Advertise | Bookmark | Contact Us | E-Mail List |  | Update Page | 

Commentary : Gold Review : Markets : News Wire : Quotes : Silver : Stocks - Main Page >> News >> Story  Disclaimer 
Latest Headlines

How to Spot Bottoms in Gold Stocks
By: Jordan Roy-Byrne CMT, MFTA

Did We Just Witness The Bottom in the Gold Market?
By: Plunger

Another Great Oxymoron: "LBMA Transparency"
By: Craig Hemke

Stock Markets Remains Extremely Overvalued Hussman
By: GoldCore

Gold Seeker Closing Report: Gold Holds Steady While Stocks Drop 2% More
By: Chris Mullen, Gold Seeker Report

Ira Epstein's Metals Video 11 20 2018
By: Ira Epstein

Trigger Time For Gold Stocks
By: Stewart Thomson

Chilton says CFTC found much evidence of silver rigging; Schiff calls rigging 'rumor'
By: Chris Powell

By: Gary Christenson

Powell and Gold between Inflation and Global Slowdown
By: Arkadiusz Sieron


GoldSeek Web

Armstrong thinks himself omniscient but knows nothing about anti-trust law

By: Chris Powell

 -- Published: Tuesday, 19 April 2016 | Print  | Disqus 

Dear Friend of GATA and Gold:

In commentary yesterday market analyst and newsletter writer Martin Armstrong minimized and misrepresented Deutsche Bank's admission that it manipulated the gold and futures derivatives markets with other banks.

Purporting to answer a subscriber's question --

-- Armstrong wrote that the crowing being done by "gold bugs" about Deutsche Bank's admission "is rather pathetic. It demonstrates how ignorant they are about trading and the marketplace."

Armstrong continued: "The banks have been clipping people for decades ('manipulation'). ... This 'manipulation' has always been present in every market. The dealers know where the stops are, and if they are within striking distance, they 'manipulate' the market to execute them. ... If you have never traded size, you are not qualified to comment. You obviously have never seen how banks move spreads to clip clients all the time."

But the class-action lawsuit in which Deutsche Bank has just admitted violating the law and has pledged to provide evidence incriminating its co-conspirators is emphatically not about running the stops, not about "moving the spreads," and not about what Armstrong asserts is so routine.

Rather the lawsuit is about violation of anti-trust law -- that is, about collusion among major participants in the gold and silver derivatives markets, about conspiracy.

Here are excerpts from the accusation in the lawsuit's complaint, with emphasis added in italics:

"Defendants agreed to systematically suppress the gold benchmark rate through the submission of low net demand during the fixing process and through the publication of a rate that does not reflect actual supply and demand. ...

"Defendants reached specific agreements to manipulate the price of gold on particular days on which they expected to buy large quantities of physical gold or execute or settle futures positions. In carrying out those agreements, defendants agreed to submit net demand levels that do not actually reflect their order books.

"Defendants' joint action was required to carry out such manipulation, as the submission of fake small orders to buy or large orders to sell by just one defendant would not be sufficient to alter the fixing process significantly so to produce a depressed price.

"Defendants entered into fictitious trades so as to create artificial supply or demand at the time of the PM fixing. ...

"Defendants, knowing the outcome of the PM fixing ahead of time, used this nonpublic, valuable information to execute transactions on the futures market and reap additional profits at class members' expense, while agreeing to keep this blatant misconduct hidden from their customers and from the public."

The full complaint is posted at GATA's Internet site here:

While Armstrong considers himself ominiscient even after serving seven years in federal prison, he knows nothing about anti-trust law. Indeed, he knows nothing about the class-action lawsuit about which he presumes to draw conclusions. He "knows" only that markets can move only when he thinks they should move.

Really, now: If what Deutsche Bank has just admitted is, as Armstrong says, merely routine, why has the bank agreed to pay financial damages and to provide evidence incriminating its fellow conspirators? Don't Deutsche Bank's lawyers know that Armstrong is omniscient? Or, if Armstrong told them of his omniscience, would they just consider him pathetic?

CHRIS POWELL, Secretary/Treasurer
Gold Anti-Trust Action Committee Inc.

* * *

Support GATA by purchasing recordings of the proceedings of the 2014 New Orleans Investment Conference:

Or by purchasing DVDs of GATA's London conference in August 2011 or GATA's Dawson City conference in August 2006:

Or a colorful poster of GATA's full-page ad in The Wall Street Journal on January 31, 2009:

Help keep GATA going

GATA is a civil rights and educational organization based in the United States and tax-exempt under the U.S. Internal Revenue Code. Its e-mail dispatches are free, and you can subscribe at:

To contribute to GATA, please visit:

| Digg This Article
 -- Published: Tuesday, 19 April 2016 | E-Mail  | Print  | Source:

comments powered by Disqus


Increase Text SizeDecrease Text SizeE-mail Link of Current PagePrinter Friendly PageReturn to >> Story

E-mail Page  | Print  | Disclaimer 

© 1995 - 2018 Supports

©, Gold Seek LLC

The content on this site is protected by U.S. and international copyright laws and is the property of and/or the providers of the content under license. By "content" we mean any information, mode of expression, or other materials and services found on This includes editorials, news, our writings, graphics, and any and all other features found on the site. Please contact us for any further information.

Live GoldSeek Visitor Map | Disclaimer

The views contained here may not represent the views of, its affiliates or advertisers. makes no representation, warranty or guarantee as to the accuracy or completeness of the information (including news, editorials, prices, statistics, analyses and the like) provided through its service. Any copying, reproduction and/or redistribution of any of the documents, data, content or materials contained on or within this website, without the express written consent of, is strictly prohibited. In no event shall or its affiliates be liable to any person for any decision made or action taken in reliance upon the information provided herein.