorruptible BLS is full of it. BLS has used vehicle prices down 1.8% y/y. Mannheim, which doesn’t sample but counts all transactions, has them +0.4%. But Mannheim does not employ hedonic adjustments. Mannheim explains the problem with BLS’s used vehicle methodology at: http://manheimvalueindex.com/control/indexes/oct2004-t34m4m3r1c4/comparisonCPI.php There is more hilarity in other categories of the CPI release and tables, but we don’t feel the need to delve further to prove the obvious. How come in BLS substitution policy, there is never upward substitution if prices fall? If steak prices soar, the BLS assumes people will ‘substitute’ ground beef; and then there is no CPI increase. But what if beef prices fall? Does the BLS assume people will substitute ground sirloin for hamburger? It’s just like hedonics – there never is an adjustment for worse service or anything that might raise the CPI. Yesterday’s WSJ had some analyst downplaying hedonic adjustments. We love analysts and reporters that suddenly have to address issues like hedonic adjustments and the Biz B/D Rate when they have ignored or were not aware of it for years. Most Wall Street analysts loathe ‘doing the work’, so they ignore troubling details. If economists and analysts acknowledge the problems, they must ‘do some work’ instead of just plugging dubious data into their ‘models’ and/or making specious forecasts on spurious data…As we annually note, Q3 (July to August) CPI is one of the most massaged numbers because it is the basis of COLAs. And we are pleased that others now report that fact…We’d love to hear the WSJ’s reporter and his featured analyst’s explanation for energy in the CPI. The Social Security Administration announced a 2.7% COLA for its more than 47m recipients yesterday. This is about $25/month for the average recipient. Higher Medicare premiums will cost $11.60/month. Ergo, the US government on the paying hand (BLS) says healthcare costs are up only 4.4% y/y, but on the taking hand it exacts a higher toll…Congress is complicit in swindling the elderly - by deed or ignorance -END- With the false/gimmickry reporting we are getting from the establishment and the present administration in Washington, along with the blatant rigging of the price of gold to calm down inflation talk, one can’t help but reflect on two of my favorite movies: The Matrix and The Stepford Wives. The latest from Dennis Gartman. While, he still doesn’t get IT, DG deserves credit for at least acknowledging our camp, unlike the gold industry, whose disdain for us and negligent silence towards our evidence of price manipulation is inexcusable. "Turning then to gold, we note that once again the $420-422/oz. level is material resistance, and it has been for the past several sessions. Gold has tried vainly to push upward through that resistance, but thus far has been unable to do so. It shall likely require a move by the EUR upward through 1.2550, which shall set up any number of stops there to push gold upward through that resistance, but at this point both seem reasonably likely. We note also that the "attack" upon that resistance level in gold is being done from a higher price than previously. Driving through resistance at $420-422 when the 'attack" is begun from a base at or near to $417-419 is far easier than when the attack is begun from $410-412. "One might reasonably ask who the sellers are that are keeping prices from rising, and the conspiratorialists among us will readily say that it is a cabal of Wall Street firms who hope to defend short positions they have inherited over the years. We have listened to the conspiratorialists for years, and we actually find their "enthusiasm" refreshing even if their thesis ill-advised. What is important is that the price of gold is clearly trending upward; the sellers find their offers rather readily taken; support seems to come in at progressively higher prices and resistance is steadily material portion of that crude to the US." Ill advised? Nothing in market history has ever been this obvious! Especially today. Gold opens $3 higher. From there on in the dollar fails to rally, oil goes berserk, silver closes not far off its highs, world stock markets have closed lower and the US market tanks early on. You call that normal market action with massive floor short-covering early as the DEC contract took out fierce $423 resistance on the opening? They have you on CNBC all the time to talk about gold. You would serve them better by expounding on Tiddlywinks. This is more like it: Dear Goldman Sachs, I have a question. I have been following the gold market now for a couple of years. I have noticed that on days when the gold price declines, there is virtually no limit as to how far it falls...$6, $10, even as much as $16 in a single day it will fall. This has happened many times in the past 2 years. This usually takes place on days when the dollar is rallying modestly to greatly. However, on days when the US dollar is in steep decline, gold will almost never rally more then $4-$6. Only twice in 2 years has this happened and on the day following these events gold went into a free fall. Now my question is this, on the COT reports, I have noticed that on days when gold rallies on bad US economic news, when gold gets to this $4 to $6 rally, it is almost ALWAYS Goldman Sachs who becomes a huge seller instead of a buyer like nearly everyone else. Why do you sell so enormously on days when others are buying? In my mind, it makes no sense. Would you be able to answer this question for me. I would really appreciate it. Wendell Leytham Hi We can't comment on our trading strategies, or anyone else's. But it is important to recognize that the vast majority of trading which is reported under the rubric of Goldman, Sachs & Co., our broker dealer, is in fact undertaken on behalf of clients, i.e where we act as a dealer for someone else's trade. Only that institution could explain why they are trading in a particular way. Regards GS Investor Relations gs-investorrelations@gs.com Those clients being The Gold Cartel and allies, of course. Anecdotal gold supply input from Canada: Talked to a bullion seller today who said a customer informed him there was a 3 week wait for receipt of Maple Leafs from Bank of Nova Scotia in Vancouver (Canada’s primary retail gold supply bank). The Bank claims they have to wait for delivery from Toronto. This type of wait sounds too long for just shipment. Maybe some of your other readers can confirm possibility of tightness for ML’s. Cheers, Dave On Indian gold demand, which John Brimelow has so ably reported on over the years. His work blows away that of everyone else in the mainstream gold world: [Business India]: New Delhi, Oct 20 : MMTC Ltd, India's largest bullion trader, has been witnessing robust growth in its gold handling business since rules were eased in February allowing bullion traders to directly import.
