LIVE Gold Prices $  | E-Mail Subscriptions | Update GoldSeek | GoldSeek Radio 

Commentary : Gold Review : Markets : News Wire : Quotes : Silver : Stocks - Main Page 

 GoldSeek.com >> News >> Story  Disclaimer 
 
Latest Headlines

Gold Gets a Boost of Rocket Fuel From Negative Bond Yields
By: Frank Holmes, US Funds

The Gold (and Silver) Volcano Is Ready to Erupt
By: David H. Smith

Precious Metals Update Video: Where do you park money? Stock markets and hard assets
By: Ira Epstein

Recognition and Adjustment
By: Craig Hemke

After This Confirmation Gold Prices Will Rise Fast
By: Hubert Moolman

Will Silver Soon Follow Gold’s Lead?
By: Stefan Gleason

GoldSeek Radio: Dr. Chris Martenson & Bob Hoye
By: Chris Waltzek Ph.D., GoldSeek Radio

Gold’s Century
By: Michael J. Kosares, USA Gold

What Gets Measures Gets Improved
By: Keith Weiner, Monetary Metals

SWOT Analysis: Central Banks Continue to Show Their Love for Gold
By: Frank Holmes, US Funds

 
Search

GoldSeek Web

 
Are You Being Tossed Around By The China News?


 -- Published: Monday, 20 May 2019 | Print  | Disqus 

By: Avi Gilburt

As I watched and traded the market action over the last several weeks, I witnessed something quite amazing. Yet, this was not the first time I have seen this.

Each time the market was set up for a smaller change of directional move, a news event or a “tweet” seemed to have come out at almost the exact time we need to see the market change direction.

While many saw the news as affecting the market direction, I saw the news as fitting into the market cycle.

I guess it is a matter of perspective, right?

Well, I am quite certain that many of you are thinking to yourself – “boy, that Avi is really foolish. It was clearer than the nose on my face that the negative China news caused the market to drop, whereas seemingly good China news caused the market to then rally.” And, if one takes a very superficial view of the market, one may come to that conclusion. However, I am attempting to open your minds to a much more mature and accurate perspective on how to view markets.

As Jeff Miller, my esteemed colleague at FATrader.com, noted during the week:


CNBC anchors breathlessly discussion the market "round trip" today. This consisted of a 70 bps move. This type of move happens all of the time for no particular reason. Humans want an explanation for everything.

Since the timing was loosely correlated with some reporting on the trade deal, that was grabbed as the reason. There was nothing in the news that you couldn't have seen in this morning's NYT.

And finally, there is the insistence that these are the reactions of "investors" who were "out over their skis" according to one source. Few investors are doing anything about news like this -- except maybe watching.

I think Jeff said this rather well.

For those of you who still believe otherwise, I have one question that I would love for you to answer: If negative China trade news caused the market to “obviously” decline, then why did the market rally 9% last year during the exact same negative China trade war news?

Yes, I know, the silence is deafening. And, as you begin to pick your jaws up off the floor, allow me to show you how often this happens. Here is another example I love to use to prove this point.

On August 17th of 2017, Janet Yellen was quoted as saying that inflation was likely to rise.

This was reported as the “cause” of gold dropping strongly that day immediately after she made this statement. So, obviously this was the fear of inflation which caused gold to drop. Yet, on the exact next day, economic news came out which suggested that inflation was indeed rising.

So, did gold continue to drop? Nope. Gold turned up quite strongly.

Do you not see how foolish it is to attempt to conflate the substance of a news event with a directional move in the market? We often see a market move in opposite directions supposedly based upon the exact same news.

And, if you still do not hear what I am trying to tell you, allow me to present what others have found in their long-term research about the market.

In a 1988 study conducted by Cutler, Poterba, and Summers entitled “What Moves Stock Prices,” they reviewed stock market price action after major economic or other type of news (including major political events) in order to develop a model through which one would be able to predict market moves RETROSPECTIVELY. Yes, you heard me right. They were not even at the stage yet of developing a prospective prediction model.

However, the study concluded that “[m]acroeconomic news bearing on fundamental values explains only about one fifth of the movement in stock market prices.” In fact, they even noted that “many of the largest market movements in recent years have occurred on days when there were no major news events.” They also concluded that “[t]here is surprisingly small effect [from] big news [of] political developments . . . and international events.”

