Advertise | Bookmark | Contact Us | E-Mail List |  | Update Page | UraniumSeek.com 

Commentary : Gold Review : Markets : News Wire : Quotes : Silver : Stocks - Main Page 

 GoldSeek.com >> News >> Story  Disclaimer 
 
Latest Headlines

Gold Seeker Closing Report: Gold and Silver Give Back Fridayís Gains
By: Chris Mullen, Gold Seeker Report

Operation Twist By Another Name and Method?
By: Gary Tanashian

SWOT Analysis: Gold Bounced Back After Attempts to Knock Down Price
By: Frank Holmes

Hyperinflation in Zimbabwe Ė Itís back, but maybe not for long
By: JP Koning

Gold Versus Bitcoin: The Pro-Gold Argument Takes Shape
By: John Rubino

Inflation and Counterfeit Credit
By: Keith Weiner

Gold's Interesting Day
By: Rick Ackerman

Two Scenarios, One Strategy
By: Gary Savage

Zinc One Files a Technical Report on Scotia Property
By: Zinc One Resources Inc.

Money and Markets Infographic Shows Silver Most Undervalued Asset
By: GoldCore

 
Search

GoldSeek Web

 
The 10th Man: Trading 201: Position Sizing


 -- Published: Thursday, 17 September 2015 | Print  | Disqus 

By Jared Dillian 

This is going to be the last of the trading lessons for a while. I donít want to turn this into a trading blog, and there are important macro things to talk about (especially next week).

Hereís an imaginary scenario: someone tips you that an acquisition is going to happen. Of course, that would be insider trading, which is illegalóbut letís pretend for the purpose of this exercise that insider trading were legal.

So someone tells you that Company A is going to buy Company B and is going to pay a 100% premium.

Question: how much of your money do you put in Company B?

If the answer is anything less than ďAll of it,Ē then you are an idiot.

We are talking about a 100% return in one day. Can you do better than that? No.

Also, assume that the guy who told you this is 100% reliable. The information is legit. There is no chance that itís wrong.

Rationally, you should put every penny of your money into Company B stock. If you put in any less than 100%, you are behaving irrationally.

Got it?

Scenario 2: you have a vague idea that GE is going to go up. Just a hunch.

How much GE should you buy?

Answer: not very much. Maybe it should be the smallest position in your portfolio.

At this point in the story, think about your portfolio, or maybe even log into it.

My guess is you have some very high-conviction ideas alongside some very low-conviction ideas, and that everything is just about weighted equally.

People do this all the time. They have $100,000 in 10 stocksó$10,000 a stockóregardless of conviction level.

This is going to be hard for novice traders to understand. Novice traders pick stocks like I bet on baseball. I might bet against the Royals because Edinson Volquez wears his hat sideways, or I might bet on the Nationals because I am a huge Bryce Harper fan, or I might bet against the Red Sox just because.

Novice traders find it hard to believe that someone can be that sure about a stock. But I meet professional gamblers who are ďthat sureĒ about baseball games. I donít understand how they do it, but they do it.

Soros and Druckenmiller were pretty gosh darn sure when they bet against the British pound. Imagine if they had been wrong!

But they knew they wouldnít be.

Winner, Winner, Chicken Dinner

Letís go back to about 10 years ago when Ben Mezrich wrote Bringing Down The House: The Inside Story of Six MIT Students Who Took Vegas for Millions. That was when the general public got to learn about advantage play in blackjack, that is, counting cards.

How does it work?

In one paragraph, you count cards so you can keep track of face cards (which are good) and low cards (which are bad), so if you know thereís a concentration of face cards left in the shoe, you will have a temporary statistical advantage over the dealer.

And how do you take advantage of that statistical advantage?

Duh, you bet more!

Thatís what the card counters in the book did. When the count was high, they were putting in 10, 20, or even 50 times their normal bet.

In fact, thatís how most casinos know theyíre dealing with a card counter. Average players donít vary their bet size. They bet the same size all the time.

Average traders do too.

If you want to read more on this concept (and I highly recommend that you do), read David Sklanskyís Getting the Best of It.  Itís a gambling book, but most people I know on Wall Street have read it.

Oink

So Iím going to preach what I practice. My highest-conviction position is about 80% of my portfolio (using leverage).

Now, thatís varying your bet size.

Most of my ideas are actually bad. Seriously. I knew a guy at Lehman who said he was wrong 80% of the time. I figured he was lying. The guy made a ton of dough. How could that be true?

If you bet the farm on the 20% of the time you are right, you can do very well.

This, I think, is one of the limitations of an investment newsletter. You have these ideas, and they are in a portfolio, but they are not weighted. Some are clearly better than others. And there they all are, line items in the portfolio update, and the good ones look the same as the bad ones.

A word of caution. Novice traders should not, absolutely not, make one position 80% of their portfolio. I do it because I have 16 years of experience. You should not do this any more than you would bet 80% of your money on a baseball game (unless you know a lot about baseball). Novice traders canít vary their bet size because they donít know enough to tell which ideas are bad and which ones are a ďsure thing.Ē

Itís a good way to blow yourself up.

But at some point in your investing career, you are going to come across one of those really great ideas, and you will be tempted to weight it as 10% of your portfolio, along with everything else.

Diversification!

Screw diversification.

How do billionaires get to be billionaires? Funny, if you look at a list of billionaires, thereís not too many money managers in there. Some. Like Dalio, Tepper, Soros, Jones. But not many.

Most billionaires got to be billionaires by starting companies and growing them.

In other words, they had 100% of their portfolio in one stock. Their own.

You donít get to be a billionaire by putting $10,000 in 10 stocks.

We all canít be billionaires. But you donít have to be a piker.

Jared Dillian
Jared Dillian

If you enjoyed Jared's article, you can sign up for The 10th Man, a free weekly letter, at mauldineconomics.com. Follow Jared on Twitter @dailydirtnap

The article The 10th Man: Trading 201: Position Sizing was originally published at mauldineconomics.com.

| Digg This Article
 -- Published: Thursday, 17 September 2015 | E-Mail  | Print  | Source: GoldSeek.com

comments powered by Disqus



 



Increase Text SizeDecrease Text SizeE-mail Link of Current PagePrinter Friendly PageReturn to GoldSeek.com

 news.goldseek.com >> Story

E-mail Page  | Print  | Disclaimer 


© 1995 - 2017



GoldSeek.com Supports Kiva.org

© GoldSeek.com, Gold Seek LLC

The content on this site is protected by U.S. and international copyright laws and is the property of GoldSeek.com and/or the providers of the content under license. By "content" we mean any information, mode of expression, or other materials and services found on GoldSeek.com. This includes editorials, news, our writings, graphics, and any and all other features found on the site. Please contact us for any further information.

Live GoldSeek Visitor Map | Disclaimer

The views contained here may not represent the views of GoldSeek.com, its affiliates or advertisers. GoldSeek.com makes no representation, warranty or guarantee as to the accuracy or completeness of the information (including news, editorials, prices, statistics, analyses and the like) provided through its service. Any copying, reproduction and/or redistribution of any of the documents, data, content or materials contained on or within this website, without the express written consent of GoldSeek.com, is strictly prohibited. In no event shall GoldSeek.com or its affiliates be liable to any person for any decision made or action taken in reliance upon the information provided herein.