Advertise | Bookmark | Contact Us | E-Mail List |  | Update Page | 

Commentary : Gold Review : Markets : News Wire : Quotes : Silver : Stocks - Main Page >> News >> Story  Disclaimer 
Latest Headlines

Gold Seeker Weekly Wrap-Up: Gold and Silver Find Modest Gains on the Week
By: Chris Mullen, Gold Seeker Report

Gerald Celente: Fed May Bring Down the Economy, Crash Markets
By: Mike Gleason

COT Gold, Silver and US Dollar Index Report - September 21, 2018

GATA appeals to the new Shareholders Gold Council
By: Chris Powell

A Constructive Suggestion
By: Theodore Butler

Gold Exodus to Reverse
By: Adam Hamilton, CPA

Signals for the Coming Crash in Stocks and Rally in Gold
By: David Brady, CFA

Trade War vs. Commodities
By: Louis James

GATA asks CFTC if market rigging by U.S. govt. is legal
By: Chris Powell

Is This Time Really Different? Fed Tightening and Gold
By: Arkadiusz Sieron


GoldSeek Web

Will NIRP Cause a Systemic Event?

 -- Published: Monday, 2 May 2016 | Print  | Disqus 

By Graham Summers


Are Central Bankers delusional?


Over the weekend, Benot Cur, Member of the Executive Board of the ECB, penned a piece defending the ECBs policies from the criticism that NIRP hurts savers.


The first paragraph reveals, quite clearly, just how lost the ECB is regarding the efficacy of its policies.


Is the ECB stubborn because we are adhering to our monetary policy despite strong criticism? No. We are complying with a precise task that was conferred on us. The EU treaties gave the ECB a narrow price stability mandate. In 2003 the ECBs Governing Council clarified that euro area inflation should be below, but close to, 2% over the medium term.


If this is the alleged mandate for the ECB, they might want to reconsider their current policies. As we noted over the weekend, four rounds of NIRP as well as over 600 billion in QE has yet to even achieve 0% inflation.


NIRP and QE began post-2013 after the EU banking crisis hit full force in 2012. Looking at the above chart, where can you see any significant uptick in inflation from the EBCs policies?


The single largest move, trough to peak, occurred from January 2015 to May 2015 when inflation rose from -0.6% to 0.3%, or a move of 0.9%. This occurred when the ECB announced its first QE program in history.


So implementing a 1 trillion QE program, which for years was considered the nuclear option for the EU, produced a 0.9% increase in inflation that lasted a total of five months.


This is the greatest success the EU has managed to achieve despite implementing some of the most extraordinary monetary policies in history a less than 1% increase in inflation that lasted less than half of a year.


Meanwhile, the ECB has implemented four rounds of NIRP, which does in fact hurt savers a great deal. In simple terms, while the ECB pursues its monetary pipe dream based on hypotheticals (economic models imply inflation should rise based on NIRP), it ignores economic realities.


What are those realities?


NIRP is not inflationary. On the contrary it is highly DE-flationary.


As Mr. Couere himself notes in his op-ed piece people are not only savers. The problem with this statement, is that while emphasizing people are more than economic units, he fails to see how actual people react psychologically to the ECBs policies.


NIRP is both a tax on future interest income as well as a tax on current capital. It is a terrifying prospect for anyone as it indicates that you are very likely going to lose money.


Basic human psychology reveals that people are more afraid of losing what they already have, that they are of gaining something they dont have. NIRP guarantees the former.


The likelihood of anyone experiencing NIRP and believing that the solution is to pile into risk assets (where the possibility of even greater losses of capital are plentiful) is less than 1%.


This is particularly true when most EU stocks peaked in 2014 around the time the EBC first introduced NIRP.


EU stocks are not a safe bet post-NIRP. And why would any saver buy EU sovereign bonds when most have negative yields? If your deposits are already going to be charged based on NIRP, buying an EU sovereign bond which also charges your interest accomplishes nothing but increasing your volatility.


Who would want that?


At the end of the day, the ECB, like all Central Banks, is concerned with one thing: the bond bubble.


And with the EU sporting a Debt to GDP ration of over 90% as a whole, the EU itself is bankrupt. Four rounds of NIRP and 1 trillion in QE cant fix this.


Eventually this will trigger another 2008 type event. When, no one can say, but given that the ECB has failed to generate significant inflation, and that most EU nations have seen their Debt to GDP ratios increase since 2012, its not far off.


The next Crisis is just around the corner. And it will make 2012 look like a joke.


Best Regards

Phoenix Capital Research



| Digg This Article
 -- Published: Monday, 2 May 2016 | E-Mail  | Print  | Source:

comments powered by Disqus


Increase Text SizeDecrease Text SizeE-mail Link of Current PagePrinter Friendly PageReturn to >> Story

E-mail Page  | Print  | Disclaimer 

© 1995 - 2018 Supports

©, Gold Seek LLC

The content on this site is protected by U.S. and international copyright laws and is the property of and/or the providers of the content under license. By "content" we mean any information, mode of expression, or other materials and services found on This includes editorials, news, our writings, graphics, and any and all other features found on the site. Please contact us for any further information.

Live GoldSeek Visitor Map | Disclaimer

The views contained here may not represent the views of, its affiliates or advertisers. makes no representation, warranty or guarantee as to the accuracy or completeness of the information (including news, editorials, prices, statistics, analyses and the like) provided through its service. Any copying, reproduction and/or redistribution of any of the documents, data, content or materials contained on or within this website, without the express written consent of, is strictly prohibited. In no event shall or its affiliates be liable to any person for any decision made or action taken in reliance upon the information provided herein.