Advertise | Bookmark | Contact Us | E-Mail List |  | Update Page | UraniumSeek.com 

Commentary : Gold Review : Markets : News Wire : Quotes : Silver : Stocks - Main Page 

 GoldSeek.com >> News >> Story  Disclaimer 
 
Latest Headlines

What History Says for Gold Stocks in 2018-2019
By: Jordan Roy-Byrne CMT, MFTA

Jack Chan's Weekly Precious Metals Market Update
By: Jack Chan

Synchronized Global Growth May Have Arrived
By: Frank Holmes

Gold Versus Bitcoin: The Pro-Gold Argument Takes Shape
By: GoldCore

Asian Metals Market Update: November-21-2017
By: Chintan Karnani, Insignia Consultants

Gold Seeker Closing Report: Gold and Silver Give Back Friday’s Gains
By: Chris Mullen, Gold Seeker Report

Operation Twist By Another Name and Method?
By: Gary Tanashian

SWOT Analysis: Gold Bounced Back After Attempts to Knock Down Price
By: Frank Holmes

Hyperinflation in Zimbabwe – It’s back, but maybe not for long
By: JP Koning

Gold Versus Bitcoin: The Pro-Gold Argument Takes Shape
By: John Rubino

 
Search

GoldSeek Web

 
Gold Mini Plunges!


 -- Published: Friday, 18 July 2014 | Print  | Disqus 

TECHNICAL SCOOP

CHART OF THE WEEK

Charts and commentary by David Chapman

26 Wellington Street East, Suite 900, Toronto, Ontario, M5E 1S2

Phone (416) 604-0533 or (toll free) 1-866-269-7773 , fax (416) 604-0557

david@davidchapman.com

dchapman@mgisecurities.com

www.davidchapman.com

Source: www.sharelynx.com                                                                                 

It was a jarring wakeup call this past Monday July 14, 2014 when everyone discovered that gold had plummeted some $30 overnight. It was the largest one-day drop for gold in 2014 and it almost was as large a down as the up day on June 19, 2014 following the June FOMC. It came just as gold appeared poised to move above $1,340/$1,350 and challenge the March 2014 highs up to $1,380. It was it seems not to be.

 

So what happened? Daily charts were mildly overbought, but weekly charts had considerable room to move higher. There was no particular news or events over the weekend that should have triggered the sell-off. The drop got underway shortly after 2 AM (New York time) in London when a seller of gold futures came in and pushed gold down roughly from $1,330 to $1,320. A bigger drop came later on and near the open in New York when someone dumped about $1.37 billion of gold futures pushing gold down to almost $1,300. Volume spiked on each collapse.

 

There were few explanations. Yes, the problems in Portugal’s banking centre surrounding Banco Espirito Santo appeared to be under control and they were attempting to obtain a cease-fire between Israel and Hamas but there was no strong news that should have pushed the market down that much. No other markets were making any particular move.

 

But there was more. On Tuesday July 15, 2014, Janet Yellen was telling everyone that the economy was “ok” but they didn’t want to encourage too much enthusiasm so the Fed would remain dovish and keep interest rates low for the foreseeable future.  As everyone was nodding their heads another 17,000 gold futures contracts worth roughly $2.3 billion hit the market around 11 AM pushing gold prices swiftly down to about $1,290. As was usual the order came when volume was light and there was little resistance. That the market only fell roughly $16 to $20 was probably the only surprise considering the order to sell was larger than the one seen a day earlier.

 

It wasn’t surprising finding pundits following the gold dump on Tuesday that they thought the real reason gold was dumped was because Yellen wasn’t as dovish as they wanted. If one thinks about that, one would also realize that is a “pile of crock”. Five years after one of the biggest financial crashes in history, the global economy remains moribund at best and on the edge of another crisis at worst. Yet that hasn’t stopped the US stock market from rising to all-time highs pushed by abnormally low interest rates and riding on a sea of liquidity provided by the Fed and other central banks in the EU and Japan.

 

So dare I ask? Was the gold dump “manipulation”? No this dump wasn’t as big as the dump on April 12 and 15, 2013 when over $23 billion worth of gold futures were dumped on the market causing a panic and pushing gold down $200. It was, however, one of the most dramatic dumps ever in gold history. To this day I have never seen a complete explanation as to who it was and why. Given the sales in April 2013 and the most recent sales came in large blocks all at once in thin market conditions suggests that it was one seller. No one with considerable size to move in a market would normally act in such a manner as to cause a panic, unless it was deliberate.

 

“Manipulation” is a difficult word to use when it comes to markets. Market participants would like to believe that the market is not manipulated to the benefit of a few and the detriment of most. But “manipulation” it appears is common and ongoing whether in the stock market, commodity markets and the gold market. Some of the largest and best-known investment banks in the world have paid billions in fines for manipulation of the LIBOR market, the currency market, the energy market and the sub-prime mortgage market. As is always the case they admit nothing, no one is arrested and they pay their fines totalling in the billions. But the fines are often a fraction of the profits they made suggesting that the fines are treated as a “cost of doing business”.

