Advertise | Bookmark | Contact Us | E-Mail List |  | Update Page | UraniumSeek.com 

Commentary : Gold Review : Markets : News Wire : Quotes : Silver : Stocks - Main Page 

 GoldSeek.com >> News >> Story  Disclaimer 
 
Latest Headlines

Gold Seeker Weekly Wrap-Up: Gold and Silver Fall Almost 1% and 2% on the Week
By: Chris Mullen, Gold Seeker Report

COT Gold, Silver and US Dollar Index Report - July 20, 2018
By: GoldSeek.com

The Deep State, Trump, and the World
By: Clive Maund

Gold Investment Wanes
By: Adam Hamilton, CPA

The Most Important Charts for Your Gold Stocks Right Now
By: Marin Katusa

The road to war: China’s kryptonite - Part 2
By: Richard (Rick) Mills

GoldSeek Radio Nugget: Bill Murphy and Chris Waltzek
By: radio.GoldSeek.com

NEVER BEFORE SEEN CHARTS: Gold Mining Industry’s Costs Are Higher Than Market Realizes
By: Steve St. Angelo

Powell Sinks Gold, Again
By: Arkadiusz Sieron

Weekly Digest – News, Market Updates and Videos You May Have Missed
By: GoldCore

 
Search

GoldSeek Web

 
Trade Wars Are Really Good For The Stock Market


 -- Published: Monday, 9 July 2018 | Print  | Disqus 

By Avi Gilburt

If you read most of the analysis being published over the last two days, you would almost assume that the S&P500 should be crashing or be in a bear market. Yet, we are only 4% off the all-time highs struck early this year in the S&P, whereas the Nasdaq and Russell have made new higher highs this summer.

In fact, if you had read the analysis put out over the last two days when further tariffs went into effect, you would have to assume that Friday should have been a major down day in the US markets. This is just an excerpt from a bearish author’s recent article on the US market:

“Virtually all of the market headlines this week centered around the Friday imposition of tariffs by the U.S. on $34 billion in Chinese goods and the immediate reciprocation from Beijing. The duties kicked in at one minute after midnight and marked the most serious escalation yet in the burgeoning global trade war.”

In total, this past Friday saw further tariffs that affect a combined 100 billion worth of trade between the world's two largest economies. So, what did the stock market do on Friday? We rallied 1%.

I was sitting at my computer screen chuckling on Friday. If you would apply the analysis we see so often about the news of the day “causing” what happened in the stock market, then we should have seen many articles entitled “Escalation Of Trade Wars Caused Market To Rally.” Yet, have any of you seen such articles? I sure have not.

Therein lies the intellectual dishonesty of most of what you read about financial markets. I can assure you that if Friday was a 1% down day, every article would have laid blame to the trade wars escalation as the clear cause of the down day on Friday. But, when the market action does not match the headlines, what do we see in the narrative of the day? Silence.

Folks, markets go up and down. This is simply a fact. They are non-linear in nature, and there are always periods of progression and regression. To use the news or other similar perspectives to assign exogenous reasons as to why the market did what it did is an exercise in futility, and will often leave you scratching your head on days like Friday. And, those that commonly assign exogenous reasons as to why the market does what it does are noticeably absent from the discussion on days like Friday.

I am sure many of you are now thinking to yourselves, “come on, Avi. The market clearly reacted to the good news in the jobs report.” Yet, you would be missing the point. On any given day, you can almost always find good news about the market and bad news about the market. So, is it really helpful to anyone to point to any news which simply coincides with the market action of the day? I think not.

So, with the US stock market rallying 1% on a day when we experienced a serious escalation of a worldwide trade war, I have presented to you an intellectually honest article title above (smile). At some point, I hope many of you discard your simplistic perspectives about the market, no matter how well wrapped they may be in colorful articles and well “reasoned” opinions. To put it simply, you must begin to understand that markets are driven by mass sentiment, and not by perceived exogenous events.

If you would like to understand this perspective a bit better, the feel free to read just a couple of the articles I have written on this topic:

For those that want an even more detailed explanation of this perspective, with significant historical support, I strongly suggest and highly recommend Robert Prechter’s recent book entitled The Socionomic Theory of Finance. It will open your eyes as to what truly drives financial markets.

As far as the coming week, support is now at 2730-35SPX. As long as we remain over that support, I am looking for the market to continue to attack the 2800SPX region next.

Moreover, the next major test for this market will likely come in August. Once this current rally completes in the coming weeks, the depth of the pullback I expect to see later this summer will tell us several very important things about the market. First, the depth of the pullback will allow us to project how high over 3000 the market will rally before we top out. And, second, the depth of the pullback will tell us when the market will top out.

For those that may not remember, I am looking for a 20-30% correction to begin once the market completes this phase of its long-term rally over 3000SPX. That will likely begin in 2019, (and maybe even as early as the end of 2018, depending on what happens in August).

Lastly, I am quite certain that someone will be posting a snide comment below about our analysis methodology and how “squiggly lines cannot predict the market.” Well, considering how well we have been able to predict this market over the last number of years despite all the bearish fundamentals you have read about which were supposed to have crashed this market long ago (Brexit, Frexit, Grexit, rise in interest rates, cessation of QE, terrorist attacks, Crimea, Trump, Syrian missile attack, North Korea, record hurricane damage in Houston, Florida, and Puerto Rico, trade wars, etc.), I would say that those “squiggly lines” certainly have the much better track record.

See charts illustrating the wave counts on the S&P 500.

Avi Gilburt is a widely followed Elliott Wave technical analyst and founder of ElliottWaveTrader.net (www.elliottwavetrader.net), a live Trading Room featuring his intraday market analysis (including emini S&P 500, metals, oil, USD & VXX), interactive member-analyst forum, and detailed library of Elliott Wave education.

 


| Digg This Article
 -- Published: Monday, 9 July 2018 | E-Mail  | Print  | Source: GoldSeek.com

comments powered by Disqus



 



Increase Text SizeDecrease Text SizeE-mail Link of Current PagePrinter Friendly PageReturn to GoldSeek.com

 news.goldseek.com >> Story

E-mail Page  | Print  | Disclaimer 


© 1995 - 2018



GoldSeek.com Supports Kiva.org

© GoldSeek.com, Gold Seek LLC

The content on this site is protected by U.S. and international copyright laws and is the property of GoldSeek.com and/or the providers of the content under license. By "content" we mean any information, mode of expression, or other materials and services found on GoldSeek.com. This includes editorials, news, our writings, graphics, and any and all other features found on the site. Please contact us for any further information.

Live GoldSeek Visitor Map | Disclaimer

The views contained here may not represent the views of GoldSeek.com, its affiliates or advertisers. GoldSeek.com makes no representation, warranty or guarantee as to the accuracy or completeness of the information (including news, editorials, prices, statistics, analyses and the like) provided through its service. Any copying, reproduction and/or redistribution of any of the documents, data, content or materials contained on or within this website, without the express written consent of GoldSeek.com, is strictly prohibited. In no event shall GoldSeek.com or its affiliates be liable to any person for any decision made or action taken in reliance upon the information provided herein.