LIVE Gold Prices $  | E-Mail Subscriptions | Update GoldSeek | GoldSeek Radio 

Commentary : Gold Review : Markets : News Wire : Quotes : Silver : Stocks - Main Page 

 GoldSeek.com >> News >> Story  Disclaimer 
 
Latest Headlines

GoldSeek.com to Launch New Website
By: GoldSeek.com

Is Gold Price Action Warning Of Imminent Monetary Collapse Part 2?
By: Hubert Moolman

Gold and Silver Are Just Getting Started
By: Frank Holmes, US Funds

Silver Makes High Wave Candle at Target – Here’s What to Expect…
By: Clive Maund

Gold Blows Through Upside Resistance - The Chase Is On
By: Avi Gilburt

U.S. Mint To Reduce Gold & Silver Eagle Production Over The Next 12-18 Months
By: Steve St. Angelo, SRSrocco Report

Gold's sharp rise throws Financial Times into an erroneous sulk
By: Chris Powell, GATA

Precious Metals Update Video: Gold's unusual strength
By: Ira Epstein

Asian Metals Market Update: July-29-2020
By: Chintan Karnani, Insignia Consultants

Gold's rise is a 'mystery' because journalism always fails to pursue it
By: Chris Powell, GATA

 
Search

GoldSeek Web

 
Why the Plunge Protection Team Loves Fridays

By: Rick Ackerman, Rick's Picks

 -- Published: Monday, 24 November 2014 | Print  | Disqus 

The Plunge Protection Team has been hard at work lately, although not in the way some traders might imagine. The very name evokes the shadowy activities of a group of Svengalis believed to control the stock market through timely interventions in such key trading vehicles as the S&P 500 futures. In fact, the PPT, more blandly known as the President’s Working Group on Financial Markets, was commissioned under President Reagan after the 1987 Crash to prevent meltdowns. These day, however, nearly six years into a ferocious bull market that seldom pauses for breath, one might question why a Plunge Protection Team is needed at all. The answer is that the PPT, far from defending against selling panics, has been furtively on the offensive, triggering short-squeeze panics that spike shares to new record highs at every opportunity. Usually, the news catalyzing these rallies hits the tickertape on a Friday, when the effects of a short-covering binge are apt to be most effective. It is hardly a stretch to imagine that these engineered events have been scheduled and coordinated by the PPT, working in concert with the central banks.

Last Friday, for instance, U.S. stocks opened with a ballistic lurch higher on news that China, increasingly fearful of deflation, is about to ease. This had already sent stocks in Europe and Asia screaming higher overnight, setting up Wall Street’s by-now reflexive reaction. Recall that just five weeks earlier – on a Friday, as it happened – Japan announced its own, epic stimulus package – Max Keiser wryly called it QE9 – to the same effect: stock markets around the world soared. A presumably intended side-effect was that U.S. T-Bond prices spiked higher, briefly pushing yields down to lows that will linger in investors’ collective subconscious with a sedative effect against whatever fears they may have harbored about any future tightening.

Losing Steam?

Permabulls who believe this game can continue indefinitely are in for a rude awakening, especially if they have ceased paying attention to certain technical signs that might warn of a downturn. One of them, declining volume since 2011, has been too obvious and important even for fools to miss.  However, it is all too easily dismissed with stocks in a parabola since mid-October. Less obvious, and possibly significant, is that Friday’s rally failed to get second wind. The new from China juiced the Dow 175 points on the opening, but the surge petered out in just ten minutes before giving way to a ratcheting, four-hour downtrend. And did anyone notice that crude oil prices barely budged?  What this suggests is that the central banks have held interest rates near zero for so long that easing itself is no longer seen as capable of stimulating economic growth, only of goading share prices higher.

For our part, we’ll continue to get short at every promising ‘Hidden Pivot’ rally target, since the stock market could go into a 5000-point dive at any time. Granted, there’s no way technical analysis can ‘prove’ the Dow isn’t bound for 20,000 or higher. But with earnings flattening at some very large U.S. companies, Europe’s economy on the brink of deep relapse, U.S. home prices stagnating, commodity prices falling and China looking winded, it’s hardly crazy to say that permabulls are playing with fire. We’d rather trade both sides of the market anyway, getting long near the lows of targeted swings, then reversing the positions at projected highs.  On Friday we used this tactic to buy DIA puts in conjunction with a 178.47 rally target. The actual high, recorded on an opening-bar leap, was 178.60, allowing subscribers to buy put options that went solidly in-the-black by day’s end. Typically, we try to sell half of any option position that has doubled in price so that the remaining puts can be held without risk. If you are skeptical that this strategy works, come into the chat room and ask subscribers yourself. Click here for a two-week trial subscription that includes all features and services of Rick’s Picks, including impromptu technical analysis/trading sessions conducted on ‘live’ charts during market hours.


***
$ JYM13 – June Yen (Last:0.8481)

November 24 2014  1:08 a.m. EST

The chart shown has implications that may or may not prevent Japan from getting sucked into a deflationary black hole. However, the chart is quite clear on the question of whether BOJ will be successful in its longstanding goal of trashing the yen. (Answer: Yes, very.) The small rally in early October from around 0.9001 validates the pattern itself, and the decisive progress beneath that level since implies that the D target at 0.7332 is likely to be reached. This will obviously benefit Japanese exporters, but it will also put more pressure on manufacturers in the U.S. and elsewhere that compete with them. Traders should position from the short side until the target is reached, but be alert for a rally back up to the red line, since that would set up a ‘mechanical’ short to the target using a 0.9418 stop-loss. That’s far more than we would ordinarily risk, but you could cut it down to size by using the ‘camouflage’ technique. When appropriate, ask in the chat room if you’re uncertain about how to do this.  Take a free trial subscription that will allow you to access not only the touts, bulletins, updates and impromptu trading webinars during market hours, but a 24/7 chat room that draws veteran traders from around the world.


| Digg This Article
 -- Published: Monday, 24 November 2014 | E-Mail  | Print  | Source: GoldSeek.com

comments powered by Disqus



 



Increase Text SizeDecrease Text SizeE-mail Link of Current PagePrinter Friendly PageReturn to GoldSeek.com

 news.goldseek.com >> Story

E-mail Page  | Print  | Disclaimer 


© 1995 - 2019



GoldSeek.com Supports Kiva.org

© GoldSeek.com, Gold Seek LLC

The content on this site is protected by U.S. and international copyright laws and is the property of GoldSeek.com and/or the providers of the content under license. By "content" we mean any information, mode of expression, or other materials and services found on GoldSeek.com. This includes editorials, news, our writings, graphics, and any and all other features found on the site. Please contact us for any further information.

Live GoldSeek Visitor Map | Disclaimer


Map

The views contained here may not represent the views of GoldSeek.com, Gold Seek LLC, its affiliates or advertisers. GoldSeek.com, Gold Seek LLC makes no representation, warranty or guarantee as to the accuracy or completeness of the information (including news, editorials, prices, statistics, analyses and the like) provided through its service. Any copying, reproduction and/or redistribution of any of the documents, data, content or materials contained on or within this website, without the express written consent of GoldSeek.com, Gold Seek LLC, is strictly prohibited. In no event shall GoldSeek.com, Gold Seek LLC or its affiliates be liable to any person for any decision made or action taken in reliance upon the information provided herein.