LIVE Gold Prices $  | E-Mail Subscriptions | Update GoldSeek | GoldSeek Radio 

Commentary : Gold Review : Markets : News Wire : Quotes : Silver : Stocks - Main Page >> News >> Story  Disclaimer 
Latest Headlines to Launch New Website

Is Gold Price Action Warning Of Imminent Monetary Collapse Part 2?
By: Hubert Moolman

Gold and Silver Are Just Getting Started
By: Frank Holmes, US Funds

Silver Makes High Wave Candle at Target – Here’s What to Expect…
By: Clive Maund

Gold Blows Through Upside Resistance - The Chase Is On
By: Avi Gilburt

U.S. Mint To Reduce Gold & Silver Eagle Production Over The Next 12-18 Months
By: Steve St. Angelo, SRSrocco Report

Gold's sharp rise throws Financial Times into an erroneous sulk
By: Chris Powell, GATA

Precious Metals Update Video: Gold's unusual strength
By: Ira Epstein

Asian Metals Market Update: July-29-2020
By: Chintan Karnani, Insignia Consultants

Gold's rise is a 'mystery' because journalism always fails to pursue it
By: Chris Powell, GATA


GoldSeek Web

So Much for Position Limits on COMEX Gold

-- Posted Wednesday, 15 May 2013 | | Disqus

By Gene Arensberg

HOUSTON -- We are using this space to put something in the public domain out of convenience more than anything.

Where were the regulators on gold futures position limits April 12 and April 16?

Flash back to Friday, April 12, when the paper gold futures market was slammed with an enormous sell order in the early going of New York trading, following a “tenderizing” of the market right at the New York open.

We have read and heard various descriptions of the initial sell order being as little as 124 tonnes and as much as 400 tonnes of gold equivalent – sold by a single source or by a group all at once – with the express intent to break the gold market.

Friday, April 12 5-minute tick chart courtesy of Ross Norman, Sharps-Pixley, UK.

We want to voice a concern of ours which we thought of that very day and have thought about off and on since then, but have yet to act on it. (Other than to share it with several colleagues.)

Our simple question: Where are the regulators (in this case the CFTC and CME Group) with regard to size and accountability limits?

First, though, a caveat: We do not have the actual trade data which would include the actual orders and the sellers of those orders. Without that, this is pure speculation and subject to receiving that actual data. (More...)

That said, what we do know is that the volume spiked to an unprecedented level April 12 and Monday, April 15 and that initial sale triggered an avalanche of trading and trailing stops. The net effect was that the initial order was indeed large enough and sold into the market fast enough that it literally overwhelmed the gold futures market. Whoever it was used a bazooka at a knife fight. The selling panic that ensued will be talked about for generations.

CME GROUP LOGOWhether the initial sale into the gold market was 124 tonnes or 400 tonnes is not really material to our question. Either size would be so much higher than any one trader should have been able to sell into the gold market at one time that it begs the question: How many traders would have had to be involved in order to “legally” sell that many gold futures contracts into the market?

Let’s assume for this discussion that the initial sale was 124 tonnes. That’s about 4 million ounces or the equivalent of 40,000 COMEX contracts.

From earlier work we know that the CME Group has position limits for gold futures of 3,000 contracts in the front month and 6,000 contracts in all months.

We know from the open interest that the initial sale on April 12 was concentrated in the front month, so no one trader should have been able to sell more than 3,000 contracts at one time, and that’s assuming that trader had a zero open position when the sale occurred. The 3,000 number is supposed to be the limit of all contracts and options, both long and short at any time, even intra-day.

Assuming all the traders involved had no open contracts before opening four million ounces worth, how many traders would have had to be involved? Simple math says (40,000 contracts / 3,000 lots limit) = 13.3 traders. Call it 14 traders.

So, in order for the initial 124 tonne sale to have occurred“legally” it would have had to have been 14 traders, all with zero orders open, all acting simultaneously, all acting independently, in their own self-interest, without colluding with each other to “sell-for-effect” or conspiring to foment a price smash.

In actuality, the chances that there were 14 traders who held zero open orders all acting independently, all throwing their full allowable 3,000 contracts into the gold market within a few minutes of each other are infinitesimally small.

