Advertise | Bookmark | Contact Us | E-Mail List |  | Update Page | UraniumSeek.com 

Commentary : Gold Review : Markets : News Wire : Quotes : Silver : Stocks - Main Page 

 GoldSeek.com >> News >> Story  Disclaimer 
 
Latest Headlines

Gold Seeker Weekly Wrap-Up: Gold and Silver Gain Over 1% and 2% on the Week
By: Chris Mullen, Gold Seeker Report

Ira Epstein's Metals Video 11 17 2017
By: Ira Epstein

Next-Generation Crazy: The Fed Plans For The Coming Recession
By: John Rubino

COT Gold, Silver and US Dollar Index Report - November 17, 2017
By: GoldSeek.com

Gold Miners’ Q3’17 Fundamentals
By: Adam Hamilton, CPA

Bonfire of the Absurdities
By: John Mauldin

The Social Security Inflation Lag Calendar - Partial Indexing Part 1
By: Daniel R. Amerman, CFA

Rob From The Middle Class Economics
By: Gary Christenson

GoldSeek Radio Nugget: John Williams and Chris Waltzek
By: radio.GoldSeek.com

The Metals Market Is A Mess And Will Likely Continue To Frustrate You
By: Avi Gilburt

 
Search

GoldSeek Web

 
The Money Has To Go Somewhere...


 -- Published: Wednesday, 29 April 2015 | Print  | Disqus 

By Bill Holter

The following chart from the Federal Reserve's own data pretty much sums up America

 


   

The rate of home ownership and the labor participation rate peaked about 10-15 years ago and it's been downhill since.  Do you have any wonder after looking at this chart why if it "feels" different now?  Yes the stock market is up, but could that be a function of all the funny money pumped into the system since 2008?  Pumping money into the system was in response to the "peaking" of America, the money (inflation) had to go somewhere, we see the "somewhere" currently as the equity markets.

   

In my opinion, the housing market which was used as an ATM machine by so many going into 2007 had to give way (as pricing outstretched the ability to carry) and has only tread water back to earlier levels.  Interest rates have been zeroed out which has allowed stagnant and even lower incomes to carry more debt.  The obvious problem is employment, or the lack of.  Jobs, real and good jobs are simply no longer available and not being generated by creating thin air money.  If the real economy had jobs available, "it" wouldn't feel as bad as it does and the rolling social unrest we have been experiencing might not have happened. 

   

Capital "rolls" from sector to sector, it always has and always will.  Too much "capital" results in a bubble (or bubbles plural).  China's real estate market qualifies as one of these bubbles in the bursting phase .  Their stock market is working on another ... for the ages.  Last week alone China saw over 4 MILLION new brokerage accounts opened, ...while margin debt is escaping the stratosphere!  Chinese bubble mania is no different than any before it (except maybe in scope) and as all before it will eventually burst wide open.  Why does this even matter?  This is important because once it does burst, the money has to go "somewhere".  If you don't believe China has a manic stock market, the following chart shows how many NEW accounts are being opened, is this a mania?



(Bloomberg/Zerohedge)

 

...or this?



My point?  Quite simply I believe logical and obvious ...these Chinese shareholders will soon panic out and look for a new haven, probably a "safe haven".  Hundreds of millions will be looking for a safe place to hide.  Will they "default" (pun intended) and run into U.S. Treasuries?  Jack Lew can hope but I highly doubt it.  Or will they rather choose something more familiar, like gold? 

   

Let me point out the obvious, the Chinese population already has an affinity for gold, this is indisputable.  Ask yourself some very basic mathematical questions, like how many Chinese equity investors are there?  100 million?  200 million?  More?  What kind of balances do they carry in their accounts?  The equivalent of $1,000?  More?  I know you can see where I am going here!  What if 50 or 100 million investors with just $1,000 in their accounts were "panicked" into gold?  Could the market absorb this?  Or would the fractional reserve nature of the gold market be cracked open like a watermelon?  I might remind you, the world produces only 80 million gold ounces per year, where will the metal come from?

   

Before you go off on me and say I am going "pie in the sky", why does this thought process not make sense?  Is my number of possible investors at 50-100 million people too high?  Or the account size too high at $1,000?  And ask yourself this, if there were a bevy of Chinese retail investors to flood the gold market, might the rising price and scarce availability prompt others around the world to do the same?  Do you see?  A burst equity bubble in China has the very real ability break the fractional reserve nature of the West's gold market because the money has nowhere else to go!  Gold is the final destination, a familiar and comfortable one at that for the Chinese.  Everyday Chinese investors can break it by exposing the flaw of miniscule and fractionally reserved inventory.  Please don't tell me "the Chinese will not buy from COMEX nor LBMA" because the demand will find its way to WHEREVER ANY gold is available, and very fast!  What would that do to the "face" of Western finance?  Will the West not then be exposed as a fraud if they can no longer meet demand? 

   

Will China be blamed for blowing the lid off the game?  Did a sovereign country "do it" or did it just happen by a stampede of "uncontrollably panicked" investors?  Could China or Russia or anyone else be blamed for busting the market purposely?  Much pain and loss will occur amongst Chinese speculators, I am sure the leadership of China already knows this.  They also know the money has to go somewhere and the "somewhere" will expose the very heart of Western fraud.  I would think a response of "oops, sorry, but we didn't do it" might be all that is heard!   

 

Regards, 

 

Bill Holter

BILL HOLTER, Associate Writer, Miles Franklin Precious Metal Specialists

Address: 801 Twelve Oaks Center Drive, Suite #834, Wayzata, MN 55391;

Telephone: 800.822.8080, 952.929.7006; Fax: 952.476.7971

E-mail: bholter@milesfranklin.com; Website: www.milesfranklin.com

Prior to joining Miles Franklin in 2012, Bill Holter Worked as a retail stockbroker for 23 years, including 12 as a branch manager at A.G. Edwards.  Later, he left Wall Street to avoid potential liabilities related to management of paper assets.  In 2006 he retired and moved to Costa Rica where he lived until 2011 when he moved back to the United States.  Bill was a well-known contributor to the Gold Anti-Trust Action Committee (GATA) commentaries from 2007-2012.


| Digg This Article
 -- Published: Wednesday, 29 April 2015 | E-Mail  | Print  | Source: GoldSeek.com

comments powered by Disqus



 



Increase Text SizeDecrease Text SizeE-mail Link of Current PagePrinter Friendly PageReturn to GoldSeek.com

 news.goldseek.com >> Story

E-mail Page  | Print  | Disclaimer 


© 1995 - 2017



GoldSeek.com Supports Kiva.org

© GoldSeek.com, Gold Seek LLC

The content on this site is protected by U.S. and international copyright laws and is the property of GoldSeek.com and/or the providers of the content under license. By "content" we mean any information, mode of expression, or other materials and services found on GoldSeek.com. This includes editorials, news, our writings, graphics, and any and all other features found on the site. Please contact us for any further information.

Live GoldSeek Visitor Map | Disclaimer

The views contained here may not represent the views of GoldSeek.com, its affiliates or advertisers. GoldSeek.com makes no representation, warranty or guarantee as to the accuracy or completeness of the information (including news, editorials, prices, statistics, analyses and the like) provided through its service. Any copying, reproduction and/or redistribution of any of the documents, data, content or materials contained on or within this website, without the express written consent of GoldSeek.com, is strictly prohibited. In no event shall GoldSeek.com or its affiliates be liable to any person for any decision made or action taken in reliance upon the information provided herein.