-- Published: Tuesday, 28 August 2018 | Print | Disqus
Source: Matt Geiger for Streetwise Reports 08/27/2018
Fund manager Matt Geiger of MJG Capital expresses his view of the current resources market. -->
After a screaming January to start 2018, it's been six consecutive months of pain across the mining industry. The catalyst for this has largely been fear that the Trump tariff tantrum will derail global GDP growth, coupled with fears that the U.S. dollar is set to continue its seven-year bull market and stifle raw material demand from emerging economies. The pain has been particularly acute over the past few months, leading many industry observers to question whether we have plunged into a new mining bear market.
This is not an unreasonable question. After all, the TSXV is off 28% since reaching a multi-year high in January as seen in the chart below. (Any drop of greater than 20% is generally considered bear market territory.) Just two weeks ago, money managed short positions in copper hit a new all-time high. It's a similar story for gold where in early July speculators went net-short the metal for the first time in two years.
The anecdotal evidence is out there as well. In mid-July, the widely followed resource investor Marin Katusa blasted an email to his mailing list announcing that he was "cashing up" and expecting resource stocks to drop to significantly lower levels over the rest of 2018. Not long thereafter, Vanguard announced that its $2.3 billion Vanguard Precious Metals and Mining Fund (VGPMX) was being be renamed to Vanguard Global Capital Cycles Fund and broadening its investment mandate beyond mining. This is exactly the type of behavior that you expect to see in bear markets.
In light of these negative developments, it's clear that we're in another mining bear market right? Not so fast. My read is that we are NOT in another bear market and this instead should be viewed as a consolidation period within the mining bull market that began in early 2016. This view stems from a couple of factors.
The first is that, by historical standards, the bull market that began in January 2016 would have been abnormally short and weak if it indeed ended this past January. As pointed out recently by newsletter writer Gwen Preston, the average junior mining bull market has "averaged 47 months with a 202% gain. . .If this [bull] market indeed ended in January (the last high), it would have been the shortest (25 months) and the weakest (73%) in four decades."
This in and of itself is of course not conclusive evidence that this bull market is still ongoing. It is indeed possible that a decade from now we'll look back on the two-year period between January 2016 and January 2018 as the shortest resource bull market of the past 50 years.
However, it is my belief that markets generally adhere to Newton's Third Law: For every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction. This is particularly true for mining, which, like shipping, is abnormally cyclical due to the capital-intensive nature of the business. It is said that bear markets are the authors of the following bull market. And we generally find that the more ugly the bear, the more attractive the bull.
With this principle in mind, it seems unlikely to me that the most severe bear market in a generation (2011–2015) would be followed by the shortest and weakest bull market in four decades. This suggests to me that at least one more dramatic up leg is still forthcoming before we see the next bear.
The second and more persuasive piece of evidence that this bull market is ongoing is that the senior miners continue to deploy capital into junior developers and explorers at a healthy clip. There is the recent M&A activity surrounding Arizona Mining, Nevsun, Novagold, Peregrine and Northern Empire. We're also seeing an increased appetite for strategic investments into earlier stage juniors. Big boys South 32, Newcrest and Goldcorp have been particularly active on this front.
This is sustainable, at least for the next few years. The senior miners of both base and precious metals have markedly healthier balance sheets than they did just a few years ago. They also have the desperate need to replenish their project pipeline, after years of divestments and minimal development spending through the 2011–2015 mining bear market. More deals are coming, and soon.
For these reasons, I view this current market weakness as consolidation before the next leg up and NOT a prolonged bear market. However at this point you may be thinking:
I don't care whether this is technically a correction or a bear market. These are just semantics. I'm losing money and I'm tired of it. When will things start going up again? And when they do start going up, how long will the good times last?
We'll take these one at a time. There are a few potential catalysts in the coming months with the potential to reverse the weakness we've seen in metals and in particular juniors.
While this may be viewed as overly simplistic to some, it may take something as obvious as traders and fund managers getting back to their desks after the summer holiday. Up until the past couple of weeks, it was a particularly slow summer with low trading volume and investor interest. Given that historically precious metals perform exceptionally well in September (see chart below), it may take a simple change of season to draw attention back to the metals complex. The aforementioned newsletter writer Gwen Preston is one proponent of this view. We'll learn shortly whether this year is different.
Another possibility is that, after spending the last six months worried about deflation, we could see the market come to the realization that if anything the China-U.S. trade spat is inflationary and does not have the potential to seriously undermine global GDP. As noted by Sprott's Shree Kargutkar: "The U.S. currently trades approximately $2.3 trillion worth of goods with the world and the portion of goods affected by import tariffs is estimated to be $92 billion, or a mere 4%."
4% is inconsequential. The real risk, of course, is that this skirmish between the United States and China sets off a global wave of protectionist policies. However, at the moment, Trump seems to be the only global leader reveling in this conflict.