 

Are large investment banking houses behind the latest sell-off for gold? I don’t know. A name consistently mentioned is JP Morgan Chase (JPM-NYSE). It is believed that they have accumulated a huge short position in gold futures. Why would they or others do this? One possible reason mentioned here in the past is so they can buy physical gold at lower prices to cover positions from their leased gold. It was noted years ago that there was a suspected huge short position in central bank gold because of leasing. Could central banks requesting their gold back have triggered a move to try to buy back the short gold (physical)?

 

Other rumours have included the Fed itself although if it were they would most likely do it through proxies. It has been discovered that the Fed has been a huge buyer of US Treasuries through proxies in other countries even as they have been “tapering” QE. The result is that the Fed has purchased some 80% of Treasury issuances in 2014. If they are using proxies to purchase bonds, they could also be using proxies to sell gold futures. Other central banks could be involved as well. Even others such as China and Russia who have been large buyers of gold for their central banks have been suspected. A suppressed gold price would allow them to accumulate more physical gold at lower prices.

 

It could even be the US Treasury again through proxies and the Exchange Stabilization Fund (ESF) aka the plunge protection team. Showing that gold is a useless investment and a barbarous relic would suit the US when others have been calling for a new reserve currency backed by gold.

 

Could gold prices fall further? Yes. A drop in gold prices below $1,280 would suggest a test of $1,240/$1,250. Below that level and especially below $1,220 a test of $1,180 and the June and December 2013 lows could get underway. A sharp break under $1,180 could cause a panic and a sell off to $1,100 and even $1,000. All of this is in the “could” category. Will it, is another question and an unknown.  Cycles suggest that the major low in gold should already be in.

 

So am I bearish on gold? Well short term one certainly has to be cautious because another April 2013 debacle could occur. Maybe just the fear of it occurring again means it may never happen. But that may be wishful thinking at the moment. Long term I remain quite bullish primarily because many of the conditions that took gold to $1,900 in 2011 have never really left. They have instead gotten worse.

 

The stock market is overvalued by numerous measurements. Many believe that valuations are higher than they were in 2007 before the 2008 financial crash and in some instances approaching where they were in 2000 prior to the high tech/internet crash.  Seems that even Warren Buffet has noted the market as being overvalued. Janet Yellen commented on the stock market sounding strangely like Alan Greenspan circa 1996 and his “irrational exuberance” statement. While there is evidence the smart money is getting out, funds still pour into the stock market because they believe they have to be there or they will miss it.

 

Global debt today is at higher levels then it was in 2007 prior to the 2008 financial crisis. Government debt to GDP, government debt to revenue and total debt (government, corporate and consumer) debt to GDP levels are all higher around the world today than they were in 2007. Japan is the worst. But the US isn’t far behind. In the EU it varies from country to country but Great Britain is the worst, even worse than Greece, Italy, Spain or Portugal. Yes Britain can absorb it better. Or can they?

 

Austerity measures in Britain or elsewhere have not been accepted and social unrest and the rise of xenophobic right wing parties has been a by-product of the global financial crisis. GDP growth since 2000 and probably from even earlier has been almost solely because of the huge rise in debt not because the economies are actually performing well. An exception of course has been China although even they and other emerging economies have succumbed to growing their economies through the issuance of more debt. Debt levels have become so high that some officials have expressed concerns that another Lehman Brothers type of collapse could happen.

 

And then there is the Quadrillion dollar plus derivatives market. The derivatives market maintains its mantle as the accident that could happen and bring down the global banking system. Even a partial collapse in the derivatives market could wipe out the capital of many global banks. Leverage levels at the major global banks remain at 20%, 30% and higher at levels seen before the financial crash of 2008. The large investment banks were behind the financial crash of 2008 than bailed out by the taxpayer and have fought reform even since.

 

The global geopolitical situation remains in flux. The wars and strife may come off the front page but in behind the wars and conflicts continue. Russia/Ukraine, Israel/Palestine, Syria/Iraq, Libya and China/Japan/USA are today the worst. The fear is that they spread or an accident occurs that triggers a wider conflict. Ratcheting up sanctions against Russia may play well on the domestic front in the US but the EU and others are refusing to go along with the game. Russia is the eighth largest economy in the world and combined with China and the other BRICS they have the capability and capacity to make things difficult economically for the US and the West.  But as noted take the geopolitical conflicts off the front page and everyone quickly forgets they are happening, that is until they flare up again.

 

 

 Charts created using Omega TradeStation 2000i.  Chart data supplied by Dial Data

 

Gold has suffered a mini plunge by parties unknown and for unknown reasons. An event such as the Malaysian passenger plane allegedly shot down over Eastern Ukraine today could spark a short covering rally. Then again they may be back again for another “dump”. That is why it is important for gold to take out key levels to the upside to send the bears scurrying for cover. The key levels are at $1,380 the March 2014 high, $1,430 the August 2013 high and $1,550 regaining the breakdown level prior to the April 2013 collapse. Until those happen gold remains in a bear market with risk to the downside from parties unknown to “manipulate” gold lower.

