-- Published: Sunday, 27 November 2016 | Print | Disqus
Source: Adrian Day for The Gold Report
The market reaction to Trump's election victory—stocks and the dollar up, gold down—was the opposite of what had been widely foreseen. Money manager Adrian Day takes a look into what happened and why, and discusses the outlook going forward.
At the core of the market reaction are interest rates. Bonds declined sharply on the Trump victory. They had already been falling for the last several months, and the growing conviction of a rate increase in December stepped up the decline. Trump, with his grandiose spending and debt plans, only exacerbated that decline.
But that made U.S. yields attractive (relatively) to foreign investors, and yield overrode the negative sentiment globally towards Trump. Thus, foreign investors bought U.S. bonds, which drove the dollar up, and pushed gold down (aggravated by massive sales by well-known investors including George Soros, Carl Icahn and Stanley Druckenmiller.
A general distrust turns to specific positives
As for stocks, there had been a general negative attitude toward Trump, and somewhat positive toward Clinton, in the period leading up to the election, as evidenced by market moves after each debate, FBI statement and new poll. When it looked as though Trump might win, Asian stock markets duly sunk, along with Dow futures.
But once Trump was declared the winner in the middle of the night, the general shifted to the specific, and investors started looking at sectors that would be gainers and losers from a Trump presidency. And off of a sudden, there were more stocks that were winners that losers, led by banks and the financial sector (less regulation), base metals (infrastructure spending), oil drilling and drug companies. Given that these sectors had been depressed on fears of greater regulation under Clinton, the rebounds were sharp.
Likely outcomes in the period ahead
All of these moves are likely overdone in the immediate term. But if we look at a Trump administration, we will likely see:
- Increased spending, including on infrastructure and defense
- Tax cuts and less regulation
- Higher interest rates
- All in the context of continued easy money globally
This suggests a stronger dollar in the near term.
With regard to Yellen's threat for a more "hawkish" Fed to counterbalance fiscal profligacy, we would retort, "I knew Paul Volker, and she's no Paul Volker." We do not expect sharply higher rates, and further out we will likely see higher U.S. debt (already high) and higher inflation (already stirring).
So the outlook a little further out—combined with easy money around the world, stronger Indian demand, possible geopolitical turmoil, and a decline in mine production—will be a higher gold price.
The question for us is, at what point does the near term turn into the further out. We will likely see a stronger dollar (and lower gold) heading into the rate hike, but that could well prove a turning point, as it did last December. We would also add that the withdrawals from gold ETFs are probably overdone, while stock valuations, among both miners and exploration companies, are very favorable.
Adrian Day, London-born and a graduate of the London School of Economics, heads the money management firm Adrian Day Asset Management, where he manages discretionary accounts in both global and resource areas. Day is also sub-adviser to the EuroPacific Gold Fund (EPGFX). His latest book is "Investing in Resources: How to Profit from the Outsized Potential and Avoid the Risks."
Disclosure:
1) Adrian Day: I, or members of my immediate household or family, own shares of the following companies mentioned in this article: Nestle SA, Franco-Nevada Corp. and Lara Exploration Ltd. I personally am, or members of my immediate household or family are, paid by the following companies mentioned in this article: None. My company has a financial relationship with the following companies mentioned in this article: None. Funds controlled by Adrian Day Asset Management hold shares of the following companies mentioned in this article: All of the companies mentioned. I determined which companies would be included in this article based on my research and understanding of the sector.
2) The following companies mentioned in this article are sponsors of Streetwise Reports: None. The companies mentioned in this article were not involved in any aspect of the article preparation. Streetwise Reports does not accept stock in exchange for its services. The information provided above is for informational purposes only and is not a recommendation to buy or sell any security.
3) Statements and opinions expressed are the opinions of the author and not of Streetwise Reports or its officers. The author is wholly responsible for the validity of the statements. The author was not paid by Streetwise Reports for this article. Streetwise Reports was not paid by the author to publish or syndicate this article.
4) This article does not constitute investment advice. Each reader is encouraged to consult with his or her individual financial professional and any action a reader takes as a result of information presented here is his or her own responsibility. By opening this page, each reader accepts and agrees to Streetwise Reports' terms of use and full legal disclaimer. This article is not a solicitation for investment. Streetwise Reports does not render general or specific investment advice and the information on Streetwise Reports should not be considered a recommendation to buy or sell any security. Streetwise Reports does not endorse or recommend the business, products, services or securities of any company mentioned on Streetwise Reports.
5) From time to time, Streetwise Reports LLC and its directors, officers, employees or members of their families, as well as persons interviewed for articles and interviews on the site, may have a long or short position in securities mentioned. Directors, officers, employees or members of their families are prohibited from making purchases and/or sales of those securities in the open market or otherwise during the up-to-four-week interval from the time of the interview/article until after it publishes.
| Digg This Article
-- Published: Sunday, 27 November 2016 | E-Mail | Print | Source: GoldSeek.com
