Advertise | Bookmark | Contact Us | E-Mail List |  | Update Page | UraniumSeek.com 

Commentary : Gold Review : Markets : News Wire : Quotes : Silver : Stocks - Main Page 

 GoldSeek.com >> News >> Story  Disclaimer 
 
Latest Headlines

Gold Seeker Weekly Wrap-Up: Gold and Silver Gain Over 1% and 2% on the Week
By: Chris Mullen, Gold Seeker Report

Ira Epstein's Metals Video 11 17 2017
By: Ira Epstein

Next-Generation Crazy: The Fed Plans For The Coming Recession
By: John Rubino

COT Gold, Silver and US Dollar Index Report - November 17, 2017
By: GoldSeek.com

Gold Miners’ Q3’17 Fundamentals
By: Adam Hamilton, CPA

Bonfire of the Absurdities
By: John Mauldin

The Social Security Inflation Lag Calendar - Partial Indexing Part 1
By: Daniel R. Amerman, CFA

Rob From The Middle Class Economics
By: Gary Christenson

GoldSeek Radio Nugget: John Williams and Chris Waltzek
By: radio.GoldSeek.com

The Metals Market Is A Mess And Will Likely Continue To Frustrate You
By: Avi Gilburt

 
Search

GoldSeek Web

 
Statist Monetary Cranks

By: Gary North

 -- Published: Sunday, 13 August 2017 | Print  | Disqus 

By: Gary North

I have been writing refutations of monetary cranks for over half a century.

I wrote my first essay on a monetary crank, Gertrude Coogan, in 1965. Her book was Money Creators. It came out in the 1930’s in the Great Depression. That was the golden era of anti-gold standard fiat monetary cranks.

I wrote the essay because R. J. Rushdoony had been taken in by the cranks in the late 1950’s. Specifically, he read the greenbackers. He also read Mises, but he did not understand Mises’ monetary theory.

The greenback monetary cranks have always been opposed to the Federal Reserve. Why? Because the regional Federal Reserve banks are privately owned. They hate all private banking. They are committed statists. They originally were people of the Left in the late 1880’s. Today, they are found on the Right, but they are in no way defenders of the free market. They want Congress in control of money. They also teach that there can and should be zero interest rates in society. This is sheer quackery. It is the equivalent of faith in perpetual motion. Mises was the great opponent of such an idea.

As I say, Rushdoony did not understand Mises on this point. At the William Volker Fund in 1963, where Rushdoony worked, and I was a summer intern, I spent the summer reading Mises. I was paid to do this. It was the best job I ever had. At the Volker Fund, Rushdoony had stocked the give-away book shelf with monetary crank books. I knew there was a problem.

Time to buy old US gold coins

Finally, in 1965, I wrote a long paper for Rushdoony on Coogan when I was in grad school. I did it for free. He immediately dropped references to her. He never quoted a monetary crank’s arguments on money again. He learned.

I published that essay in my book, An Introduction to Christian Economics, in 1973. You can read it here.

In 2011, the Mises Institute published an updated version of my paper. I titled it Gertrude Coogan’s Bluff. You can read it here.

Today, Ellen Brown is the intellectual heir of Gertrude Coogan. Her book is Web of Debt. She is a statist. I have dealt with her errors, both theoretical and historical, here. She started out as a critic of the Federal Reserve, but when Bernanke oversaw the reduction of interest rates to almost zero, she switched sides and became a cheerleader. Her intellectually crippled followers switched with her. The Bible has a phrase for this: “the blind leading the blind into the ditch.”

Then there are the followers of Major Douglas. He was an engineer with no understanding of economics. He began writing in 1918. He also was a believer in government fiat money. He gathered a considerable following. He called his idea social credit. There were political parties formed in the 1930’s in England, Canada, and Australia devoted to social credit.

I wrote a book on Social Credit in 1993: Salvation Through Inflation. You can read it here.

Major Douglas was praised by John Maynard Keynes in The General Theory of Employment, Interest, and Money (pp. 370-71). That was because Keynes was a monetary crank. His followers pretend that he wasn’t. His praise of Douglas is a major embarrassment to academic economists who call themselves Keynesians. They would like to drop this down the memory hole. I like to dredge it up. Here is my Mises Institute speech on this.

Read the Whole Article

 

Gary North [send him mail] is the author of Mises on Money. Visit http://www.garynorth.com. He is also the author of a free 31-volume series, An Economic Commentary on the Bible.

Copyright © 2017 Gary North


| Digg This Article
 -- Published: Sunday, 13 August 2017 | E-Mail  | Print  | Source: GoldSeek.com

comments powered by Disqus
-- Visit LewRockwell.com



 



Increase Text SizeDecrease Text SizeE-mail Link of Current PagePrinter Friendly PageReturn to GoldSeek.com

 news.goldseek.com >> Story

E-mail Page  | Print  | Disclaimer 


© 1995 - 2017



GoldSeek.com Supports Kiva.org

© GoldSeek.com, Gold Seek LLC

The content on this site is protected by U.S. and international copyright laws and is the property of GoldSeek.com and/or the providers of the content under license. By "content" we mean any information, mode of expression, or other materials and services found on GoldSeek.com. This includes editorials, news, our writings, graphics, and any and all other features found on the site. Please contact us for any further information.

Live GoldSeek Visitor Map | Disclaimer

The views contained here may not represent the views of GoldSeek.com, its affiliates or advertisers. GoldSeek.com makes no representation, warranty or guarantee as to the accuracy or completeness of the information (including news, editorials, prices, statistics, analyses and the like) provided through its service. Any copying, reproduction and/or redistribution of any of the documents, data, content or materials contained on or within this website, without the express written consent of GoldSeek.com, is strictly prohibited. In no event shall GoldSeek.com or its affiliates be liable to any person for any decision made or action taken in reliance upon the information provided herein.