[All hell broke loose in the Rick’s Picks forum yesterday after Mario Cavolo, an unapologetic optimist who tends to see the glass as three-quarters full, let fly with the rosiest pronouncements we’ve heard so far on a U.S. dollar that has been sinking in value for nearly ten years.  “So okay then,” wrote Mario. “We’ll devalue the dollar and a few years later, when U.S. assets are more and more attractively cheap, the money and investment and growth will start to flow back in.”  This was just too much for Robert Moore, an intrepid blogger and occasional guest essayist on this page. Mario’s entire post can be found by clicking here. Below is Robert’s response.  RA] 

And how exactly does a weakening currency result in more attractive domestic prices? Or, are you suggesting that as the currency weakens that it will mean stronger U.S. exports, and therefore greater domestic growth? if so, then how, exactly, will these miraculous exports be manufactured?  The cynic in me says that the U.S. will have to hit a very deep and rocky bottom before manufacturing and the ability to export the surplus ever returns to these shores. Our manufacturing infrastructure is decomposing, our labor rate to productivity ratios are the most God-awful on the entire planet (they are now even worse than the UK’s, and that is really saying something), and, as Wisconsin demonstrates, the people in this country still seem to feel that they are entitled to a six-figure gross income in exchange for doing manual labor that requires no more than 200 hours of vocational school training to qualify for. 

We are a long way from Mario’s utopian renaissance. However, I do agree that at some point, the “genius” target of Mario’s man-crush will succeed in devaluing the dollar past a heretofore unknown/unseen inflection point where foreign dollar holders, no longer able to trade dollars for oil or local currencies, will instead repatriate these dollars back onto U.S. shores. The result will not be real growth in the U.S. economy or increasing real incomes for American citizens. The result will be unreal nominal growth in American prices. 

I firmly contend that the global repudiation of the dollar which is just now getting under way will end up yielding a domestic repudiation of the dollar within the next 5-10 years. There are simply too many dollars in global supply for this not to come to pass. And I know you are all thinking, But what about the Fed soaking the excess supply back up by raising interest rates?  Really? Look what a measly 125 basis-point increase in the prime lending rate did to our housing market in 2007.  What do you think a real increase of 500-800 basis points will do to our economy? Now consider what a Paul Vockerian 1000-2000 basis point increase would do. I don’t think I even have to mention what a five percent increase would do the ability of the Government to service our existing debt, not to mention all the new debt that emerges from year-over-year budget deficits. 

Dollar Is Finished 

Here’s a hint:  It wouldn’t stimulate our manufacturing and exporting machine, that’s for damn sure.  Simply put, the dollar is finished as a valid measure of qualified economic capital. Finished. The game is over, even thought there still seem to be a lot of players on the field thinking that if they pick up the ball and run for the goal that they will make a difference on the scoreboard. 

Basic, untenable economic facts: 1) The dollar is a measurement of debt;  therefore the supply of dollars indicates the supply of unpaid debt; 2) all debts must either be paid in full, or defaulted on. The U.S. money masters can only have one real goal in mind, and that is to keep the dollar on life support long enough for the Chinese real estate market to implode, and for Chinese price inflation to hammer the underprivileged hard enough for the “Egyptian effect” to hit Shanghai. 

I am convinced that there is a metric. I don’t know if it is a pre-conceived dollar level on the DXY, or if it is some level of backwardation in the Gold market, but I do know that when that metric (whatever it is) is reached, there will be a statement by Bernanke (that is probably already prepared) to Congress where he makes the soft “observation” that Gold “seems” to be acting more like a global currency than simply as an input commodity to the jewelry industry.  And that will be quite a day.

***

Information and commentary contained herein comes from sources believed to be reliable, but this cannot be guaranteed. Past performance should not be construed as an indicator of future results, so let the buyer beware. There is a substantial risk of loss in futures and option trading, and even experts can, and sometimes do, lose their proverbial shirts.  Rick's Picks does not provide investment advice to individuals, nor act as an investment advisor, nor individually advocate the purchase or sale of any security or investment. From time to time, its editor may hold positions in issues referred to in this service, and he may alter or augment them at any time. Investments recommended herein should be made only after consulting with your investment advisor, and only after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company. Rick's Picks reserves the right to use e-mail endorsements and/or profit claims from its subscribers for marketing purposes. All names will be kept anonymous and only subscribers’ initials will be used unless express written permission has been granted to the contrary. All Contents © 2011, Rick Ackerman. All Rights Reserved. www.rickackerman.com

-- Posted Friday, 25 February 2011 | Digg This Article