Barring a global wave of protectionism, the real impact of the trade war will be inflation. Quietly, it was announced last week that the 12-month rate of core inflation in the United States rose to 2.4%, the highest rate in just under a decade. This is generally the type of announcement that is greeted by traders flocking to metals and commodities in general. That has not been the case but, if data continues to point towards higher than expected inflation, investors will begin to take notice.
The third possibility is that Trump and Xi come to a compromise on trade by the end of the year. I think there is a distinct possibility of this coming to pass. It's in neither country's economic interest for the face off to continue. Both leaders will likely sit down at some point and, when this occurs, there will be an opportunity for them to cut a deal (even if it's not substantively different than the status quo of the past two decades) and then both declare victory. If we do indeed see a resolution, the market will likely flip to a "risk on" mentality resulting in increased capital inflows to industrial metals and associated mining equities.
Now that we've discussed the potential catalysts for the next stage of this mining bull market, the next question is how long this up leg will last. This is a good time to reference Rick Rule from an early July interview with The Next Bull Market Move:
"My suspicion is that, absent a global recession, and I should qualify that. We've been a long time without a recession, but absent a global recession, I sort of think this business is poised for some very good times.
You and I talked in the prior interviews, I said earlier about supply destruction, and supply destruction has happened in our business.
As demand recovers, the ability to meet changing price signals by adding supply is absent in the two, or three, or four year timeframe in the mining business. Absent a global recession, I suspect that you're going to see stronger commodity prices across the board.
I also think that as a consequence of nearly a decade of underinvestment in resources, that the development and exploration pipelines throughout the sector are empty.
The consequence of that is that you're going to see exploration budgets increase fairly dramatically. So absent a global recession, this is a big ask, I think that we're in for two or three pretty good years in our sector, perhaps more depending on the way that the global economy behaves."
Rick is correct in that the mining industry deserves to boom for another two to three years as a consequence of the supply destruction we've witnessed over the past half-decade. This may very well come to pass. But he's also right to add the caveat that any synchronized global recession or black swan liquidity crisis like we saw in 2008 would not spare mining equities by any stretch of the imagination. These are equities after all, and risky ones at that.
Therefore, we need take into account the general economic picture to get a sense of how long this next mining up leg will last. We are undoubtedly in the later stages of a powerful economic cycle that began just under a decade ago. I feel strongly that this cycle will crest sometime in the next one to three years. It's just the way these things work. The economy is cyclical and this current expansionary wave is already longer than most.
My sense is that this global recession that Rick worries about will indeed materialize in late 2019 or 2020. To account for this possibility, by Q3/19 our portfolio will be more conservative with increased exposure to farmland, forestry and cash.
If I'm wrong and the mining business booms for the next four years without being interrupted by a global recession, then roughly half of our portfolio will still be exposed to mining and we'll do great.
If however we do see a recession in the 2020 timeframe, then losses within the portfolio will be cushioned by this more conservative tilt. Once we are deep in the next mining bear market (whether in 2020 or 2024), I will then again ratchet up our hard asset exposure to 80-90% of the portfolio.
While thinking about the next global economic recession isn't fun, there are a couple positives to keep in mind: (1) we should have a good 12-18 months to make substantial returns from well-managed exploration and development stocks in the meantime and (2) assuming it is caused by a global recession, the next mining bear market should be relatively short in duration. This is because demand-side worries are generally more short-lived than overcapacity issues. Just compare the sharp 2008–2009 resource bear market (sparked by demand worries) with the prolonged 2011–2015 resource bear market (caused by oversupply).
You can sum up my perspective on mining equities as positive over the next 12-18 months, cautious over the medium term (2-3 years), and extremely bullish over the long term (5+ years).
Matt Geiger is the managing partner at MJG Capital, a limited partnership focused on long-term capital appreciation through investments in natural resources.
1) Statements and opinions expressed are the opinions of Matt Geiger and not of Streetwise Reports or its officers. Matt Geiger is wholly responsible for the validity of the statements. Streetwise Reports was not involved in any aspect of the article preparation. The author was not paid by Streetwise Reports LLC for this article. Streetwise Reports was not paid by the author to publish or syndicate this article.
3) From time to time, Streetwise Reports LLC and its directors, officers, employees or members of their families, as well as persons interviewed for articles and interviews on the site, may have a long or short position in securities mentioned. Directors, officers, employees or members of their immediate families are prohibited from making purchases and/or sales of those securities in the open market or otherwise from the time of the interview or the decision to write an article, until one week after the publication of the interview or article.
Charts courtesy of Matt Geiger.
| Digg This Article
-- Published: Tuesday, 28 August 2018 | E-Mail | Print | Source: GoldSeek.com