 

Copyright 2014 All rights reserved David Chapman

General Disclosures

The information and opinions contained in this report were prepared by Industrial Alliance Securities Inc. (‘IA Securities’). IA Securities is subsidiary of Industrial Alliance Insurance and Financial Services Inc. (‘Industrial Alliance’). Industrial Alliance is a TSX Exchange listed company and as such, IA Securities is an affiliate of Industrial Alliance. The opinions, estimates and projections contained in this report are those of IA Securities as of the date of this report and are subject to change without notice. IA Securities endeavours to ensure that the contents have been compiled or derived from sources that we believe to be reliable and contain information and opinions that are accurate and complete. However, IA Securities makes no representations or warranty, express or implied, in respect thereof, takes no responsibility for any errors and omissions contained herein and accepts no liability whatsoever for any loss arising from any use of, or reliance on, this report or its contents. Information may be available to IA Securities that is not reflected in this report. This report is not to be construed as an offer or solicitation to buy or sell any security. The reader should not rely solely on this report in evaluating whether or not to buy or sell securities of the subject company.

 

Definitions

“Technical Strategist” means any partner, director, officer, employee or agent of IA Securities who is held out to the public as a strategist or whose responsibilities to IA Securities include the preparation of any written technical market report for distribution to clients or prospective clients of IA Securities which does not include a recommendation with respect to a security.

 

 “Technical Market Report” means any written or electronic communication that IA Securities has distributed or will distribute to its clients or the general public, which contains an strategist’s comments concerning current market technical indicators.

 

Conflicts of Interest

The technical strategist and or associates who prepared this report are compensated based upon (among other factors) the overall profitability of IA Securities, which may include the profitability of investment banking and related services. In the normal course of its business, IA Securities may provide financial advisory services for issuers. IA Securities will include any further issuer related disclosures as needed.

 

Technical Strategists Certification

Each IA Securities technical strategist whose name appears on the front page of this technical market report hereby certifies that (i) the opinions expressed in the technical market report accurately reflect the technical strategist’s personal views about the marketplace and are the subject of this report and all strategies mentioned in this report that are covered by such technical strategist and (ii) no part of the technical strategist’s compensation was, is, or will be directly or indirectly, related to the specific views expressed by such technical strategies in this report.

 

Technical Strategists Trading

IA Securities permits technical strategists to own and trade in the securities and or the derivatives of the sectors discussed herein.

 

Dissemination of Reports

IA Securities uses its best efforts to disseminate its technical market reports to all clients who are entitled to receive the firm’s technical market reports, contemporaneously on a timely and effective basis in electronic form, via fax or mail. Selected technical market reports may also be posted on the IA Securities website and davidchapman.com.

 

For Canadian Residents: This report has been approved by IA Securities, which accepts responsibility for this report and its dissemination in Canada. Canadian clients wishing to effect transactions should do so through a qualified salesperson of IA Securities in their particular jurisdiction where their IA is licensed.

 

For US Residents: This report is not intended for distribution in the United States. 

 

Intellectual Property Notice

The materials contained herein are protected by copyright, trademark and other forms of proprietary rights and are owned or controlled by IA Securities or the party credited as the provider of the information.

 

Regulatory

IA Securities is a member of the Canadian Investor Protection Fund (‘CIPF’) and the Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada (‘IIROC’).

 

Copyright

All rights reserved. All material presented in this document may not be reproduced in whole or in part, or further published or distributed or referred to in any manner whatsoever, nor may the information, opinions or conclusions contained in it be referred to without in each case the prior express written consent of IA Securities Inc.


| Digg This Article
 -- Published: Friday, 18 July 2014 | E-Mail  | Print  | Source: GoldSeek.com

comments powered by Disqus



 



Increase Text SizeDecrease Text SizeE-mail Link of Current PagePrinter Friendly PageReturn to GoldSeek.com

 news.goldseek.com >> Story

E-mail Page  | Print  | Disclaimer 


© 1995 - 2017



GoldSeek.com Supports Kiva.org

© GoldSeek.com, Gold Seek LLC

The content on this site is protected by U.S. and international copyright laws and is the property of GoldSeek.com and/or the providers of the content under license. By "content" we mean any information, mode of expression, or other materials and services found on GoldSeek.com. This includes editorials, news, our writings, graphics, and any and all other features found on the site. Please contact us for any further information.

Live GoldSeek Visitor Map | Disclaimer

The views contained here may not represent the views of GoldSeek.com, its affiliates or advertisers. GoldSeek.com makes no representation, warranty or guarantee as to the accuracy or completeness of the information (including news, editorials, prices, statistics, analyses and the like) provided through its service. Any copying, reproduction and/or redistribution of any of the documents, data, content or materials contained on or within this website, without the express written consent of GoldSeek.com, is strictly prohibited. In no event shall GoldSeek.com or its affiliates be liable to any person for any decision made or action taken in reliance upon the information provided herein.