In August 1998, the Atlanta Journal-Constitution published an article by Tom Walker, who conducted his own study of 42 years’ worth of “surprise” news events and the stock market’s corresponding reactions. His conclusion, which will be surprising to most, was that it was exceptionally difficult to identify a connection between market trading and dramatic surprise news. Based upon Walker's study and conclusions, even if you had the news beforehand, you would still not be able to determine the direction of the market only based upon such news.

In 2008, another study was conducted, in which they reviewed more than 90,000 news items relevant to hundreds of stocks over a two-year period. They concluded that large movements in the stocks were NOT linked to any news items:

“Most such jumps weren’t directly associated with any news at all, and most news items didn’t cause any jumps.”

And, just over the last several years alone, how many of you were following the news events such as Brexit, North Korea, terrorist attacks, cessation of QE, record hurricane damage in Houston, Florida, and Puerto Rico, Syrian missile attack, interest rates rising, Crimea, quantitative tightening, Trump, etc., and expected the market to crash on just one of these events? Yet, even taken cumulatively, the market continued to rally over 40% during the last several years. Do you still want to assume that geopolitical events or news will drive our markets?

Just because you see some news events coinciding with directional moves in the market does not support the thesis that this is accurate. Rather, as you just read, much long-term study has been conducted which suggests this is an immature and inaccurate way to view market action.

So, whether there is news to support this or not, allow me to present to you my overall shorter-term perspective. As long as the market remains below 2920/30SPX, we are now setting up a structure to shave off hundreds of points off the S&P500, and rather quickly. Should the market be able to exceed that region, then it can turn the probabilities towards another attempt at the 3000 region.

But, for now, the market is setting up a very dangerous structure, which can provide us a decline similar to what we experienced in the fall of 2018, in January of 2016, in August of 2015, and in August of 2011. While that set-up is not fully in place just yet, should that set up develop over the coming week or two, I would be very cautious about any long positions you hold in your portfolios. We will be tracking the market very carefully for this set up in The Market Pinball Wizard.

But, do not fret. The next decline in the market will simply be a major buying opportunity, setting us up for the next major rally I am expecting over the coming years, which should take us to the 3500-4000SPX region, and complete the bull market rally begun in 2009. It is not likely that this long-term bull market has come to an end just yet, even if we break the lows seen in December of last year.



Avi Gilburt is a widely followed Elliott Wave analyst and founder of ElliottWaveTrader.net, a live trading room featuring his analysis on the S&P 500, precious metals, oil & USD, plus a team of analysts covering a range of other markets.  He recently founded FATRADER.com, a live forum featuring some of the top fundamental analysts online today to showcase research and elevate discussion for traders & investors interested in fundamental rather than technical analysis.


| Digg This Article
 -- Published: Monday, 20 May 2019 | E-Mail  | Print  | Source: GoldSeek.com

comments powered by Disqus



 



Increase Text SizeDecrease Text SizeE-mail Link of Current PagePrinter Friendly PageReturn to GoldSeek.com

 news.goldseek.com >> Story

E-mail Page  | Print  | Disclaimer 


© 1995 - 2019



GoldSeek.com Supports Kiva.org

© GoldSeek.com, Gold Seek LLC

The content on this site is protected by U.S. and international copyright laws and is the property of GoldSeek.com and/or the providers of the content under license. By "content" we mean any information, mode of expression, or other materials and services found on GoldSeek.com. This includes editorials, news, our writings, graphics, and any and all other features found on the site. Please contact us for any further information.

Live GoldSeek Visitor Map | Disclaimer


Map

The views contained here may not represent the views of GoldSeek.com, Gold Seek LLC, its affiliates or advertisers. GoldSeek.com, Gold Seek LLC makes no representation, warranty or guarantee as to the accuracy or completeness of the information (including news, editorials, prices, statistics, analyses and the like) provided through its service. Any copying, reproduction and/or redistribution of any of the documents, data, content or materials contained on or within this website, without the express written consent of GoldSeek.com, Gold Seek LLC, is strictly prohibited. In no event shall GoldSeek.com, Gold Seek LLC or its affiliates be liable to any person for any decision made or action taken in reliance upon the information provided herein.