Advertise | Bookmark | Contact Us | E-Mail List |  | Update Page | 

Commentary : Gold Review : Markets : News Wire : Quotes : Silver : Stocks - Main Page >> News >> Story  Disclaimer 
Latest Headlines

GoldSeek Radio: Peter Schiff and Bob Hoye, and Chris Waltzek

Technical Scoop - Weekend Update May 28
By: David Chapman

Getting Rich On Taxpayer-Backed Subprime Mortgages
By: Dave Kranzler

How Do You Make Money With A Broken Clock?
By: Avi Gilburt

High Yield Train Wreck
By: John Mauldin

Gold, US Stocks and Bonds
By: Gary Tanashian

The Next Populist Political Issue Emerges: CEO Pay
By: John Rubino

Does Your Pension Fund Have Enough Gold
By: David Morgan

Gold Seeker Weekly Wrap-Up: Gold and Silver Find Slight Gains on the Week
By: Chris Mullen, Gold Seeker Report

Ira Epstein's Metals Video 5 25 2018
By: Ira Epstein


GoldSeek Web

S&P Cycles Suggest Caution

 -- Published: Wednesday, 8 April 2015 | Print  | Disqus 

By Gary Christenson

The S&P 500 Index has been levitated for 6 years by easy money, low interest rates, buy backs of corporate stock, and so much more.

Can it rally for another 6 years?

I doubt it.  

Examine the following log scale monthly chart of the S&P.


Items to note:

  • Vertical blue lines show lows – about every 8.75 years.
  • Vertical red lines show tops – about every 7.5 years.
  • The “danger zone” is the area of the red upward trending support line. When the S&P has reached a long-term top area (vertical red line) and has fallen below the red support line, look out below.
  • We are close to a danger zone (approximately 2000 – 2050) as of the end of March 2015.

Does this mean a stock market crash is coming?  Certainly not!  The financial powers-that-be might prolong this rally several more months or even several years, although my take is that an extension into 2016 is unlikely.  However, easy money, bond monetization, zero interest rates, negative bond yields in Europe, and fear of a deflationary collapse can work wonders to support over-extended markets, so we can’t rule out even higher prices.

But given that the S&P has rallied since early 2009, experienced only a minor correction in 2011, is currently at a cyclic peak, clearly over-bought on a monthly and weekly basis, and has been artificially sustained by central bank easy money, is it likely that the next MAJOR move is up or down?  My bet is down. 

I hear your objection.  Can we trust cycles?  In my opinion they are useful but not absolute.  However, long-term cycles are more trustworthy than short term cycles.  Use them in conjunction with other confirmation.

But considering that silver is off about 2/3 from its high nearly 4 years ago and the S&P has been rallying for 6 years, I find silver a far more compelling investment than the S&P.

Gary Christenson

The Deviant Investor

| Digg This Article
 -- Published: Wednesday, 8 April 2015 | E-Mail  | Print  | Source:

comments powered by Disqus


Increase Text SizeDecrease Text SizeE-mail Link of Current PagePrinter Friendly PageReturn to >> Story

E-mail Page  | Print  | Disclaimer 

© 1995 - 2017 Supports

©, Gold Seek LLC

The content on this site is protected by U.S. and international copyright laws and is the property of and/or the providers of the content under license. By "content" we mean any information, mode of expression, or other materials and services found on This includes editorials, news, our writings, graphics, and any and all other features found on the site. Please contact us for any further information.

Live GoldSeek Visitor Map | Disclaimer

The views contained here may not represent the views of, its affiliates or advertisers. makes no representation, warranty or guarantee as to the accuracy or completeness of the information (including news, editorials, prices, statistics, analyses and the like) provided through its service. Any copying, reproduction and/or redistribution of any of the documents, data, content or materials contained on or within this website, without the express written consent of, is strictly prohibited. In no event shall or its affiliates be liable to any person for any decision made or action taken in reliance upon the information provided herein.