Prior to February, the government allowed import of gold only through 17 designated agencies, apart from exporters who could source the yellow metal for value addition and overseas trade.
"Despite expectations that the bullion traders would opt to source gold on their own, MMTC continues to play a big role in import of the precious metal. We currently have 25 percent market share in India," said Sanjiv Batra, director of marketing in MMTC Ltd.
"As against 82 tonnes of gold imported by us in 2003-04, this year from April to September we have sourced 81 tonnes of gold. We expect to double this during the fiscal," Batra told IANS on the sidelines of a week-long Festival of Gold hosted by MMTC.
The largest consumer of gold, India's overall imports during the last six months has been 330 tonnes…..
"Instead of investing in bank saving, people are again investing in gold for better investment returns. This is also seeing an increase in demand for gold," said Batra.
In fact, the imports have risen from 418 tonnes in 2002-03 to 569 tonnes in 2003-04 and it is expected to be much more this year, considering that in the first six months the imports have been 330 tonnes. -END- Some thoughts from Down Under: G’Day Bill, There appears to have beena "fundamental" change in the Markets last night/yesterday, "Times are a changing"??!! Strong move in commodities last night, with the US$ Index , Dow etc showing extreme weakness. Web links: http://quotes.ino.com/ http://www.goldsheetlinks.com/kitco.htm http://news.goldseek.com/RickAckerman/1098284400.php The critical support level for the US$ Index is 84.8, and the Dow at 9840 and 9600. The critical resistance for Gold is US$ 434. If and when either of these indices breaks, then "it" might be "on" for one and all. (Pigs can also fly??!!) The other commodities are in a stage of consolidation, and therefore Gold should take priority in terms of project identification and pegging documentation. Och baye, Haggis
At least the gold shares closed on an upbeat note, finishing on their highs. The XAU closed at 101.82, up 2.87, while the HUI jumped 8 to 229.46. A move above 230 should send this index off to the races. HUI http://bigcharts.marketwatch.com/quickchart/quickchart.asp?symb=hui&sid=0&o_symb=hui&freq=1&time=8 This is the third time gold has traded up towards $430 over the past year. The other two times, the price was pounded lower as The Gold Cartel held the fort by capping those rallies and then mounted a vicious counter-attack. Until they are sent to the cleaners with $430 taken out decisively, we will not be out of harm’s way. They must be buried. Let’s hear it for Murphy’s Law. GATA BE IN IT TO WIN IT! MIDAS Appendix An excerpt from Ted Butler’s latest, which focuses on AIG and their silver/insurance price manipulation. WEEKLY COMMENTARY October 19, 2004 Right In Front Of Our Eyes By Theodore Butler Unfair and corrupt. That leads us to the next extraordinary event of the past week, Eliot Spitzer taking on the insurance industry. While I am sad that there is so much wrong in America, I am glad that there are men like Spitzer trying to right the wrong. He is a true American hero. That is why I wrote to him in the first place about silver and AIG. I knew there were few men with the courage to stand up to such a powerful corporate juggernaught. I am going to resist the temptation of patting myself on the back for first making the Spitzer and AIG link, and concentrate on analyzing the silver connection with this latest insurance industry scandal. But as I have written repeatedly, that AIG has apparently departed the silver business is solely because of Spitzer’s behind the scenes involvement. You don’t go from being the dominant force to running away for no good reason. I would suggest that those new readers unfamiliar with the issue look up past articles, as there weren’t many in the last year in which AIG was not mentioned. There are some similarities and differences between the silver market and the unfolding insurance scandal. One similarity is that the practices under attack in the insurance scandal, from bid rigging to contingent commissions, were longstanding and widespread. It was only after an outsider, Spitzer, looked at them from a different perspective, that they were seen by all to be corrupt. Similarly in silver, we have longstanding practices that defy legitimate economic explanations, like the concentrated shorting of more silver than exists and the corrupt practice of leasing. Let Spitzer publicly question those practices, and not me, and the reaction will be profound. Another similarity between the silver manipulation and the insurance scandal is that there exists an extensive body of law and regulatory apparatus expressly created to prevent the very wrongs being revealed. And in both cases, that body of law and regulatory apparatus failed to deal with the wrongdoing. In silver, the CFTC and the NYMEX actually deny any manipulation exists. It is a denial that will prove more embarrassing and damaging than the failures of the state insurance agencies that were just out to lunch. In all of Eliot Spitzer’s great successes, from the Wall Street research scandal, to the mutual fund timing scandal, to getting AIG out of the silver business, and to the new insurance scandal, there have been designated regulators who were asleep on their watch. Without him, it would surely be (crooked) business as usual. To his great credit Spitzer is obviously motivated by a desire to help the regular guy. Also to his credit is his desire to reform as opposed to just punish. He is concerned with making the system better, not destroying it. If he wanted to, he could have snapped AIG like a toothpick, in either the silver matter or this insurance issue, so compelling was their bad behavior. Also similar are the repugnant