Much more likely is that the initial sale which triggered the sell stop putsch in gold was done by a single trader, acting so far outside the position limit regime as to be brazen about it.

How about a few facts:

At the time of the large sale on April 12, the gold price was breaking through $1,520.

4 million ounces at $1,520 is roughly $6 billion in notional value.

40,000 contracts would have required about (40,000 X $5,940) = $237.6 million in initial performance bond requirements, if the traders were Spec members. (CME Group subsequently raised Spec initial margin to $7,040 for the close on April 16.) If the big seller was a commercial hedge member, then it would have required (40,000 X $5,400) = $216 million in initial bond requirement. (CME Group subsequently raised Hedger initial margin to $6,400 for the close on April 16.)

At the time of the large sale the COMEX open interest was a little over 416,000 contracts. So the initial sale was about 10% of the entire open interest of the COMEX. There was little change in the number of contracts open as of Tuesday, April 16, by the way (413,083).

A few questions:

Who was the large trader who decided to hammer the gold market with 40,000 contracts all at once?

How did that trader manage to do so without running afoul of the CME Group position limits or the CFTC regulators?

Was the initial trade by one, two or many traders? If by one or two, then there is no way in hell the trade was “legal” under the position limits.

If by many traders all acting at once, then how is that possible without their conspiring in advance to do so? (We are talking about the initial smash trade here, not the ensuing stops triggered.)

We invite well-informed commentary on this subject and would be grateful to any N.Y. traders who know the facts to comment either here on the blog or privately.

We suppose it is possible that the initial sale was actually much smaller than 124 tonnes, but that it triggered a series of sell stops that collectively amounted to that much, but we are doubtful that the sale which triggered this sell down was “legit” when we look at the facts.

Our sense is that no one would sell that many gold contracts so fast unless it was with the express intent to drive the market lower and by doing so, trigger sell stops of many other traders - which is, of course, trading for effect, which is patently illegal. (And yes, we know it happens all the time, but there you go.)

Our sense is that we won’t be bothered with any commentary or enforcement action by the CME Group or the CFTC on this issue. The history of the paper gold and silver futures markets suggests that rules and position limits are just so much sausage – to be ground up by a few elite traders from time to time.

Not that we are complaining, mind you. We are merely trying to understand if there really are position limits and whether they should have come into play on April 12, 2013.

Edit to add: A trader buddy, responding to our inquiry reminds: “The hedge members can use their bona fide hedger exemptions to sell more than the limit, but not without filing paperwork with the exchange.”

If true, and we do believe it is true, then whoever blew out the gold market on April 12 is already known to the CFTC (and what documentation they used to back up their trade). But don't hold your breath waiting to hear about if from the CFTC under Goldman Sachs-ex Gary Gensler.

Mr. Gensler is a Goldman sausage grinder from way back...

Gene Arensberg for Got Gold Report

-- Posted Wednesday, 15 May 2013 | Digg This Article | Source:

comments powered by Disqus


Increase Text SizeDecrease Text SizeE-mail Link of Current PagePrinter Friendly PageReturn to >> Story

E-mail Page  | Print  | Disclaimer 

© 1995 - 2019 Supports

©, Gold Seek LLC

The content on this site is protected by U.S. and international copyright laws and is the property of and/or the providers of the content under license. By "content" we mean any information, mode of expression, or other materials and services found on This includes editorials, news, our writings, graphics, and any and all other features found on the site. Please contact us for any further information.

Live GoldSeek Visitor Map | Disclaimer


The views contained here may not represent the views of, Gold Seek LLC, its affiliates or advertisers., Gold Seek LLC makes no representation, warranty or guarantee as to the accuracy or completeness of the information (including news, editorials, prices, statistics, analyses and the like) provided through its service. Any copying, reproduction and/or redistribution of any of the documents, data, content or materials contained on or within this website, without the express written consent of, Gold Seek LLC, is strictly prohibited. In no event shall, Gold Seek LLC or its affiliates be liable to any person for any decision made or action taken in reliance upon the information provided herein.