LIVE Gold Prices $  | E-Mail Subscriptions | Update GoldSeek | GoldSeek Radio 

Commentary : Gold Review : Markets : News Wire : Quotes : Silver : Stocks - Main Page >> News >> Story  Disclaimer 
Latest Headlines

Trump vs. Biden: What’s at Stake for Metals Investors?
By: Stefan Gleason

Gold Stock Profits: A Horn Of Plenty
By: Stewart Thomson

Gold SWOT: Record Levels of Platinum Buying by Retail Investors
By: Frank Holmes

When Is a Capital Gain Capital Consumption?
By: Keith Weiner, Monetary Metals

Holiday Weekend More Spectating than Spending
By: Rick Ackerman, Rick's Picks

MCX (India) Silver Long Term Price Forecast
By: Chintan Karnani, Insignia Consultants

Gold Seeker Report: This Week in Mining Issue #14: A Quiet Week on the Mining Front
By: Chris Marchese, Chief Mining Analyst at

Getting Positioned for the Worst Depression in the History of the World...
By: Clive Maund

Precious Metals Hit Resistance
By: Jordan Roy-Byrne

COT Gold, Silver and US Dollar Index Report - May 22, 2020


GoldSeek Web

Look No Further Than International Trade!

 -- Published: Thursday, 24 September 2015 | Print  | Disqus 

By Bill Holter

  Last week the clock ran out on the Fed's latest bluff.  They have gone 55 meetings over 80 months without a single tightening or rise in interest rates.  Last week was supposed to be "different" and a tightening of credit was predicted by something like 82% of economists polled.  We of course now know that no tightening occurred and a trial balloon was even floated about instituting a new round of QE...

  This of course was an easy one to call.  Look at what the markets have done since that meeting, how much worse would it be had the Fed actually raised rates?  Look all around the world and especially at China beginning to unwind, do they need a tightening of credit?  They just devalued the yuan again yesterday (without any mysterious plant explosions ...yet), had the Fed tightened you must ask yourself how much bigger the devaluation would have been by market forces?
  Leading into last week, I think the easiest way to know that credit did not need to be tightened was by looking at international trade.  This is one area where the "numbers are the numbers" and are not massaged (annihilated) by government reporters (not to mention mainstream reporters!).  You see, the trade numbers pretty much need to match up and the freight rates are extremely hard to hide.  Pretty much, they are what they are and if lied about are too easy to debunk.  Last week, Zerohedge wrote on this topic when they penned - WTO's Stark Warning On Global Trade: "The Timing Belt On The Global Growth Engine Is Off".

  Further, if you look below at the Baltic Dry index, do you see a "recovery" from 2008 or a dead cat bounce which is now waning?  THIS is indicative of global GDP, anything different from individual countries is an outlier and must be seriously questioned (including China).


  But why is this even important?  First, because it is the REAL PICTURE but more importantly it is a very strong clue to actual rather than "made up" GDP.  Spelled out for you, GDP is not growing enough (or at all) to create and bring new capital into the system.  "The system" being one which has far more debt than it did during the 2007-09 event.  Do you see where I am going with this?  Clearly not enough growth exists globally to create the new capital necessary ...yes that's carry a much larger debt load than we had back then! 

  Maybe it would be a good thing to remind you, one of the big problems back in 2008 was "too much debt".  Not only did the world not "liquidate" debt, it has taken on much more with an underlying economy that has been weakening for several years. 

  Going back to the top and full turn, how could the Fed have tightened last week?  Or better, how can they ever tighten?  The next move will be further additions of liquidity least as long as markets are open to do the "add".  Of course, just pulling the plug on the computers is another option!

Standing watch,

Bill Holter for;

Holter/Sinclair collaboration.

Bill Holter writes and is partnered with Jim Sinclair at the newly formed Holter/Sinclair collaboration.

Prior, he wrote for Miles Franklin from 2012-15. Bill worked as a retail stockbroker for 23 years, including 12 as a branch manager at A.G. Edwards. He left Wall Street in late 2006 to avoid potential liabilities related to management of paper assets. In retirement he and his family moved to Costa Rica where he lived until 2011 when he moved back to the United States. Bill was a well-known contributor to the Gold Anti-Trust Action Committee (GATA) commentaries from 2007-present.

| Digg This Article
 -- Published: Thursday, 24 September 2015 | E-Mail  | Print  | Source:

comments powered by Disqus


Increase Text SizeDecrease Text SizeE-mail Link of Current PagePrinter Friendly PageReturn to >> Story

E-mail Page  | Print  | Disclaimer 

© 1995 - 2019 Supports

©, Gold Seek LLC

The content on this site is protected by U.S. and international copyright laws and is the property of and/or the providers of the content under license. By "content" we mean any information, mode of expression, or other materials and services found on This includes editorials, news, our writings, graphics, and any and all other features found on the site. Please contact us for any further information.

Live GoldSeek Visitor Map | Disclaimer


The views contained here may not represent the views of, Gold Seek LLC, its affiliates or advertisers., Gold Seek LLC makes no representation, warranty or guarantee as to the accuracy or completeness of the information (including news, editorials, prices, statistics, analyses and the like) provided through its service. Any copying, reproduction and/or redistribution of any of the documents, data, content or materials contained on or within this website, without the express written consent of, Gold Seek LLC, is strictly prohibited. In no event shall, Gold Seek LLC or its affiliates be liable to any person for any decision made or action taken in reliance upon the information provided herein.