conflicts of interests that exist in both silver and insurance, from the insurance brokers taking commissions from both customers and insurance companies for the same policy, to the silver dealers taking commissions from and allocating prices for fills for tech funds and the public alike, on trades they take the other side of, as principals. Perhaps the most glaring similarity between the silver manipulation and the insurance scandal was the regular bid rigging, price fixing and lack of real competition in both. That I have consistently used these very terms to describe the silver market and they are being used by Spitzer to describe the insurance scandal is no coincidence. Neither is the fact that one firm, AIG, is central to both scams. Whether it is an insurance broker creating phony bids for insurance to rig the price, or the COMEX silver wolf pack collusively pulling bids to snooker the tech funds, this is a distinction without a difference. Both were done to create an artificial price. There are some big differences, however, between the silver manipulation and the insurance scandal. For one, I think the silver manipulation is more serious in that a single price has been manipulated, as opposed to individual insurance policies. Artificially low silver prices over the past 20 years have bankrupted some mining companies and caused the US Government to dispose of much of its silver at unfair price levels, to cite just two examples. It is because the silver manipulation is potentially more serious than the insurance, mutual fund or Wall Street research scandals, that Eliot Spitzer has chosen to work behind the scenes in silver, rather than publicly, in my opinion. Another big difference is that the insurance companies involved and others not accused, stopped their bid rigging and conflicted commission arrangements immediately. Silver is still a bid rigging and price fixing crime in progress. Sure, AIG may be gone in silver, but the wolf pack still dominates. It will be a great day indeed when we can speak of the collusive bid rigging and price fixing in silver in the past tense. The biggest difference between the silver manipulation and the insurance scandal, as well as the mutual fund and Wall Street research scandals, is that the others were unexpected and originated on basically a single complaint or revelation. Not so in silver. In silver, the manipulation has been openly discussed and debated for years. More than 3600 people, an absolutely enormous sum, have signed a petition to Eliot Spitzer beseeching his assistance. There were no such public pleas in the other scandals. In silver, the CEO’s and general counsels of the Silver Managers were personally notified of their firms’ involvement. In silver, the regulators were contacted more times than can be counted, by others and myself. There will be no claims of ignorance when silver blows. The main lesson from the shocking developments over this past week is the reconfirmation of widespread institutional financial fraud in every nook and cranny. There can be no reasonable doubt as to the extent financial institutions will go to make an easy buck. It is against this backdrop of new revelations that I raise an issue I have harped upon recently, namely where are the metal mining companies in all of this, particularly the silver mining companies, that they don’t see what is right in front of their eyes? Why a copper company, for instance, would remain silent as the price of its product drops 10% in a day, solely due to the tech funds being tricked from their paper positions is beyond me. But it is the silver mining companies, particularly PAAS, CDE, HL and SIL, which bear the greatest scrutiny. Silver has been manipulated for 20 years, copper hasn’t. Their collective silence on the silver manipulation issue defies analysis. One, PAAS, has actually taken to continue to publicly attack me, as if I’m some great enemy of silver. I had always assumed that it was stupidity, cowardice or just plain stubbornness that accounted for these miners refusing to help themselves and their shareholders by speaking out against an increasingly obvious silver manipulation. Especially since other silver miners have broken rank and bought silver. In light of this week’s new developments, namely, the base metal massacre and the Spitzer attack on the insurance industry, the silver miners continued lack of concern is bizarre. I’m starting to agree with those that have suggested a more nefarious motivation. Is there some type of quid pro quo that we can’t see? With so many new revelations concerning widespread financial fraud in so many areas, it’s getting close to the point that if you believe silver is not manipulated, you must also believe it’s the exception. Given all the facts, that’s just not reasonable. At the very least, the silver miners should be objective enough to acknowledge the possibility of a silver manipulation. The fact that they fight the very idea that it’s possible that silver is manipulated raises serious questions about their inaction. In the case of PAAS, its chairman Ross Beaty, has publicly written that gold is likely manipulated, but definitely not silver. Huh? Make no mistake; it has been the silver miners’ lack of involvement that has prolonged the manipulation. A primary producer questioning a continued low price carries more weight than an analyst’s complaint. The flip side is that if events play out as I expect, great shame will be heaped upon those miners who did nothing, and great praise on those who did something.
===================================
Copyright (c) Le Metropole Cafe, Inc.
Le Metropole Cafe is a Membership site. Visit and experience a 2-week Free Trial!
-- Posted Thursday, 21 October 2004 | Digg This Article
Previous Articles by Bill Murphy & John Brimelow, Le Metropole Cafe
|