-- Published: Tuesday, 10 November 2015 | Print | Disqus
By Jeff Thomas
In the early 2000’s, there were those economists and investors who believed that the US was headed for an economic fall – that the repeal of the Glass Steagall Act in 1999 would allow the financial institutions to enter into widespread reckless loan practices that would lead to a housing crash. And that that crash would lead to a stock market crash that would herald in The Great Unravelling – The Greater Depression.
Most of us who made these predictions hypothesized that the initial collapse would be significant, but not severe – that the governments of the world would come to the rescue with bail-out programmes that would stave off the symptoms of the problem, but would do nothing to cure the disease itself – that of massive debt.
We suggested that there would be a false recovery, resulting in the easing of symptoms. There would be repeated claims by both governments and the media that “recovery is nigh.” However, underneath all the folderol, the disease would worsen considerably, eventually reaching the point at which the patient (the economy) could not be saved. At some point, public confidence in the leaders’ abilities to resuscitate the body would fade. This would be triggered by some event or events, such as a crash in the stock or bond market, a dumping of debt back into the US by creditor nations, debt default by Greece or some other nation, commodity price spikes, backlash from sanctioned nations, the imposition of protective tariffs – any one of a dozen possible triggers would do the trick. From that point on, each of the other triggers would eventually occur, as toppling dominoes, fulfilling the prediction of Depression.
Only in this latter period would the dreaded “D-word” be acknowledged by the governments and media.
Most prognosticators (myself included) went on the general assumption that the initial collapse would last two to three years and that the following “suspension” period of bailouts and other attempts to paper-over the problem might last another three years or so. During this period, conditions would not be good, but they would be better than the conditions during the initial crash and far better than the conditions that would follow the suspension period. Not surprisingly many of us came to refer to this period as “the eye of the hurricane,” an apt term, as, the eye of a hurricane is a period of relative calm after the first onslaught of the storm and just prior to the inevitable and often more devastating second half.
The second half of the economic storm will prove to be far more devastating than the first, since the fact that its onset will mean that the governments of the world have already thrown everything they have at the problem and will be out of ammunition in the second half.
In a sense, we could suggest that governments have done a good job in staving off the inevitable, since the eye of the hurricane has lasted more than five years (longer than most of us had expected). Unfortunately, the level of debt created in the attempt to postpone the inevitable assured that every month of postponement meant that the eventual crash would be that much worse, and that the recovery would be that much more prolonged.
But, if the assumption is correct that there will be a second, more devastating half of the storm, when will it be? Well, an actual date would be impossible to predict with accuracy, but we can look at the possible triggers and ask ourselves if we’re getting closer. Recently, we’ve observed a very near miss on debt default by Greece. We’ve witnessed a crash in the Chinese stock market, coupled with several downgradings of the yuan, causing a significant drop in the US stock market. Further, although it hasn’t received the media attention is should receive, China has been dumping US treasuries back into the US in a significant way. One prominent candidate in the US presidential elections is calling for the imposition of protective tariffs and has received cheers from voters for his “courageous” position. (The reader might study the Smoot-Hawley Tariff of 1930 if he is uncertain of just how disastrous protective tariffs can prove to be.)
Readers of this column will already be aware of what may be heading their way, economically, politically and socially, as we once again enter the hurricane. (Others may check the International Man archive to learn more.)
In past generations, when folks observed warning signs of an approaching storm, they would often ask Grandpa if his rheumatism was giving him trouble, as any dramatic change in barometer pressure is both an irritation to rheumatism and a warning of dramatic change in weather.
Today, in questioning whether we’re reaching the far side of the hurricane, we might do much the same. There are a number of old-timers out there who have tracked economic trends for decades. Those who have developed a reputation for successful prediction tend to go as much by “feel” as by analysis.
For several months, in communicating with the economic “Grandpa’s” around the world, the reaction I’ve received from them has been as though they’re all sitting on the same porch together, in their rockers. Every one of them is saying the same thing – “It’s really beginning to ‘ feel’ close. The first major event could happen anytime now.”
But, rather than be alarmist, it can also be said that the magicians who run the world’s governments may yet come up with another delay or two. The question for the reader is whether he wishes to put off dealing with the coming hurricane until it’s on his doorstep or whether he’d rather be prepared when the time comes. As it is, the palm fronds are blowing and Grandpa’s joints are getting stiff.
This might be a good time to get the lawn furniture in and to close up the shutters.
For those who wish to be the least impacted by the hurricane, this would be the time to (if possible) prepare an overseas bolthole, move funds away from any jurisdiction that’s likely to confiscate or impose capital controls, move investments out of stocks and bonds and into real estate in a jurisdiction that’s at lesser risk, and into precious metals – to be stored in a jurisdiction where the government has a reputation for low taxation and non-invasiveness into private wealth.
The coming storm promises to be the largest of our lifetime. We shall all be affected by it. A few will profit from it. Some will be mildly negatively impacted; most will be hit hard, due to being unprepared.
Those who choose to distance themselves (and their wealth – however large or small) geographically from the centre of the hurricane will fare best.
Jeff is British and resides in the Caribbean. The son of an economist and historian, he learned early to be distrustful of governments as a general principle. Although he spent his career creating and developing businesses, for eight years, he penned a weekly newspaper column on the theme of limiting government.
He began his study of economics around 1990, learning initially from Sir John Templeton, then Harry Schulz and Doug Casey and later others of an Austrian persuasion. He is now a regular feature writer for Casey Research’s International Man.
| Digg This Article
-- Published: Tuesday, 10 November 2015 | E-Mail | Print | Source: GoldSeek.com