Advertise | Bookmark | Contact Us | E-Mail List |  | Update Page | UraniumSeek.com 

Commentary : Gold Review : Markets : News Wire : Quotes : Silver : Stocks - Main Page 

 GoldSeek.com >> News >> Story  Disclaimer 
 
Latest Headlines

Gold Seeker Weekly Wrap-Up: Gold and Silver Gain Over 1% and 2% on the Week
By: Chris Mullen, Gold Seeker Report

Ira Epstein's Metals Video 11 17 2017
By: Ira Epstein

Next-Generation Crazy: The Fed Plans For The Coming Recession
By: John Rubino

COT Gold, Silver and US Dollar Index Report - November 17, 2017
By: GoldSeek.com

Gold Miners’ Q3’17 Fundamentals
By: Adam Hamilton, CPA

Bonfire of the Absurdities
By: John Mauldin

The Social Security Inflation Lag Calendar - Partial Indexing Part 1
By: Daniel R. Amerman, CFA

Rob From The Middle Class Economics
By: Gary Christenson

GoldSeek Radio Nugget: John Williams and Chris Waltzek
By: radio.GoldSeek.com

The Metals Market Is A Mess And Will Likely Continue To Frustrate You
By: Avi Gilburt

 
Search

GoldSeek Web

 
Gold and Silver Price Discovery - When the Wrong Men Use the Right Means


 -- Published: Friday, 28 November 2014 | Print  | Disqus 

By Dr. Jeffrey Lewis

I’m not a real farmer. But I suffer the lessons and I do my best when I talk with friends, neighbors, and families about the unintended benefits of ‘growing your own’…

..There is universal agreement about the problem of not really knowing where ‘the food’ comes from.

That may be at the core but is the basis for another fiasco of ignorance. The basic need for fair value underlies civil society; it is part and parcel to understanding where the food comes from.

I referenced this piece for readers over the weekend.

“Veteran S&P Futures Trader: "I Am 100% Confident That Central Banks Are Buying S&P Futures"

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2014-11-22/veteran-sp-futures-trader-i-am-100-confident-central-banks-are-buying-sp-futures

I have been an independent trader for 23 years, starting at the CBOT in grains and CME in the S&P 500 futures markets long ago while they were auction outcry markets (and have stayed in the alternative investment space ever since). Now, I run a small fund.

I understand better than most, I would think, the "mechanics" of the markets and how they have evolved over time from the auction market to 'upstairs".  I am a self-taught, top down global macro economist as well as historian of "money" and the Fed and all economic and governmental structures in the world. 

One thing so many managers don't understand is that the markets take away the most amounts of money from the most amounts of people, and do so non-linearly.  Most sophisticated investors know to be successful, one must be a contrarian; and this philosophy is in parallel. 

Markets will, on all time scales, through exponential decay (fat tails, or black swans, on longer term scales), or exponential growth of price itself.  Why was I so bearish on gold at its peak a few years back for instance?  Because of the ascent of non-linearity of price and the massive consensus buildup of bulls. 

I believe Didier Sornette, author of "Why Stock Markets Crash", correctly summarizes Power Law Behavior, or exponential consensus, and how it lead to crashes.  The buildup of buyers' zeal, and the squeezing of shorts, leads to that "complex system" popping.  I have traded as a contrarian with these philosophies for some time.

The author makes an excellent case for the Fed intervention in the equity market.

‘Equity market” could refer to any array or combination of companies using all manner of derivative products trading twenty four hours per day, nearly seven days per week.

The entire is well worth the read. But, it was his description of how he saw the gold bubble that I got me thinking. Like everything, the further you go down the rabbit hole, the farther from familiarity you go. In the case of finance — far from reality.

While it appears to be very detailed, it comes nowhere close to the surface of what happens in the trenches of price discovery…and what has been entrenched as the 'normal' course of COMEX business for decades.

Once an outcry floor worked by the ‘everyman’, protected by camaraderie and common sense; futures markets are now infested with a faceless ivory tower elite. An algorithm for disaster.

Before being replaced by programs, the floor traders were a close-nit gallery of regular people with an affinity for dealing and managing emotions. The markets were fast, efficient, imperfect, but protected by an unspoken code of honor that played as the middle man. How unromantic and rudimentary that must have been for today’s central planning, champaign socialist elite. And yet, it worked.

There is no middle man anymore.

Once the golden shackles were broken, big finance crept in and transformed the mechanics of price discovery. Faces were replaced with cables connected to servers in some new virtual reality. What we have today is an opaque tapestry of algorithms working independent of reality. 

Ultimately, they disappear in the wake left behind by the natural market. This pricing mechanism is a living fantasy that is worshipped by a legion of direct and indirect beneficiaries. Derivatives wagging dogs.

But the risk is real. Responsibility for consequence gone. In 2011, everything happening in reality was woven into a narrative that fit the price discovery. Price action made the commentary. Gold wasn't a bubble - the move didn't move the masses.

In a fiat system, gold and silver will always be either bubble asset or hated asset.

In September and October of 2010, long before the parabolic ascent to come as the price flirted with $1000, consensus was convinced it was a bubble. Plenty of evidence suggests direct intervention. All along the way, the ascent toward $2000 gold faced all manner of attempts by bullion banks to slow the price.

GATA.org is an absolute must read in order to establish the premise and deep foundation of opaque, yet legal intervention.

Writing options, activity in the miners or adding selling positions can cap the daily price movements which, no doubt, appear omniscient and legitimate by taking the other side of the action then finally adding selling positions to slow down the rise in price.

Observers had been calling for the drop in price; they had to be right eventually. And there is a pseudo-science for interpreting the movements of manipulated markets.

So what?

The only thing one can know for sure is a scary reality. Nothing has changed.

Gold is managed. Then and now.

The whole thing reminds me of the old Chinese expression:

When the wrong man uses the right means, the right means work in the wrong way.

http://www.silver-coin-investor.com/


| Digg This Article
 -- Published: Friday, 28 November 2014 | E-Mail  | Print  | Source: GoldSeek.com

comments powered by Disqus



 



Increase Text SizeDecrease Text SizeE-mail Link of Current PagePrinter Friendly PageReturn to GoldSeek.com

 news.goldseek.com >> Story

E-mail Page  | Print  | Disclaimer 


© 1995 - 2017



GoldSeek.com Supports Kiva.org

© GoldSeek.com, Gold Seek LLC

The content on this site is protected by U.S. and international copyright laws and is the property of GoldSeek.com and/or the providers of the content under license. By "content" we mean any information, mode of expression, or other materials and services found on GoldSeek.com. This includes editorials, news, our writings, graphics, and any and all other features found on the site. Please contact us for any further information.

Live GoldSeek Visitor Map | Disclaimer

The views contained here may not represent the views of GoldSeek.com, its affiliates or advertisers. GoldSeek.com makes no representation, warranty or guarantee as to the accuracy or completeness of the information (including news, editorials, prices, statistics, analyses and the like) provided through its service. Any copying, reproduction and/or redistribution of any of the documents, data, content or materials contained on or within this website, without the express written consent of GoldSeek.com, is strictly prohibited. In no event shall GoldSeek.com or its affiliates be liable to any person for any decision made or action taken in reliance upon the information provided herein.